Culture Wars/Current Controversies

Man Facing Charges For Not Being Mauled By Bear

Political Outcast

A 76-year-old Auburn, Massachusetts man Richard Ahlstrand had spotted a black  bear in his backyard last Thursday around his bird feeders. On Friday, he went  to fill up his bird feeders, and as a precaution, he took his shotgun. Sure  enough, the black bear showed up and started to chase the old man. The man aimed  his shotgun at the bear and shot it, killing  the bear before it dropped to the ground.

Now, he’s facing charges for illegally killing the bear, illegally baiting  the bear, illegal possession of a firearm and failure to secure a weapon.  Because he “murdered” the bear, police confiscated  his shotgun as well as 2 others he had in his possession.

Mr. Ahlstrand pointed out the idiocy of his elected officials:

“They got me set up now like I’m some kind  of murderer.  And then the environmental guy told me, ‘You should have  called me instead of shooting it.’  What was I going to do, say ‘Mister  Bear, would you excuse me please while I go make a phone call?’”

Authorities thought that the bear may have had cubs, but as Ahlstrand  told the local CBS affiliate, if he hadn’t shot the bear, he may not be here  today. He was sure it would have at least mauled him. Ahlstrand recalled that  the bear was about 7 feet tall when it stood on its hind legs, and he estimated  it weighed around 300 or 400 pounds.

From the bureaucrats’ perspective, this old man “baited” the bear with  birdseed. Because we all know that bird seed is only used to bait bears,  hopefully a female bear with cubs, for the purpose of killing it. He wasn’t  actually using it to feed birds.

As for the illegal possession of a firearm, maybe the man didn’t have a  Firearms Identification Card. That’s what they call the permit that’s required  in order to purchase a non-large capacity rifle or shotgun. Never mind the fact  that he was protecting himself from a large, savage beast on his own property.  What’s relevant is the fact that he didn’t have the proper government  license.

As for the failure to secure a weapon, how else is one supposed to use a  firearm at all without picking it up, aiming it and pulling the trigger? So you  can have a gun in Massachusetts, but you have to make sure it’s inoperable and  completely useless?

We’re not talking about a human being that was shot and killed for being on  his property. We’re talking about a bear. An animal.

This is like what  happened in Texas of all places not too long ago. A white-winged dove hit  the window of a man’s house and fell to the ground dead. The man was a chef, so  he used the incident as an opportunity to show others how to prepare dove. He  made the mistake of posting pictures on his blog of the bird being prepared.  This got him in trouble with the wildlife and game department who claimed he  didn’t have the proper permit to do what he did with the dead bird, and that he  should have contacted wildlife and game so that they could properly dispose of  the bird’s carcass.

I’m surprised the wildlife and game official didn’t charge the chef for  illegally baiting the dove with a glass window.

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/04/man-facing-charges-for-not-being-mauled-by-bear/#ixzz2Q3lsy8We

Leave a Reply