“blah blah blah zionist lesbians heres an out of context picture that proves that there are NO right wing parties anywhere in the world’ – Average internet right winger

murica

Dec 25, 2024

Recently Elon Musk Tweeted “only the AFD can save Germany”

The terminally online, purity spiraling “right”, allergic to any kind of activism, like clock work jumped into action :

This one is funny, a guy with a hebrew letters name popping up complaining about Socialism, while neo-nazis complain about Tiny hat people.

And this, this is the OFFICIAL, Leader of the AFD, Chairwoman of the Party, Alice Wiedel. she is a Lesbian. She is a neo-liberal libertarian economist. She is a zionist.

Her “wife” is in the red next to her.

She is not far from a Trump, or Javier Milei.

So why the outrage ? why would they even bother calling them Nazis, or far right, or anything like that. is it possible there is something deeper here ?

lets look up, on google, “leader of the afd”.

We get some interesting search returns :

This one here is the most interesting as far as clues as to what is going on here :

an extremist wing ? Alice Wiedel not the leader of the AFD ? something isn’t adding up here.

To Understand whats going on here we have to take a look at germany, and the history of the AFD.

The AFD originated as a libertarian, sort of neo-pirate party offshoot, opposed to the Euro-zone, free speech absolutists, In North West Germany, and Bavaria.

But if we look at the electoral map, we see that AFD power is concentrated in the East, where is it overwhelmingly the most popular party

To understand this we have to understand that there are actually two different Germany.

In Western Germany, a campaign of “denazification” took place under US occupation. former members of the NSDAP were forbidden from running for Office. General Otto Remer, of the Wehrmacht, created a successor party to the NSDAP, the SRP (Socialist Reich Party) and attempted to run for office, and was showing signs of being able to win elections. performing shockingly well in the newly democratic West Germany. largely due to a great deal of mystery funding they were receiving that was allowing this German manifestation of the “European New Right”. The New Right Also known as “Third Positionism”, was created by post war fascists caught between the Soviets and the USA, Alain Du Benoist, Leon Degrelle, Jean Thiriart, Yockey, Moseley. it was very different from ww2 era fascist movements in a few ways, namely a rejection of overseas Imperialism, and largely a rejection of nationalism, creating instead an idea of “Imperium” or “Pan-nationalism” as the Party created by Oswald Moseley and the National Bolshevik/White nationalist Thiriart advocated on the heels of the foundation laid for the EU, The Idea Would be a United Europe, sometimes including the Soviet Union (Namely in the Vision of Moseley and Thiriart : “Europe, an Empire from Vladivostok to Lisbon” was the title of Thiriart’s unfinished Political Manifesto) and Sometimes being neutral between the US and Soviets, but always considering the USA the greater threat. Their close ally in the New Right was the french Nazi-Trotskyist “New European Order” (In the words of scholar Nicolas Lebourg, “the NEO virulently defended the idea of a new world order based on racial hierarchy, in which ‘white humanity’, by federating its nations, will see the birth of ‘the new man within the new race’ through a totalitarian party-state.”^[1]) founded by a French White Supremacist, and Trotskyist turned National Socialist (following the rise of European Fascism), Rene Binet famous one for his leadership of the NEO, and also for his book “the theory of racialism”. Remer’s statements, and declassified CIA documents tell us that the Socialist Reich Party’s source of funding, was none other the the Soviet Union Under Stalin, and East Germany :

….

After his release from allied captivity, he became involved in West German post-war politics. He set up a political organisation, the Socialist Reich Party, in 1950, which was promptly banned in 1952 for making inflammatory political statements, but not before it had gathered 360,000 supporters in Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein, and won 16 seats in the state parliament. The Socialist Reich Party also won eight seats in the Parliament of the Free Hanseatic City of Bremen. The party had received some financing from the Soviet Union,^[1] and worked with the Communist Party of Germany, whose aim was the destabilisation of the West German state. Among the campaigning themes of the Socialist Reich Party was that the Holocaust had been an allied propaganda invention (it accused the United States of building fake gas chambers and producing bogus newsreel footage about concentration camps),^[3] that the politics of the newly-formed West German state which had been created by the Allied powers were merely a front for American domination,^[4] and that West Germany‘s purported status as a puppet of the United States should be opposed.^[1]

