| ◼ Maybe the UFC should be in charge of the White House press room too.
◼ Reports indicate that the U.S. and Iran have reached a tentative deal to trade our blockade of Iran for a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, with a continuation of the cease-fire for 60 days to allow more time for nuclear negotiations. Aware of discontent among his pro-war supporters, President Donald Trump has said he is in no rush to sign anything. But even in the worst case, Iran is going to end up in a reduced position from October 6, 2023. Its economy was already in crisis before the war. Now, its proxies have been devastated; much of its nuclear infrastructure has been wrecked; and its industrial plants have been hit hard. Whatever sanctions relief or revenue from the strait that it gets will be poured into rebuilding. The regime has to assume it can wait Trump out, hoping that anti-war Democrats win in 2026 and that any presidential successor in 2028 won’t be willing to risk open conflict once again. If the deal is unsatisfactory, it won’t be because the president’s negotiating skills are lacking but because we weren’t able or willing to set the military conditions for successful diplomacy, most importantly by reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
◼ Trump was targeted in another assassination attempt. On May 24, a man approached a security checkpoint outside the White House and opened fire. Secret Service agents returned fire and killed the shooter, and a bystander was also shot. The would-be assassin, 21-year-old Nasire Best, has previously attempted to access the White House and identified himself to Secret Service agents as Jesus Christ. It is frustrating but unsurprising that past attempts on the president’s life have inspired copycats. But this latest incident received such fleeting media coverage over the holiday weekend that there was barely any time for the now-routine calls to lower the temperature of America’s political rhetoric. Those calls will be ignored as long as our political culture and social media algorithms continue to reward the most extreme voices.
◼ It was a bad primary runoff day for conservatives in Texas. Senator John Cornyn was defeated in his Senate primary and Representative Chip Roy lost his bid for state attorney general. Both have faced challenges in navigating the Trump era, and we have had our differences with them. But Cornyn’s defeat is especially depressing because Republicans have instead chosen to nominate Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose career has been defined by financial and sexual scandals, election conspiracy theories, and bad judgment. Paxton puts a safe Senate seat at risk against Democratic nominee James Talarico, and even if elected, he seems unlikely to be an effective or honorable legislator.
◼ Pope Leo XIV telegraphed his intention to write an encyclical about artificial intelligence upon his election. This has made Magnifica Humanitas perhaps the most widely anticipated church document since at least the Second Vatican Council. At 42,000 words, Magnifica Humanitas is an especially lengthy document for the church. It warns against “equating this type of ‘intelligence’ with that of human beings.” But it acknowledges that technology is a glorious part of humanity’s God-given capacity for creation and invention, and it rejects the Luddite view that tech is “antagonistic to humanity.” What gives this document weight and ties it back to Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum is the church’s insistence that no new system or technology can justify reducing human beings, made in God’s image, into mere cogs of a larger machine. Humans are ends in themselves, and their proper end is defined by a God who “casts down the mighty from their thrones, and has lifted up the lowly.”
◼ Trump scrapped a planned executive order that would have established federal oversight of new AI models. Promoted by AI skeptics in the administration, the order would have encouraged developers to submit their models to national-security agencies before public release. Officials would assess capabilities that bad actors could use to inflict devastating cyberattacks on digital infrastructure. The order’s intent was reasonable enough. As AI tools become ever more advanced, their risk to traditional cybersecurity systems grows. Yet Trump is right to be wary of any bureaucratic framework that might hamper AI development. Although the review system would be voluntary, it is designed to slow the introduction of new models. China is imposing no such limitations, and America’s narrow lead in the AI race is measured in months, not years. The threat from rogue AI users is real, but the risk of allowing our chief adversary to pull ahead and define the technology’s frontier is greater. Any effort to regulate AI should be carefully calibrated to protect cutting-edge innovation (and, ideally, be formulated by Congress). With the stakes so high, America cannot afford to get in its own way. |