Bloodbath

Plus: Space dining, Russian elections, Bernie Sanders’ 32-hour workweek, and more…

LIZ WOLFE

Now, though, each new Trump comment seems like a Rorschach. His “bloodbath” comment in Vandalia, Ohio, on Saturday is no exception, but perhaps indicative of how this campaign cycle is going to go.

Pearls were clutched up and down the Acela corridor: “Trump says country faces ‘bloodbath’ if Biden wins in November,” was how Politico chose to headline Trump’s remark. “Trump says some migrants are ‘not people’ and predicts a ‘blood bath’ if he loses,” was how The New York Times characterized the speech. And don’t even get me started on what various MSNBC commentators said. (OK, here’s one: “He was sending a call to his supporters to have a reprise of January 6,” said former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, who then compared Trump to Adolf Hitler.”

The “that’ll be the least of it” part sure is weird, but to totally remove the context—Trump was talking about tariffs and car manufacturing and loss of jobs—from the “bloodbath” comments strikes me as media malpractice. (More competent pundits might take the opportunity to point out how slapping big tariffs on foreign-manufactured cars would be bad policy, a point made repeatedly by Reason‘s Eric Boehm.)

Later, Trump said, “If this election isn’t won, I’m not sure that you’ll ever have another election in this country,” which strikes me (and others) as the more concerning soundbite than the one the media is seizing on. And he referred to illegal immigrants as “animals” in his speech, which doesn’t tell us anything new about what Trump believes, but sure isn’t aligned with what I value.

Still: The media chose not to focus on these chunks of the speech or on the actual trade policy Trump was promoting. Many mainstream publications did not even provide viewers and readers with full context so they could judge the comments themselves. This strikes me as a problem—one that’s been pointed out repeatedly over the last eight years—requiring some self-reflection that may unfortunately never come.

Fighting at Al Shifa: In Gaza, fighting has once again broken out at Al Shifa hospital, where the Israeli military says Hamas fighters are shooting from.

Back in November, the Israel Defense Force (IDF) decision to raid Al Shifa was controversial. Isreal said the hospital was being used as a Hamas command center and a means of covering the entrances to the terrorists’ underground tunnel network. (The November raid uncovered stockpiles of weapons hidden in MRI rooms as well as tunnel entrances on the grounds.)

The IDF is calling the new raid a “high-precision” operation, saying it is based on new intelligence that indicates senior Hamas militants are hiding out at the hospital. Still, it’s a high-risk operation with lots of potential to harm civilians—and some evidence that’s already happened.

“The hospital and the surrounding area house about 30,000 patients, medical workers and displaced civilians, and a number of people were killed and wounded, the [Hamas-controlled Gazan] health ministry said,” reports The New York Times. “It added that a fire had broken out at the gate of the complex, which caused some people to suffocate and made it difficult to reach those who were injured.”

Scenes from New York:

QUICK HITS

• “Who are currently the most influential thinkers/intellectuals on the Left?” asks Tyler Cowen over at Marginal Revolution.
• Check out this Bloomberg explainer on the end of Japan’s negative interest rates.
• Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) wants the government to establish a 32-hour workweek; National Review editors tearing the idea apart.
• High-end space dining is now a thing (if you’re willing to fork over half a million).
• “The Kremlin stage-managed Russia’s presidential vote over the weekend to send a singular message at home and abroad: that President Vladimir V. Putin’s support is overwhelming and unshakable, despite or even because of his war against Ukraine,” reports The New York Times‘ Paul Sonne.
• lol:

• This:

GET REASON MAGAZINE