The headline Politico ran on Adam Hamawy’s primary win read “Adam Hamawy, medical doctor Army vet with controversial past, wins nomination to succeed Watson Coleman in New Jersey.” The controversial past, as the article eventually clarifies, is that in 1995, when Hamawy was a medical student in his twenties, he accompanied a Muslim cleric to a conference in Michigan and later translated a document for a press conference. This was thirty-one years ago. In the intervening decades, Hamawy served in the Army National Guard, worked as a first responder at the World Trade Center on September 11, saved Tammy Duckworth’s life when her Blackhawk helicopter was shot down in Iraq in 2004, and volunteered at a Gaza hospital during the genocide. Duckworth has said publicly that she would not be alive without him. None of that is in the headline. What is in the headline is the word “controversial”, doing the work it has always done when applied to Muslim men in American public life, which is to ensure that a Muslim man who serves this country at its worst moments and then speaks for Palestinian lives remains a threat to be managed rather than a man to be celebrated, because that particular combination has always been the one the political press cannot accommodate.

This is not separate from the argument about what is happening inside the Democratic Party. The same party that cannot bring itself to mention Gaza in a 192-page autopsy of why it lost in 2024, the party whose establishment press ran a headline about a Muslim doctor-veteran through the lens of a thirty-year-old conference attendance, is the same party whose base just elected Hamawy, elected Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York City, is poised to send Brad Lander to Congress over Dan Goldman by thirty-four points, and is watching a new wave of candidates, Chevalier in New York, Valdez in Brooklyn, El-Sayed in Michigan, Rabb in Pennsylvania, run on Medicare for All, abolition of ICE, and a full arms embargo on Israel and win. The base has moved. The institutions are still writing the same headlines.

 

The DNC autopsy makes the institutional failure legible in its most embarrassing form. A postelection survey found that twenty-nine percent of Americans who voted for Biden in 2020 and did not vote for Harris in 2024 cited ending Israel’s violence in Gaza as their reason, a number that surpassed the economy, immigration, healthcare, and abortion. Five hundred thousand people voted uncommitted in primaries before the convention to send a message the party chose not to receive. Six million fewer people voted for Harris than voted for Biden in 2020. And the DNC produced 192 pages without a single mention of Gaza, because to mention it would be to admit that the people who decided the election were not confused, were not apathetic, were not distracted by Republican messaging, but were people who looked at what their party was funding and decided they could not vote for it, and the party’s response to that decision was to produce 192 pages pretending it had never been made.

 

Ro Khanna spent the 2024 campaign trying to get Harris and the party to focus on the plight of Palestinians and losing that argument at every turn, and after the autopsy dropped he put the conclusion in a single sentence, that one of the reasons the party lost was its blank check to Netanyahu while they committed genocide in Gaza, and that the party must confront hard truths if it wants to win in 2028. The party’s response was to publish the autopsy anyway, Gaza-free, and move on. Meanwhile Andy Ogles posted that Muslims don’t belong in American society, posted that homosexuality has no place in America, blamed his staff, said he only found out when his phone started ringing, and remains in Congress, on the same committees, part of the same institution whose leadership calls him names and does nothing else. A Muslim Army veteran’s thirty-year-old conference attendance is a headline. A sitting congressman declaring that an entire religion has no place in this country is a one-day story.

What Hamawy’s win tells us, and what Mamdani’s win told us last year, is that the politics have shifted faster than the institutions can follow. The Overton window has moved so far and so fast that the new progressive position is not cutting aid, not cutting offensive weapons, but a full arms embargo including weapons sales, because Israel has the money to buy the weapons and everyone knows it and the arms sales are a subsidy to the US defense industry regardless, and the candidates who understand this are winning.

None of this is separate from what is happening in Gaza. It has never been separate. The surveillance technology being used on immigrants in this country was built on contracts with Israeli agencies that spent decades perfecting population control in the West Bank. The administrative detention holding people without charge in ICE facilities is the West Bank military court system translated into American English. The rhetoric that makes Hamawy’s headline possible, the Muslim man as permanent suspect, the cleric as contamination, the association as disqualifying no matter what comes after, is the same rhetoric that made the genocide possible, that made it easy for politicians to say Muslims don’t belong and get a one-day story, that made it possible for a defense minister to announce voluntary emigration and have the Western press treat it as a policy proposal. The violence does not stay where it is sent. It comes back. The people who have been watching it come back are the ones electing Hamawy and Mamdani and Chevalier and demanding that the party account for what it funded with their votes and their taxes.

The party will either learn this or it will not. The base already knows it. A Muslim Army veteran who saved a senator’s life and volunteered in a bombed hospital during a genocide won a congressional primary this week in New Jersey. The headline called him controversial. The voters called him their congressman.

Share