he party claimed Chancellor Konrad Adenauer was an American puppet and that Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz was the last legitimate President of the German Reich, as he had been appointed by Adolf Hitler.^[4] It denied the existence of the Holocaust, claimed that the United States built the gas ovens of the Dachau concentration camp after the Second World War and that films of concentration camps were faked.^[4] The SRP also advocated Europe, led by a reunited German Reich, as a “third force” against both capitalism and communism.^[4] It demanded the re-annexation of the former eastern territories of Germany and a “solution of the Jewish question“. According to Karl Dietrich Bracher, “SRP propaganda concentrated on a vague ‘popular socialism’ in which the old Nazis rediscovered well-worn slogans, and also on a nationalism whose championship of Reich and war was but a thinly disguised continuation of the Lebensraum ideology”.^[6] The SRP also promoted the stab-in-the-back myth, structured itself in a very hierarchical manner reminiscent of the Führerprinzip, organized meetings that featured uniformed guards, and “succeeded temporarily in presenting Remer as the protector of the Third Reich against the ‘traitors’ of the resistance”.^[6]

According to Martin A. Lee, although the SRP was anti-communist, it focused on criticizing Britain and the United States for “splitting their beloved Fatherland in two” and avoided criticism of the Soviet Union in the hope that a future deal could be made with the Soviets to reunite Germany.^[7] The SRP took the stance that Germany should remain neutral in the emerging Cold War and opposed the West German government’s Atlanticist foreign policy. In case of war between the Soviet Union and the West, Remer “insisted that Germans should not fight to cover an American retreat if the Russians got the upper hand in a war”, and said that he would “show the Russians the way to the Rhine” and that SRP members would “post themselves as traffic policemen, spreading their arms so that the Russians can find their way through Germany as quickly as possible”.^[8][9] Martin A. Lee alleges that these statements attracted the attention of Soviet officials, who became willing to fund the SRP for tactical reasons. According to Lee, for a few years in the early 1950s the SRP received Soviet funds while the Communist Party of Germany did not, due to being purportedly viewed as “ineffectual”.^[10][11] The SRP viewed Israel as an “enemy power” in its foreign policy.^[12]

One of the most significant pieces of evidence is the testimony of Otto Ernst Remer. In a 1997 interview, Remer admitted that he had received Soviet backing during his time in the party. Remer stated that he had met with KGB officials in East Berlin and had received financial and logistical support from the Soviet Union.^[13] In addition to Remer’s testimony, there are other sources of evidence that support the claim that the Soviet Union supported the SRP. For example, a 1953 KGB memo outlines the agency’s efforts to cultivate and support right-wing extremist groups in Germany, including the SRP. The memo states that the KGB’s aim was “to create a rightist movement that will weaken the position of the United States, weaken the position of the Atlantic bloc, and encourage the German population to seek a neutralist policy”.^[14][15] Similarly, the CIA’s declassified “Family Jewels” documents reveal that the agency had evidence of Soviet funding for far-right groups in Europe, including the SRP.^[16] Other examples of this include a comment supposedly made by Wolf von Westarp that the West Comminission of East Germany´s ruling Socialist Unity Party, was a substantial patron of the party.^[17] Historian Michael Burleigh, in his book The Third Reich: A New History, discusses the Soviet Union’s support for the SRP during the Cold War in extreme detail.^[18] Additionally, the Gauck archives in Germany contain evidence of Soviet support for the SRP. The archives contain documents that show that the Stasi, the East German secret police, had frequent meetings with SRP officials and provided them with financial and logistical support.^[13]

….

The Soviet union’s support for western fascism, rather then “western Marxism” which was fully under the domination of the US intel services operating through their intermediaries the frankfurt school, is more fully explored in our last article : ^{“On Liberalism” For a Basic run Down quickly however, the US government had invited the Frankfurt school to US university campuses when they were exiled from Germany during the NSDAP. They were viciously anti-soviet, and in fact, anti-communist : https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/the-cia-the-frankfurt-schools-anti-communism/}

This new cultural divide and anti-nazism in the west began to effect everything, even immigration. here we can see the demographic breakdown of modern Germany :

As you can see, the west is multi-cultural, the East is Ethnically Pure German. Above we mentioned “denazification” in the US controlled West Germany. But something very different happened in the East. Stalin at the same time he was supporting the SRP, and the European New Right, had begun advocating for German reunification, and the removal of both US and Soviet troops from German territory. this plan, presented to the allies is known as the “Stalin Notes”. With Stalin’s only precondition, being that elections be free, and ALL parties can participate. including former Nazis.

