| Careful observers will remember that this isn’t the first bout of legal trouble the president’s failson has gotten into. “In September, he was indicted in Delaware on three charges stemming from his illegal purchase of a handgun in 2018, a period when he used drugs heavily and was prohibited from owning a firearm,” reports The New York Times. (More on the government’s combo drug-gun war from Reason‘s Jacob Sullum.)
“If Hunter’s last name was anything other than Biden, the charges in Delaware, and now California, would not have been brought,” said Abbe Lowell, Biden’s lawyer. This is, of course, patently absurd; if anything, Hunter has received more lenient treatment—including a cushy job and plenty of money to spend on, ahem, ATM withdrawals—because of his familial connections.
“There is now a very real prospect that President Biden’s son will be defending himself in two federal criminal trials during a presidential election year—as Mr. Trump, his father’s likely opponent, confronts the possibility of two federal criminal trials in his classified documents and election interference cases,” reports The New York Times.
Fallout: Liz Magill, who served as president of the University of Pennsylvania for less than two years, just resigned following pressure from the board and a dicey congressional hearing in which her answers regarding free speech and antisemitism on campus were deemed unsatisfactory.
Harvard’s president, Claudine Gay, is facing similar pressure. The Harvard Corporation, which has the power to fire the president it appointed less than a year ago, will meet later today. “Gay, who had previously faced only a few isolated calls to resign from the presidency, has received mounting pressure to step down,” reports The Harvard Crimson. “On Friday, more than 70 members of Congress—including two Democrats—signed a letter to Harvard governance calling on Gay to resign.”
Meanwhile, The New York Times still somehow managed to eke out a “Republicans pounce” headline as if that’s the real story: “As fury erupts over campus antisemitism, conservatives seize the moment.” But I don’t think that’s really the right framing for this: When university administrators who spent the better part of the last decade policing microaggressions are suddenly totally fine with student groups drawing Hamas paragliders on their poster art, you should focus on them rather than their critics. (The correct approach, of course, is for administrators to permit all kinds of speech, even if it means refusing to coddle students.) |