Totalitarian Humanism Strikes in Belgium 16

While it may be un-PC to be anti-immigration, not even the immigrants get to defy totalitarian humanism.

“It’s also a question of human dignity. The full face veil turns a woman into a walking prison.”

Women will be fined £110 for the first offence.

If they refuse to pay or are caught a second time, they can be jailed for a week.

Does this make any sense whatsoever?


16 comments

  1. Political-correctness has to be the biggest ideological cluster-fuck of the post-war period. It’s basic components are fragmenting and turning against each other: “do we support the gays and the wimminz against the Muslims, or vice versa? Is it racist to be against hijabs, or is it sexist *not* to be against the hijab? Is it ok to want to oppose Muslim immigration because Muslims aren’t technically a race, so it’s not racist, so it’s ok? Why does everyone with a functioning cerebral cortex wish we’d just fuck off and leave them alone?”

  2. Jim Goad has made the exact same point that Luke just did. The leftards, by focusing all the world’s evils on one singular source i.e. the “straight white Christian male” live peacefully under the delusion that all their favored victim groups are natural allies and would have no problems with each other. However, as that begins to unravel, so will their hegemony, This is what they get for following pre-packaged dogma uncritically instead of reasoned analysis.

  3. I suspect liberalism’s “coalition of the officially oppressed” will last another few decades and then start to fall apart. Several things will trigger its demise. One will be the natural incompatibility of its component parts. Another will be that as political correctness to continue to bear its fangs, more and more people will turn against it. Lastly, demographic realities will start to hit home and give a lot of people a wake-up call.

  4. Keith,

    Precisely. As the ideology becomes increasingly authoritarian, it will start turning people off from it and closer to our direction. People in general don’t appreciate what being told they can and can’t say and think, and those that attempt to do so will earn the blunt of their wrath. However, I see pc’s rise in currency as ultimately beneficial to our side, as the stronger our enemy the greater our reason d’etrie (think of how Nietzsche welcomed the continued popularity of Christianity for the same reason.)

  5. “The leftards, by focusing all the world’s evils on one singular source i.e. the “straight white Christian male” live peacefully under the delusion that all their favored victim groups are natural allies and would have no problems with each other.”

    On some lefty forum I used to post on years ago (urban75, if it’s even still going), there was a girl who expressed sincere astonishment that black people could be homophobic.

  6. “On some lefty forum I used to post on years ago (urban75, if it’s even still going), there was a girl who expressed sincere astonishment that black people could be homophobic.”

    Apparently, she had never spent much time around any “actually existing black people.”

    Btw, I use the phrase “actually existing black people” as a parody of the old neo-Marxist line about “actually existing socialism.” At one point, while Soviet and East European communism was still intact (if it could be called that), neo-Marxists would refer it as “actually existing socialism” which was either bad, not so good, or at least less than optimal as opposed their preferred brand of utopian Marxism where everything turns out wonderfully.

    Likewise, I like to make fun of white “anti-racist” leftists who have these wild fantasies of what black people are (super-noble creatures whose innate virtue shines through in their courageous struggle against oppression) as opposed to what black people actually are (ordinary human beings with ordinary human characteristics, good and bad, like people of any other race).

  7. Keith,

    Your satirical term is well appreciated. I was, for a short while, writing a short independent film with a parody of a white middle class college scene leftist as the main character. Unfortunately, due to budgetary constraints, it never saw fruition.

    Of course, this works both ways. I wonder what the response of shocked leftards would be upon the realization that some “LGBT” people can be racially bigoted?

  8. “I wonder what the response of shocked leftards would be upon the realization that some “LGBT” people can be racially bigoted?”

    That’s one of the things that’s going to blow the PC coalition out of the water eventually, i.e., when the Left finally starts to realize that the majority of their idealized “people of color” and a super-majority of their preferred Third World immigrants really don’t have all that much “sensitivity” towards “LGBT issues.” In fact, that’s one of the reasons that gay marriage keeps running into trouble in California. I’ve seen some stats that show minority voters are much less sympathetic to gay marriage than whites in some states.

    LOL, some years ago I came across some material from a group called the National Socialist League that was around in California in the 70s. It was a group of gay neo-nazis, and their material was talking about how the Jews and the Communists were using homophobia to create a wedge between heterosexual and homosexual Aryans. I showed it to some leftist-PC types of my acquaintance and they were absolutely blown away.

    At one point, I showed news article to a feminist-Marxist colleague of mine that described how 25% of self-identified homosexuals voted for Bush in the 2004 election. Her mouth dropped wide open and for a minute I thought she was going to faint.

    As one who once strongly identified with the radical Left, it was experiences like this that pushed me away from that milieu. I started asking myself, “What would a society actually run by these people be like?” and concluded it would be a total nuthouse that made Jonestown look sane in comparison. Now that this stuff is becoming more and more “normal” we’re starting to find out.

  9. If we’re turning into the PC Left’s version of Jonestwon, then Mark Potok, I would assume, is the Jim Jones figure. I wonder when he’s gonna have anti-fa and all the rest drink the kool-aid…

  10. “LOL, some years ago I came across some material from a group called the National Socialist League that was around in California in the 70s. It was a group of gay neo-nazis, and their material was talking about how the Jews and the Communists were using homophobia to create a wedge between heterosexual and homosexual Aryans.”

    That sounds fucking hilarious! Are there any scans of it online?

  11. I found that stuff in a book that reprinted material of extremist groups in the U.S. I don’t even remember what the book was called. As to any of it being online, I found this:

    http://www.debatepolitics.com/archives/3128-national-socialist-league.html

    It’s also mentioned by the SPLC (of course): http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2000/fall/the-fringe-of-the-fringe

    Here’s an amusing discussion of gay Nazis from some nutty right-wing Christians:

    http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/080515

    http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/Chapter8.htm

  12. There are two reasons for that. One is that in popular sentiment and official public morality alike, Nazism has become symbolic of ultimate evil, even though it was really no different from Stalinism, Maoism, Pol Potism, Genghis Khanism, all of the tyrannies of the ancient world. The only difference is that it’s both in recent history, and there aren’t nearly as many former Nazi sympathizers running around with egg on their faces as their are former or not-so-former Commie sympathizers.

    But the other reason is that many proto-types for what we see in modern society can be found in German National Socialism. They were one of the first massive welfare states. They had some of earliest public crusades against smoking. The police state model they were pioneers in creating has since been adopted by many other states. They had gun control. They had the same pathological obsession with health as do our modern therapeutic states. They just called it “eugenics,” while we called it “public health.” There were plenty of homosexuals in the early Nazi movement, though much of that was purged later on. The “anti-racism” hysteria of today is not too far removed from their “pro-racism” hysteria. Richard Lawrence Miller has documented pretty well the similarities between the Nazi police state built up around the enforcement of racial law, and America’s War on Drugs. The Nazi regime went to war under false pretenses (see George W. Bush). Then there is the corporate state, and military-industrial complex, and the vast network of prisons in the US. There are plenty of other similarities.

    Of course, we could also make comparisons between certain things that are going on today and Soviet Communism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s