Stalin’s relationship with post-war German nazis goes even deeper. West Germany rebuilt itself on Liberalism. its military was formed from the ground up with an officer corp educated in the United States. Army unit traditions, uniforms, cadences were all invented from scratch, based on the US army. Contrary to this, in East Germany, as the East German military and secret police were rebuilt, the ENTIRE high command, general staff, chief’s of staff, and more then half of the regular line officer corp etc. were ALL (as in 100% of them when talking about the high command, lower ranking officers like Platoon Commanders and Company Commanders were only around 50% former NSDAP members with the rest having been Volga Germans((Russo-Deutsch, ethnic Germans of Russia who had lived in the the Volga German republic before it was disbanded and the population largely exiled to smaller Ethnic German national regions, of Kazakhstan and central Asia)) serving in ethnic German units of the Soviet Red Army) former members of the Leftwing faction (Strasserist) of the NSDAP. The east German army based its Uniforms, marches, unit traditions, ranks, doctrine, Cadences(Soldiers songs) on the Kingdom of Prussia, and German Empire.

And as far as the East German government, rather then having a one party state like other Soviet Satellites, had a 5 party coalition, with each party representing a different segment of the population and portfolio of Government: the Democratic Farmer’s party represented peasants and small scale land owners/ rural populations. The CDU – Christian Democratic party, representing urban and Suburban educated middle class Burghers. The Liberal Democratic party representing ideas for a libertarian socialism. The Socialist Unity party representing Marxist-leninist ideals, and East German variety of Socialism that came to be called “ Left conservatism”, as in Culturally conservative, opposition to homosexuality and abortion, Patriotism( Patriotic socialism), and finally, the one that is most important to this discussion: The National Democratic Party of (East) Germany which was a party made for, Veterans of the East German army, Police forces, and FORMER MEMBERS OF THE NSDAP.

The NPD was founded on Stalin’s orders, as a vehicle to bring German Ethno-nationalism into the Soviet sphere. This is an article that was hosted on CODOH (holocaust revisionist history site) describing the process. https://www.scribd.com/document/781420966/Stalin-s-German-Nationalist-Party-CODOH-2

Moving forward in history, because East Germans never experienced “German collective guilt”, and Denazification ended in East Germany in 1948 Easterners never had a hatred for being German beaten into them. So the “far right” has found Eastern Germany to be a perfect breeding ground. I understand we’ve jumped around, but these different aspects are absolutely vital to understanding what is happening in Germany.

In the lead up to reunification, the Socialist Unity Party threw out of office its entire “left conservative” and Stalinist old guard. Replaced by a jewish, pro-western, liberal named Gregor Gyzi, rather then a Communist, who brought the remnants into a coalition with the western far left and created “Die Linke”. Die Linke remained very popular in East Germany we can look at 2019 vs 2024 electoral breakdown in Thuringia

We see a huge change took place, and a new party on the map, BSW. we’ll return to this in a moment. Aside from Die Linke in a few isolated places in East Germany, the entire East German political elite was exiled from politics. All historical narratives were from a West German perspective. you hear only about how evil East Germany was, the Stazi. But East Germany has suffered very badly economically, and remained ethnically pure, and extremely hostile to immigrants. East Germany experienced more then 200 attacks on migrant centers, JUST in 2016. This one here, after “far right extremists” molotov’ed the Migrant center, the entire town came out to laugh and cheer for the building being burned down:

Interesting for a place where the left wing is winning elections.

