One question that I’m interested in is what the cultural framework of hegemonic anarchism would look like. I think it’s clear the political aspect would more or less be a world of free cities, micronations, federated bottom-up imperiums, millets, eco-villages, intentional communities,  communes, diffused networks,  etc. But I wonder if there would be a singular hegemonic culture in the same way that the hegemony of liberal democracy was accompanied by the cultural dominance of a combination of bourgeois-Protestantism, Enlightenment rationalism, and unitary nation-states. If so, would it be the Left’s desire for “worldwide wokeness”? Would it be Hoppe’s bourgeois conservatism or the N-As anti-tech traditionalism? Or would there be “ultra-diversity” with no singular cultural center (like the diversity of Christian church denominations, restaurants, or pre-modern cultures)? Or would there be extreme dichotomies (technophobia vs technophilia, individualism vs collectivism, puritanism vs libertinism) as opposed to the bland centrism that tends to dominate liberal societies? Or would it be all of these depending on pre-existing cultural, historical, geographical, or technological factors?

A reader offers the following answer: