Why We Are National-Anarchists

from Western Australian National-Anarchists (WANA)


To many people, on all sides of the political spectrum, the question would be asked when they hear of our new philosophy, “why?”.  Why would you choose to be a National-Anarchist, which is universally hated by the majority of the dogmatic left and right wings? Why would we choose to be ostracised from the mainstream like this? I will attempt to give as good an answer as i am able.

“He that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils” – Francis Bacon

For decades, both the left-wing and the right-wing have not developed their world-view. Anarchists are the same as they were 40 years as ago, along with the socialists, communists, nationalists, conservatives, liberals etc. Most people cling to 20th century beliefs and ideologies in the 21st century. To use 20th century beliefs in the 21st seems to be almost stupid, does it not?

“Smash all political dogma’s!” – slogan of the Australian New Right/ National Anarchists

For a small, but growing group of people, it does. Tired of the repeated failures of the reactionary right-wing, a small group of people split with those Nationalist groups and adopted Third Positionism, providing a Third Way alternative to the dual Communist and Capitalist dominated world of the time. However, as the Soviet Union fell, and Communism became relatively obsolete, and Capitalism marched onwards to world hegemony, a more revolutionary approach to the emerging NWO of global government, exploitation of the worlds workers, and submissiveness to the Elite, was needed.

Thus, National-Anarchism was born. With the Orwellian-like State oppression of dissidents, with the farce of so-called “Democracy”, party-politics has been discarded as a pipe-dream. The State and its vast apparatus of bureaucratic leeches (”politicians”) have become the only enemy of all freedom loving peoples the world over. But we do not advocate armed struggle against the State, as it is too powerful, instead we advocate living outside of the System, as far as is legal and we are able, and establishing (eventually) our own communities, according to our own customs and beliefs. (As Troy Southgate would say, “destroying from within, building from without”).

So why are we National-Anarchists? Well, we recognise there is a fundamental sickness in the heart of our current “civilisation”, and that our world-view offers the only real genuine alternative to this sickness. National-Anarchism is the synthesis to the Left-wing and the Right-wing, (and it must be pointed out that those labels only serve to make us conform to the Government labels, and originated centuries ago, so should surely be obsolete in the 21st century), providing the only real true revolutionary alternative to the radical youth of today.

Everyone has an option, either sit back and watch the world march on passed them, or live a life with more meaning, more value (not in the economic sense) by making positive changes in your community, and help preparing your community (which should be considered your extended family) for the inevitable collapse of Western Capitalism. For surely it will one day collapse, and then our people will need leaders to guide them out of the troubles to follow. Are you a leader? If you are – we want you!

Categories: Uncategorized

6 replies »

  1. Is national anarchism not merely a hybrid of reactionary cultural views and classical anarchism (not that there’s anything wrong with that)? Also, who is exactly is Alain De Benoist and what makes his “new right” ideology so compelling?

  2. National-Anarchism is not a hybrid of any ideology, its a comprehensive world-view unique to our time. Culture, along with tribe, are at the forefront of our world-view, but i would hardly call our culture-bearing philosophy “reactionary” as we do not look back to any golden age, or try and restore our country to a percieved golden age, most of us have rejected the judeo-christian foundations of the West and are part of the growing neo-pagan re-birth, how is that reactionary?
    As for classical Anarchism someone else can answer that as i am still learning, all i know is that Democracy and freedom can only exist in the smallest scale possible, i.e, the village/town/local community level, so that is what we strive for.
    As for De Benoist, do a search for his name and read his essays, he has some radical and controversial views. The New Right favours the dismantaling of modern day Nation-States in favour of tribal-nations. (I.e, UK to split into England, Wales, Ulster, Scotland, Cornwall, etc), amongst other things. If you want any links ask but the best thing to do would be to read for yourself.

  3. “Also, who is exactly is Alain De Benoist and what makes his “new right” ideology so compelling?”

    I’m not the best individual to answer this question, but IIRC, de Benoist was part of a group of right-wing French intellectuals who decided to rework nationalist and conservative ideas to fit a post-war Europe. Their attempts were of varying degrees of success, but what I find interesting abotu de Benoist is the way in which he took New Left ideas and applied them to Euro-nationalism. So, for example, he contextualises right-wing opposition to immigration with left-wing support for Third World countries; as he sees it, capitalism is the cause of mass immigration, and hence both should be opposed. In de Benoist’s worldview, the struggle of Europeans to preserve their identity is not the domain of violent skinheads and greasy crypto-fascist populists like Griffin or Le Pen, but goes hand-in-hand with the struggle of all peoples disenfranchised by modernity to preserve their unique identities.