This opposition to immigrants, and the feeling of being systematically denied any representation in politics. Documentaries and Media portraying your country as evil Stalinist repression lead to a political and cultural phenomenon in Eastern Germany known as ‘Ostalgie”, a Portmanteau of East, and Nostalgia. so Eastern Nostalgia, or “Longing for the east”. Basically a desire in East Germans for them to reassert political sovereignty and identity. And because East Germans never experienced “German collective guilt” and the East German state in its propoganda had tried to convince the population that West Germany was a French Appanage, ruled from Frankfurt(As in the Franks) and that East Germany was the “real” Germany. So part of this Ostalgie and movement to reassert their own East German identity, German ETHNICITY, in opposition to multi-cultural Federal Germany takes center stage. That leads us to a brief detour before we bring this back around to the AFD for the rest of the article, maybe you will have noticed, between 2019 and 2024 there is a new party, that is doing better then Die Linke, which was the ruling party in perpetuity in Thuringia since the 90s. The BSW :

This is really important. The BSW, is a break away offshoot of Die Linke, known as Bundnis Sahra Wagenknecht, or “movement for Sahra Wagenknecht”. Shes known as the Horse Shoe theory candidate (So far left she seems far right)

You see, Germany does not just have Parties. in Their political culture, the way the democrats have “progressives” and “congressional Black Caucus” etc. etc. German Parties have factions within them,that are often DRASTICALLY different from the image of the party, or the ideology of the party leadership.

When Die Linke absorbed the East German communist leaders, even though it ventured towards western progressivism and liberalism, it brought many voters who agreed with the policies of the Old Guard with it.

Enter Sahra Wagenknecht, she was leader of the “communist faction” of Die Linke, and she has been butting heads with the leadership of Die Linke for awhile, over her opposition to “American influence”, namely, Wokeness. She brought with her, the ideology of the old east German elite, “left conservatism”. Where The jewish Atlanticist Gregor Gyzi hates Germans (openly wishes for their eradication) Wagenknecht opposes immigration and multiculturalism, proclaiming that “ a Welfare state cannot exist without ethnic homogeneity”. Die Linke supports ‘trans-rights”, Wagenknecht opposes “LGBTQ ideology”. Die Linke wants liberal social policies and doesn’t care about workers, Wagenknecht says Western liberalism is poisoning German culture, and pushes for economic populism. In late 2023 she left Die Linke, and took more then half of Die Linke’s voter base with her. Die Linke had been supported by people who voted for them just because they represented a continuation of their parents party, the Socialist Unity. And all of those voters just switched to the BSW as soon as they announced, Die Linke has been made irrelevant, and is now running transgenders for tiny seats in suburban Hamburg, completely surrendering their rule of the east. Key takeaways here are often DRASTIC difference in ideology, within parties, based on the faction they subscribe too. and Left wing easterners, are more “right wing” and ethnocentric, and in touch with German ethnic identity, then “conservative” Westerners.

these factions are throughout all the parties, and the trends of the east; Opposition to immigration, cultural conservatism, German ethnic identity, are universal. The CDU has its own East German faction, “the values Union”, led by Hans Georg Massen (currently being investigated for ties to right wing radicals and Monarchists that were, supposedly, planning a coup, from WITHIN the German Military, Police, and Intel Agencies).

Now, Back to the AFD. Remember everything we have covered so far. We mentioned above its zionist lesbian leader, and we’ve, Paradoxically seen a bunch of articles on a “real leader” of the AFD, Bjorn Hocke. So just who is Hocke ?

He is the Leader of the AFD in Thuringia, is potentially the most popular member of the AFD. He opposes Holocaust reparations payments to Israel. Has called for Germany to leave NATO and expel US troops. He has sworn to rip down all monuments to the defeat of Nazi Germany in the country. Has called for German territory to be returned to Germany, including buying for the former East Prussia (Kaliningrad) from Russia. He’s not just the leader of Thuringia though, he is also the leader of the AFD in all of East Germany. and leads something called “Der Flugel” .

