| ◼ In a pair of opinions by Justice Samuel Alito and one by Justice Clarence Thomas, a 6–3 majority of the Supreme Court extended the Trump administration’s winning streak on immigration law issues. One opinion affirmed what many lower courts have ignored: Congress has barred judicial review when the executive withdraws Temporary Protected Status from nationals of particular foreign countries. In the other case, which challenged an Obama-era policy, the Court decided that authorities can block aliens from reaching a U.S. port of entry and therefore from applying for asylum. The law allows only aliens who have arrived in the United States to apply. Alito had to explain that “in” means in: “In ordinary speech, no one would say that a person ‘arrives in’ a place . . . before the person enters that place.” Finally, regarding the third case, Thomas concluded that a lawful permanent resident can be found to have “committed” a crime and barred from admission to the U.S. even if he or she has not yet been convicted of the crime. The statute, he pointed out, referred to convictions as a basis for review of on-the-spot decisions at the border: “One does not commit a conviction.” In all, a good reminder that law should be read as written.
◼ Blue states’ resistance to the Second Amendment can sometimes take comical proportions. Of course property owners can keep guns off their land if they choose: The right to exclude is what makes property private. Hawaii, however, tried to leverage that into a state law that would criminalize carrying guns on any private property unless the property owner explicitly permits doing so. The state supreme court argued that the Second Amendment doesn’t mean the same thing in Hawaii as it does in the rest of the country. The U.S. Supreme Court, in yet another 6–3 opinion written by Justice Alito, didn’t buy it. Absurdly, Hawaii tried to defend its law by invoking the Black Codes, which restricted the gun rights of black citizens in the South during Reconstruction. But the 14th Amendment, which has been read to extend the Bill of Rights (including the Second Amendment) to the states, was enacted in part because an outraged Congress wanted to stamp out the Black Codes. Alito was justly scornful: “Unless we put history entirely out of our minds, Hawaii’s claim that this tainted artifact illuminates the original understanding of the right to keep and bear arms cannot be taken seriously.”
◼ British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s decision to step down will come as a relief to many, including in the Labour Party. The government Starmer led was infected by authoritarianism, demonstrated most notoriously by its fondness for online censorship. Britain’s big government has grown bigger, free speech’s domain has grown smaller, private schools are fewer, the long march of the left through the institutions has continued, and multiculturalism and “net-zero” trundle destructively along. Even though a general election need not be called for another three years, Labour’s collapse in the polls has panicked its MPs. The best bet (for now) is that the party will entrust Andy Burnham, a smooth-talking Labour highflier, with that distinctly tricky task. The political honeymoon that he or any other new leader will enjoy is likely to be short-lived. In the meantime, Starmer remains at 10 Downing Street until the selection of his successor. This might take until September, leaving Britain in the care of the lamest of lame ducks at a treacherous time.
◼ An independent group of British MPs released the Rape Gang Inquiry Report, a damning collection of victim testimonies that vividly portray the sexual terrorism that “grooming gangs” in the United Kingdom perpetrated for decades. The girls, sometimes as young as eleven, told of being raped daily, drugged, beaten, burned, racially abused, trafficked throughout the country, forced to convert to Islam, and coerced into Islamic marriages. In some cases, the sexual abuse was filmed and distributed, then used as blackmail against the children. What’s more alarming still is that the British government was not clueless about these atrocities. Nearly every British institution—including the police, social services, and the health-care system—had been made aware of the gangs, yet they failed to appropriately intervene. Why? As the report puts it, Britain has succumbed to a dangerous ideology that emphasizes “diversity, inclusion, and non-judgementalism as supreme virtues.” Pursuing justice for the girls would have revealed uncomfortable demographic trends—namely, that South Asian men are vastly overrepresented among the perpetrators. The report cites a previous estimate that there have been 250,000 victims of rape gangs in Britain, but it emphasizes that this figure is a “bare minimum.” Unfortunately, it is unlikely that we will ever uncover the exact number of victims and identify every offender. As the report soberly concludes: “Until the country rejects the fear of being called ‘racist’ and restores the courage to name uncomfortable truths, the conditions that allowed these networks to thrive will remain.” |