| The latest clashes are being blamed on some deliberately vague language in the ceasefire deal that the two countries inked earlier this month. “The memorandum that the two sides agreed to calls for Iran to ‘make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels’ through the Strait of Hormuz for 60 days. Crucially, it leaves ‘arrangements’ and ‘best efforts’ undefined,” reports The New York Times.
Adding to the ambiguity, the country of Oman (which lies on the opposite bank of the strait) has been working with the International Maritime Organization to open a new shipping channel near its shores. But Iran believes the ceasefire deal gives it the power to determine the “arrangements” for vessels to transit the strait, so it fired upon a ship using the Oman-adjacent channel.
This disagreement may turn out to involve time as well as space. The ceasefire deal requires that Iran not charge tolls to ships passing through Hormuz for 60 days, but the U.S. seems determined on a permanent restoration of free navigation—the condition that existed before the war began.
If the early reports of a renewed ceasefire deal prove to be true, that’s good news. But it is clear that, unlike the geography of the strait itself, the two sides remain far apart in long-term peace talks.
So the war continues to drag along, despite being deeply unpopular, facing increasing congressional pushback, and resulting in few if any actual accomplishments.
FedGPT. The government is asserting the power to decide who gets to use the newest versions of some advanced AI platforms.
“ChatGPT-maker OpenAI said Friday that the U.S. government would initially approve who gets access to its latest new release while AI companies and the administration work out a longer-term plan for regulation on the sector,” The Washington Post reports. “Hours later, the Commerce Department sent a letter to rival AI developer Anthropic, telling the company it would be allowed to provide its own latest AI model, Mythos 5, only to a restricted list of U.S.-based companies.”
In a statement, OpenAI said it didn’t “believe this kind of government access process should become the long-term default. It keeps the best tools from users, developers, enterprises, cyber defenders, and global partners who need them.” But the company says it is complying with the government’s request while rolling out its new Sol, Tera, and Luna models.
After initially taking a relatively hands-off approach to A.I. development, the Trump administration seems to be reversing course. |