Just like all the rest of the parties in Germany, the AFD has factions.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37274201

It began as a semi-Libertarian party, free speech party, but two main factions have emerged. Mitte ( “the center”) is a zionist, neo-liberal, capitalist faction, it IS led by Lesbian Zionist and economist, Alice Wiedel and has long been the main stream leadership of the AFD. If this was where the AFD ended, NOBODY would be calling them far right. If Allegiance to the tiny hats was the reality, the media and liberals would have no reason to oppose them at all.

the other side of this story though, is Der Flugel aka “the Social-National faction”. And it represents two different visions for the AFD, and Germany. Alternative Mitte, supposedly sees the AFD as a vehicle to bring prosperity and sanity to German governance. But When Der Flugel was founded, it was proceeded by “the Erfurt declaration”, which outlined a German, ETHNO-NATIONALISTIC, vision for the AFD. and this vision has been viciously opposed by the AFD’s mainstream leadership, including Wiedel :

…
In March 2015, Björn Höcke and André Poggenburg, then chairman of the AfD Saxony-Anhalt, initiated the “Erfurt Declaration” (Erfurter Resolution). The ethnic-nationalist movement “The Wing” then formed.^[6] Der Flügel‘s founding document, the Erfurt Declaration of 2015, describes AfD as a “resistance movement against the further erosion of the identity of Germany.”^[7] Henry Bernhard of DLF wrote in 2019 that the group’s radicalization was apparent at the group’s annual meetings (Kyffhäusertreffen), with the group increasingly accepting “racism, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, xenophobia, historical revisionism,” and the downplaying of Nazi crimes.^[7] Höcke and Kalbitz are controversial for their links to neo-Nazi groups.^[1][8]

Der Flügel turned against the course of the AfD party founder Bernd Lucke and forced the power struggle within the party. At the Essen party convent in July 2015 there was a test of strength at which Bernd Lucke appeared. The national conservative Frauke Petry was elected as party chairwoman and Bernd Lucke withdrew from the AfD.^[6]

The group attained a dominant position in the AfD associations of several states in eastern Germany, particularly Brandenburg, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia.^[7] In 2020, the group was estimated to have some 7,000 members, constituting one-fifth of the AfD’s total membership.^[1] The group has been the subject of internal party battles within the AfD, where relative moderates within the party have opposed the influence of extremist elements.^[1] Leading AfD politicians, like AfD chairman Jörg Meuthen, criticized Höcke’s “personality cult” but not necessarily his far-right political positions.^[9]

The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) classified Der Flügel in January 2019 as a suspected case of right-wing extremism, since its “propagated policy concept was aimed at exclusion, contempt and deprivation of rights of foreigners, migrants, especially Muslims, and politically dissenting people.”^[7] In March 2020, the BfV classified Der Flügel as “a right-wing extremist endeavor against the free democratic basic order” that was incompatible with Germany’s Basic Law, and placed the group under intelligence surveillance, with the BfV chief describing right-wing extremism as the biggest threat to German democracy.^{[10][11][8][12]} Following the BfV’s announcement, the AfD’s national leaders demanded the dissolution of Der Flügel, and Höcke and Kalbitz asked members to “cease their activities.”^[1] However, Der Flügel members were not asked to leave the AfD, and in their announcement of the group’s disbandment, Höcke and Kalbitz wrote that, “In principle, it is not possible to dissolve what does not formally exist.”^[1] The pair also retained their leadership positions in two of the AfD’s state associations.^[1]

In January 2022, Meuthen declared that he would resign from the party chairmanship with immediate effect and resign from the AfD.^[13] He justified this with the fact that he had lost the power struggle with the formally dissolved right-wing extremist Der Flügel over the political direction of AfD. Meuthen criticized that the party had developed far to the right and was in large parts no longer concurrent with the Liberal democratic basic order in Germany.^{[4][14] “}

…

The AFD, as a WHOLE, is NOT considered an extremist group by the office for protection of the constitution. the AFD is not considered “FAR RIGHT”, by The German government….

DER FLUGEL is.

And its not because they secretly love the tiny hats like “everyone else” in politics. This is a genuine expression of European Far right nationalism, and is the most successful, and extreme, version of it, since 1945.

The AFD has been kicked out of its European Parliament group, Identity, for being “too extreme”, because of Der Flugel. Orban’s new Parliament group, Patriots of Europe, also refused to consider the AFD for membership.

Because of Der Flugel, AFD is being attacked up and down the spectrum, blackballed from EU politics, blackballed from German politics. Der Flugel is the reason AFD is called “far right”, not the libertarian zionists who hold “leadership”.

