| ◼ Ms. Wiles, you have our phone number, right?
◼ President Donald Trump is never one to settle for mere overstatement when he can reach for outlandish exaggeration instead. This quality was on full display in his most recent address from the White House, in which he sometimes sounded like an excitable caller on C-SPAN’s Republican line. Trump argued that the nation was on the verge of a collapse during the Biden administration and now, under his stewardship, is experiencing successes like “no one has ever seen.” Clearly, though, the occasion for the address was the public discontent over the economy, which has dragged down the president’s poll numbers and threatens to sweep in a Democratic congressional majority next year. The basic problem for Trump is threefold. First, the price increases under Biden mean that goods are still more expensive than they used to be, even if the inflation rate is lower than the Biden-era peak. It is true that rising wages—and tax cuts—can put more money in people’s wallets and counteract the effect of the higher prices, but this will take time. Second, the Trump tariffs are making goods more expensive while their chaotic rollout has created great uncertainty for businesses. Third, Trump has refused to acknowledge that prices are still going up. If nothing else, Trump’s speech shows that the White House realizes the political challenge it faces on the economy. Ultimately, it is economic conditions that will determine how the issue plays out, regardless of the president’s exceedingly harsh or boundlessly self-glorifying words.
◼ On the first night of Hanukkah, a father-and-son team of Islamist terrorists armed with rifles and IEDs attacked an outdoor celebration on Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia. Fifteen Jews were killed, including two rabbis, a ten-year-old girl, and an 87-year-old Holocaust survivor. Dozens more remain injured. Police killed one killer; the other is in custody. We wish we could say this horrific event was shocking, but unfortunately, it is not. Just this month, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry warned about the rising tide of antisemitism, with annual incidents now five times what they were prior to the October 7 massacres. The response by the Australian government has been to accommodate the anti-Israel mob while failing to protect Jewish communities. In August, the government allowed antisemitic protesters to shut down traffic on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, and then Labor Prime Minister Anthony Albanese recognized a Palestinian state. The shooters were identified as Naveed Akram and his father, the Pakistani-born Sajid Akram, who came to Australia in 1998 on a student visa. One would think such an egregious tragedy would make Australia rethink its immigration policies, its response to antisemitism, or its strategy of accommodating the pro-Hamas mob. Instead, Albanese has announced that Australia, which has among the toughest gun laws in the world, is going to impose even tougher restrictions on legal gun ownership. Albanese expressed horror at the attack. What did he think the mob meant by “globalize the intifada”?
◼ The Department of Energy extended a $1 billion loan to Constellation Energy, an electric utility, to restart the undamaged nuclear reactor at Three Mile Island. In 1979, the Pennsylvania facility was the site of the most infamous nuclear accident in U.S. history when one of its reactors partially melted down, releasing radioactive substances. Three Mile Island terrified the public. Regulators seized the opportunity to impose a blizzard of ever-shifting rules on nuclear energy, making the cost of plant construction virtually prohibitive. Yet these fears were never justified. The meltdown at Three Mile Island had no measurable health effects on either plant employees or surrounding residents. When properly operated, nuclear power stations remain remarkably safe. The Trump administration is right to switch Three Mile Island back on. Better still would be broad, industry-wide deregulation and permitting reform that could unleash the full potential of nuclear power.
◼ For most of Trump’s second term, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles has avoided controversy. But that quiet service ended dramatically when Vanity Fair published a long profile of her. In it, Wiles sharply criticizes other members of the administration. She calls Vice President JD Vance a conspiracy theorist, labels Elon Musk an “odd duck,” and says that Attorney General Pam Bondi “completely whiffed” the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. After the article was published, Wiles responded by calling it “a disingenuously framed hit piece on me and the finest President, White House staff, and Cabinet in history.” It is extremely difficult to believe that Wiles, a longtime aide to Trump, was fooled into granting eleven on-the-record interviews for an article that she thought would laud the administration. Similarly unbelievable is that Vanity Fair somehow also managed to trick Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, and other senior officials to sit down for a photo shoot. One explanation is that Wiles is spectacularly naïve. Another is that she knew exactly what she was doing by putting out a narrative that she is the levelheaded manager who is trying to keep the administration on the right path while surrounded by loose cannons and incompetents. |