| ◼ Violent protests are a French tradition. The latest round of rioting in the country, however, is proving to be unusually destructive. The rioters are supposedly animated by frustration with France’s underfunded schools. But burning down or attacking schools is an unorthodox way of improving them. Moreover, the disorder, which is being encouraged by leftist agitators who long ago left the classroom, threatens to spread further. Adding to the mess are rumblings of unease in the financial markets. France’s economy is burdened by debt and rampant spending. If it wishes to avoid greater difficulties, the government must restore order and then turn to its problematic budget. Yet France’s presidential candidates provide little cause for optimism. In a recent speech, one presidential hopeful, former Prime Minister Gabriel Attal, called for yet more economic integration with the EU. France’s alleged centrists remain incapable of addressing the disaster they have done so much to create.
◼ Spain’s far-left prime minister Pedro Sánchez has been trailing in the polls, not least because of his permissive immigration policy and persistent (and persistently denied) allegations of corruption against his inner circle. He used the uproar over the eviction of María del Carmen Abascal from her rented home to call a snap election in November that will be focused, he hopes, on Spain’s housing crisis. The 87-year-old’s landlords relented, but the old woman died before she could return home. The housing shortage is real enough, but it is in no small part due to the population increase brought about by immigration, a detail Sánchez must hope that voters will overlook. Sánchez may be calculating that increased support for the populist-right Vox party will scare off centrist voters and hand him a victory he does not deserve.
◼ Mass immigration in various European countries has added sectarian poison to their already toxic political situations. The left has long benefited from the votes of migrants and their descendants. It now appears increasingly willing to accept Islamists as well, as demonstrated by the U.K. Labour Party’s increasing hostility to Israel. This process has gone even further within Britain’s Greens. Once a small party of herbivores, it is now a party of the radical left that is well on the way to becoming a vehicle for Islamist voters. This grim degeneration was evident at this month’s party conference, where a motion was passed declaring the Greens’ opposition to Zionism and calling for the “establishment of a single democratic state throughout historic Palestine.” This has drawn protests within the party, but whether they will make any difference is unclear. Either way, Britain is on a dangerous route.
◼ In November 2023, United Airlines suspended a pilot, Ibrahim R. Mossallam, for social-media posts lauding the Hamas terrorists who perpetrated the October 7 attacks as “brave people” and celebrating the massacre as a display of “resistance” to the “Zionist regime.” He was reinstated six months later but has now, for unclear reasons, been suspended again. The airline should be cautious about putting him back in the air. If there’s a lesson to be learned from the recent attempted hijacking of a FlyDubai jet, it’s that people with Islamist sympathies should be kept as far away from cockpits as possible.
◼ Paramount’s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery was finally completed after twelve states settled their antitrust lawsuit against the deal. After Warner Bros. put itself on the market, the Trump administration pressured shareholders to sell the company to Paramount rather than Netflix, implicitly threatening the latter suitor with a legal challenge. A coalition of Democratic attorneys general ended up suing Paramount instead. To clear the merger, Paramount promised California—the lead state in the suit and home to both studios—that it would invest $1.5 billion in domestic projects, meet a minimum quota of movie releases each year, and refrain from selling its historic studio lots. It’s unclear how any of these requirements relate to fair competition. More likely, blue states are picking up Trump’s habit of exploiting antitrust law to pursue an unconstrained industrial policy.
◼ Christa Pike was 18 in 1995 when she and her boyfriend tortured and murdered 19-year-old Colleen Slemmer. The crime earned Pike the death penalty and, on September 30, 2026, the State of Tennessee tried to carry out her sentence. But the execution by lethal injection was twice unsuccessful, and Pike survived. She has since been receiving medical care, and her ordeal has reignited the national debate over the humaneness of capital punishment and the methods used to carry it out. In the days since the botched execution attempt, some have even talked about Pike as though she is a victim. Her mistreatment at the hands of the state and of the men who abused her when she was a child has featured prominently in that debate. These matters have, however, been considered and reconsidered by the justice system already. There are strong arguments on both sides of the death penalty debate. There is no argument for having a death penalty that cannot be imposed for decades, or competently. |