Now you’re asking yourself, “if he’s opposed to the zionists why didn’t they expel him ?“

The short answer is, they attempted to. in Both cases the party rank and file rebelled and over-ruled the party bosses, because of its early libertarian bent, the party congresses are public, everyone can see how delegates vote, its all transparent, and the leadership of the AFD needs a majority of delegates to make any executive decisions such as expelling the most popular leader. This so aggravated the tiny hats, that many resigned from the party.

Now we get to early 2024, the party has its annual congress and its time to set the agenda for the campaign season, as well as elect party leadership….

There is a blow out. Der flugel candidates sweep the list, Hocke himself has more then 60% of Delegates lining up behind him. No one on the record as opposed to Hocke survives the vote. mind you this is super recent, its the start of 2024, so of course you can go back 12 years and find pictures of AFD leaders in small hats. things have CHANGED, however. In some of these party elections, just to flaunt his power, at the last minute he weighs in on the election for some leadership posts. each of the candidates has been running for months to fill these positions. At the last minute, Hocke decides he doesn’t like the candidates, and he almost randomly picks some loyalists, stands up to tell the party who he wants them to vote for. and His guys win. they handily beat the people who announced an intention to run and have been campaigning for months. With a word he changes who is going to run what position. By the end of the party congress, 2/3rds of leadership positions are held by Hocke loyalists, not a single person who is opposed to Hocke wins a seat. Wiedel and Chrupalla come kiss the ring and are ALLOWED to keep their positions, as the only Mitte members on the leadership committee. simply because the AFD currently has no chance of becoming chancellor, so its purely symbolic. You can be certain, that in the coming days in the AFD looks ready to win out right, Bjorn Hocke, not Alice Wiedel will be the candidate for Chancellor.

Right after these party elections resulted in the takeover in 2024 by Der Flugel, of the AFD. The party adopted a far more right wing messaging strategy. AFD dances on tik tok, including the famous incident on Sylt(German Party Island) of upper middle class 20 somethings (including a number of very attractive young women) singing “Deustchland fur Deustche, Auslander Raus !” (Germany for Germans, foreigners out !”) AI videos like this banger showing a bunch of beautiful blondes and Aryan bodybuilders deporting millions of brown people and everyone celebrating with Aperol Spritz.

This change in strategy, and leaning into “right wing extremism” was met with disbelief by the West German AFD-Mitte lolberts, they claimed Hocke was finally finished, the party was sure to collapse and they could rebuild without Der Flugel.

Yet the AFD shot through the polls, and has now, near the end of 2024, become the second most popular party in Germany, and THE MOST popular party among voters 16-35. including FEMALE voters. the “AFD girls” doing dances on Tiktoks set to upbeat Europop with lyrics about mass deportations are now ubiquitous on German Tiktok.

The new Hocke AFD is concentrating on solidifying their power in East Germany. Because their opposition to migration, their insistence on German ethnic identity, their cultural depiction as outsiders, is all appealing to East German voters and the Der Flugel AFD, much like the BSW who share very similar opinions on German culture, the Geopolitical relationship with Russia ethnic identity and Migration, has become a vehicle for the Grievances of, and representation for, East German regional separatism. Dividing Germany into two Germany’s, may not be ideal, but at the moment it seems like the most achievable solution. The are allowing Mitte, and the lolberts to appeal to the more liberal Western Germans, While Der Flugel turns eastern Germany into a fortress of German ethnic nationalism. This is why, the Lesbian zionist Wiedel still has a position. She may be the “Chairman”, but she is NOT the Leader of the AFD. Bjorn Hocke is, and he may very well be the leader of the entire Euro-Germanic Diaspora, and future leader of independent, Ethnically Pure, Pan-Germanic ethno-state aligned with Russia, ready to leave the EU and NATO, and join the Eurasian world.

The AFD is the MOST, right wing, Nationalistic major party in any European Country, and the most successful Party on the far right since 1945, Spamming pictures of AFD members in tiny hats from a decade ago (who have since resigned from the party) cannot change that. It remains ignorant cope from people addicted to losing, who do NOT want a European far right to exist, because it would mean that have to get off their ass and do some activism.