  4. I think that the only solution for USA is the creation of a United Jeffersonian Workers Socialist Front with the traditions of humanist, egalitarian, and the benevolent-moralist, anti-oppression ideologies of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Eugene Debs, Upton Sinclair, Mark Twain, Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Hugo Chavez, Simon Bolivar. In order for American workers, peasants and exploited americans victims of this satanic capitalist system to take and reclaim the wealth of this country which is produced by them, but expropiated, and enjoyed by the top 1% to 5% of US citizens. We need to inform and teach US History, moralist values, Socialist values to american children in order to give them the weapons to protect themselves from tyranny and slavery when they grow up to be informed adults, to prevent this country being kidnapped by capitalist-mafia cartels like The Democrats and The Republican Party (2 mafia rings) which is what the US founding fathers warned people about. Many US presidents with white-hats and commonsense like Eisenhower and JFK warned this country about a fascist-cartel growing like a cancer within the Military Industrial Complex and the jewish owned Federal Reserve !

  5. The 28th President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, once warned his Nation…

    “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

    The 1st President of the United States, George Washington, further warned his Nation…

    “It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a Free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even of his personal services to the defense of it.”

    Unfortunately the American people have failed to heed either one of them as evidenced by their allowing the Nazi coup against Roosevelt to fade from their history books and the murder of Kennedy to go unanswered for.

    With such a people supposedly standing behind him, one does wonder how Obama can survive with only these cowards and idiots to protect and defend him, or why he would even want to.

    But, and as the great American President Abraham Lincoln once observed by saying

    “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”

    the ‘final chapter’ of this latest chapter in the ‘American Story’ is yet to be written, and maybe, just maybe, these poor souls will end up surprising us all again by willingly sacrificing themselves as individuals for the greater good of their Nation.

    The cost? Most assuredly high. The bloodshed? Beyond all description and measure to be sure. But as the great American Founding Father Thomas Jefferson once warned,

    “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

    Nietzsche was another who wrote about the need of tragic-heroes, revolutionary supermen:

    “The great men are necessary, the time in which they appear is accidental; that they almost always become masters over their age is only because they are stronger, because they are older, because for a longer time much was gathered for them.” -Twilight of the Idols

    “The human being who has become free and how much more the spirit who has become free spits on the contemptible type of well-being dreamed of by shopkeepers, Christians, cows, females, Englishmen, and other bourgeoise. The free man is a warrior. How is freedom measured in individuals and peoples? According to the resistance which must be overcome, according to the exertion required, to remain on top. The highest type of free men should be sought where the highest resistance is constantly overcome: five steps from tyranny, close to the threshold of the danger of servitude. This is true psychologically if by “tyrants” are meant inexorable and fearful instincts that provoke the maximum of authority and discipline against themselves; the most handsome type: Julius Caesar.”

    And Lenin another great revolutionary who with the help of the exploited Russians overthrew their exploiters and oppressors in the Russian Revolution:

    “The dictatorship of the proletariat is a stubborn struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative against the forces and traditions of the old society. The dictatorship of the proletariat is the instrument of the proletarian revolution, its organ, its most important mainstay, brought into being for the purpose of, firstly, crushing the resistance of the overthrown exploiters and consolidating the achievements of the proletarian revolution, and secondly, carrying the revolution to the complete victory of socialism. Soviet power as the state form of the dictatorship of the proletariat. The victory of the dictatorship of the proletariat signifies the suppression of the bourgeoisie, the smashing of the bourgeois state machine and the substitution of proletarian democracy for bourgeois democracy.”

    Therefore, Lenin is right in saying: “The proletarian revolution is impossible without the forcible destruction of the bourgeois state machine and the substitution for it of a new one” (see Vol. XXIII, P. 342)

    The time for battle is upon them all, even if they fail to see it.

    Unfortunately the American people have failed to heed either one of them as evidenced by their allowing the capitalist coup de etat against Roosevelt to fade from their history books and the murder of Kennedy to go unanswered for.

    Let other people you know learn about socialism! Spread the word… the more people who know the truth, the greater the force against the capitalist system! Resistance forever!

    Here are a good links toward the introduction of socialist ideology (The only solution for the United States):



    ……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
    ……….”…………. _.·´


  6. To “Living in USA makes us Fat”:

    What exactly does any of that have to do with the topic at hand?


    Why are you promoting Marxism on an anarchist blog?

Leave a Reply