The Super PAC is just one example of the nominally Democratic candidate running a campaign that’s awash in support from backers of Donald Trump

Read more | Join the discussion

‘Significant breach of fitness’: Oregon city mayor faces heat after equating Pride flags to swastikas

The local leader recently shared Facebook post featuring “an image of four Pride flags positioned to look like a swastika,”

Read more | Join the discussion

The Weird Sleeper Issue Biden Is Betting on for His Re-Election

If Democrats have their way, a consumer issue could end up being a lot more important than Republicans think.

Read more | Join the discussion

California strikes huge deal unlocking billions for health care

Months of negotiations among the state’s top health care players have ended in a plan to pump billions into Medicaid and struggling hospitals.

Read more | Join the discussion

Kansas Attorney General Seeks To Deny Trans Birth Certificate Changes

Republican Kris Kobach is asking a federal court to give the state power to refuse requests from transgender people.

Read more | Join the discussion

3 San Antonio police officers charged with murder after fatal shooting

“The officers’ actions were not consistent with SAPD’s policy and training,” said Chief William McManus during a Friday night news conference.

Read more | Join the discussion

Analysts Say Solar Is Saving Texans From Widespread Power Outages Amid Extreme Heat

“Renewables are definitely saving the grid and saving our wallets,” said one independent energy analyst.

Read more | Join the discussion

In December 2019, the White House signed an executive order to accept The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) Definition of Antisemitism in order to combat the hostility, discrimination, and violent antisemitism that Jews have been facing under the guise of anti-Zionism in recent years. This IHRA Definition was adopted by 31 states, plus the District of Columbia. The purpose of this definition was to deter people from attacking Jews indirectly by attacking the State of Israel with propaganda designed to delegitimize it, isolate it from the West, and call for its destruction.

This IHRA Definition was adopted due to a wave of antisemitism that has swept through the left wing in the United States and Europe. This hate speech disguised itself as being “merely” anti-Zionist rhetoric, while in reality it is hate speech against the Jewish People. Claims that Zionism is separate from Judaism are false, because Zionism is fundamental to Judaism in every way, and the vast majority of Jews in the world are Zionist. Therefore, rhetorical attacks on the Jewish State, which is the only Jewish State in the entire world, and the only liberal democracy in the entire Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, are actually highly antisemitic.

Jews have one tiny little piece of land to call home (about the size of New Jersey), while the MENA region is approximately the size of the United States, and contains an equivalent population. Why then, couldn’t the Arab nations absorb the Palestinian people into their countries after Arab genocidal attacks against Israel had failed? Why did those same Arab countries deny Palestinians citizenship for the express purpose of maintaining indefinite refugee status intended to artificially exacerbate the issue of Palestinian return to Israeli lands? Why was Israel, on the other hand, able to absorb almost a million Jews who were ethnically cleansed from the MENA region by the Arabs, and lost their lands (which were 5 times the size of Israel), their businesses, their homes, their money, and all their assets? Why were those Jewish refugees not granted a right of return to their homes, and compensated for the tens of billions of dollars (if not more) in losses, due to this traumatic event? This event is conspicuously absent from the Israeli-Arab conflict debate.

If Christians and Muslims have many options to move to countries in which they can live in peace, why can’t the Jews have a small piece of land to call their own, especially since they are now living in their ancestral homeland, to which they are 100% indigenous?

Read more