Yes, There Really Is A City With No Cops! 4

There are many such prototypes for anarchistic, voluntarist, or self-determined communities all over the world: Marinaleda, Christiania, Twin Oaks, Mondragon, Orania, Emilia-Romagna, and many others. Anarchists do not need to invent other-worldly utopias. We just need to expand the models that we already have. Two, three many Marinaleda’s!!!!!

By Jackson Marciana

CounterCurrentsNews.Com

marinaleda-no-police

Can we have peace in the streets without police patrolling us? One city has proven that we can.

For more than 30 years now, the city of Marinaleda has termed itself a “utopia for peace”. They have absolutely no municipal police, which has saved its citizens $350,000 a year.

Every few weeks, community volunteers clean the streets or do odd jobs without anyone forcing them to. A lot of people have termed the city “socialist” or “communist,” but the city’s high level of voluntary community service shows that while the town does describe itself as socialist, it doesn’t neatly fit into pre-determined pigeonholes, with significant levels of voluntary community service, not compelled by law.

On the surface, the Spanish town appears indistinguishable from any other in the area.

The city is located in Spain’s poorest and most southern Andalusian province. While the city might be a utopia for peace, it is situated in a region with employment so high that it could be characterized as anything but utopian. Unemployment and poverty are through the roof, at a staggering 37%, with 55% of youths unemployed. But that is actually somewhat lower than the average for surrounding cities.

But let’s not get hung up on the dismal economy of the city, because that isn’t really the point. What we should pay attention to is that even with rampant poverty, the city is not overflowing with violent crime.

Police are not present and police are not needed.

This may sound strange to some, until we examine the pages of history and realize that community policing is itself a modern phenomenon. It was in 1829 that Sir Robert Peel established the Metropolitan Police Force for London based at Scotland Yard. Peel had only drafted the idea for community policing in 1812. It was still some time after that before police hit the streets of the United States.

We have been conditioned to think that without police, our societies would fall apart. But the historical reality is that we have only had police for a very short period of human history. Now, one city is showing us that we can still do without them.

Whether you support the City of Marinaleda’s politics across the board or not, there is little denying that they have demonstrated another way for peace in the community, besides militarized law enforcement patrolling, looking for trouble.

4 comments

  1. I’m sure there are communities of Amish, Mennonites, Hutterites and ultra-Orthodox Jews that don’t have police. This town in Spain clearly enforces ideological conformity, so it’s not that different from intentional religious communities.

  2. Well, that’s the point. A community organized on the basis of consensus does so because it has shared values, customs, beliefs and goals. Where the police come in is when some people are trying to impose their values on others.

    “I’m sure there are communities of Amish, Mennonites, Hutterites and ultra-Orthodox Jews that don’t have police.”

    Those communities are self-managed on the basis of their shared religious values. Christiania is self-managed on the basis of its shared leftist countercultural values. Orania is self-managed on the basis of its conservative Afrikaaner values. Presumably the same would be true of a PC community organized on anti-oppression/safe space/trigger warning/anti-microagression principles, or a libertarian community organized on the non-aggression principle, or mutualist community organized on mutualist values, or a libertarian municipalist community organized on libertartarian municipalist values, or indigenous communities organized on indigenous values.

  3. Interesting stuff. People being people, there will be disputes. Are there tribunals for adjudicating these disputes? When a tribunal hears evidence and renders a final judgment, is the judgment enforceable, or is it merely a suggestion? In other words, are the judges arbitrators, or mere mediators? If the former, then whose job is it to enforce the judgments of the tribunals? (“Judge said you get the cat and the car. I get the dog and the house. Now will you leave voluntarily? Or do I get a writ of execution issued and placed in the hands of the constable who will physically move your stuff out to the curb?”)

    Just trying to imagine how disputes – be they personal or business – will be handled when there is no state.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s