The dispute between the ADL and X is not new.
Ever since Musk took over the platform late last year, the civil rights organization has accused the company of allowing hateful and antisemitic speech to proliferate through overly lax content moderation policies and practices.
The ADL was one of the groups reporting a dramatic rise in the use of racist and homophobic slurs on Twitter after Musk’s acquisition. It also complained that the company was now less responsive to its requests to remove content.
Back in December 2022, Reason‘s Jacob Sullum argued that the rise in hate speech reported by the ADL and others was being exaggerated. The few thousand additional tweets containing racist and antisemitic slurs were still a tiny fraction of the content on the site.
Nevertheless, the ADL has continued to pressure X to be more aggressive in taking down what it deems hateful content. In a report published last month, the ADL even accused the social media site of running a “hate machine” for suggesting people follow accounts that have tweeted antisemitic content and memes.
The ADL, alongside other civil rights groups, had participated in other pressure campaigns aimed at getting advertisers to leave Facebook over its (supposedly) lax content moderation. In recent years, critics of the ADL also have accused it of being overly partisan and using dodgy methodology to inflate the number of antisemitic incidents it tracks.
In July, X sued the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate over what it claims were baseless accusations of failing to police hate speech.
Musk surely has some cause to dispute a lot of the claims the ADL is making about X. His company is within its rights to decline the group’s content moderation demands. Nevertheless, the ADL is also well within its rights to argue Musk is running a “hate machine” and lobbying advertisers to take their business elsewhere. By threatening legal action against the group, Musk is ceding whatever moral high ground he may have had as a defender of free speech.
Instead, he’s suggesting he might use the court system to bully the group into silencing their criticism of his company. That’s hardly the action of a “free speech absolutist.” |
Leaving in consideration how much ADL likes to call everyone an anti semite (from going from being an anti zionist to being an intactivist,) they had it coming.
And, if I recall correctly, they loved to use anti defametion laws in their favor too.