Caste Systems, Forced Marriages, Book Burning, and Blasphemy Trials

Where? In Saudi Arabia? Iran? Afghanistan? Pakistan? No, in enlightened, progressive, tolerant and humane England, France, Finland, and Germany. Otherwise known as the agenda of Totalitarian Humanism.  As I have previously written:

The ultimate aim of multiculturalism is the creation of a totalitarian state ordered as a type of caste system where individual privilege is assigned on the basis of group identity and group privilege is assigned on the basis of the position of the group in the pantheon of the oppressed.

Here are some examples:

Thought Police Muscle Up in Britain 

In September 2006, a 14-year-old schoolgirl, Codie Stott, asked a teacher if she could sit with another group to do a science project as all the girls with her spoke only Urdu. The teacher’s first response, according to Stott, was to scream at her: “It’s racist, you’re going to get done by the police!”… According to her mother, she was placed in a bare cell for 3 1/2 hours. She was questioned on suspicion of committing a racial public order offence and then released without charge.

A 10-year-old child was arrested and brought before a judge, for having allegedly called an 11-year-old boya “Paki” and “bin Laden” during a playground argument at a primary school (the other boy had called him a skunk and a Teletubby). When it reached the court the case had cost taxpayers pound stg. 25,000.

So schoolgirls and children are being arrested for “crimes against the racial order”? Where have we seen that before?

A Book to be Burned 

Sarkozy Hints at Forced Interracial Marriages

Finnish Politician Prosecuted for Blasphemy 

German Court Convicts Man for Insulting Islam

Categories: Uncategorized

6 replies »

  1. What’s particularly nauseating about this bullshit is that its’ defenders view it as a vital and neccessary condition for a just society. They almost view “not being offended” as being a fundamental human right. Fuck these assholes.

  2. “They almost view “not being offended” as being a fundamental human right.”

    Yes! It’s for this reason that I call these assholes “the Moral Majority of the Left.” Their “arguments” remind me of Robert Bork’s claim that the state can rightfully prohibit homosexual relationships because other people are offended by knowing they take place.

  3. By the way, Keith, when I said once in my comment block that you were ok in my book, I wasn’t just being rhetorical. You have a consistent stance that I respect, even when I don’t agree with your particular strategic positions.
    I really did want to know where you were at when the rubber met the road, and you turned out to be one of the good guys.

  4. I’m familiar with BNP’s legal hassles concerning its membership requirements. Why not just require the Tories to accept Labourites as members or require the Catholic Church to accept Protestants? I actually like the UKIP better than the BNP, but laws interfering with the membership requirements of a party are essentially a ban on opposition parties.

Leave a Reply