| ◼ The JFK files confirm: It wasn’t us. We promise.
◼ Claiming authority to deport without judicial review Venezuelans tied to the vicious Tren de Aragua (TdA) international criminal syndicate, President Trump had approximately 250 aliens, most of them in custody on immigration and criminal charges, flown out of the U.S. Now El Salvador is holding them in a “mega-prison” designed for gangs and terrorists. Trump has cited the 1798 Alien Enemy Act, which generally applies only to aliens from a nation against whom the U.S. is in a “declared war.” It has been invoked three times, and never since the Second World War. After the ACLU filed an emergency habeas corpus petition, Chief Judge James Boasberg of the Washington, D.C., federal district court intervened, instructing the administration not to deport any alleged TdA members for 14 days and to turn around any deportation flights that were already in the air. Two flights had taken off before Boasberg’s order, and another departed a few minutes later. Prosecutors did not give the judge straight answers about the state of play, and the administration did not turn the flights around. After they landed, El Salvador’s president mocked the judge’s order (“Oops . . . Too late”) in a social-media post. The judge is now demanding an explanation under oath, the Department of Justice is stonewalling (under the cover of accusing Boasberg of usurping the president’s foreign-relations powers), and the mess appears headed to the Supreme Court—whose chief justice, John Roberts, reprimanded Trump for labeling Boasberg a “Radical Left Lunatic” who should be impeached. Trump has proven that he could gain control of the southern border on his own; he has not proven that it is wise, or permissible, to govern in contempt of the other branches.
◼ There’s a difference between holding wrongdoers accountable and wreaking vengeance. Trump’s executive order against Democratic law firm Perkins Coie crosses that line. Trump’s “retribution” campaign responds to real abuses. Two Perkins Coie lawyers, Marc Elias and Michael Sussmann, were behind the bogus Steele dossier that was used to gin up the yearslong investigation into Trump’s alleged ties to Russia. Sussman was indicted by John Durham for deceiving the FBI about who he was working for (the Clinton campaign) to generate surveillance of the Trump campaign, but a jury acquitted him. The Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid over $100,000 in fines to the Federal Election Commission for falsely categorizing the Steele opposition research as “legal services” paid to Perkins Coie—a deception similar to what Trump was convicted of doing in using Michael Cohen to disguise payoffs to Stormy Daniels as legal fees. All of this, however, was eight years ago; Elias and Sussman have long since left the firm. Trump complains of Perkins Coie’s efforts to “judicially overturn popular, necessary, and democratically enacted election laws,” but that’s part of what lawyers do. A presidential order subjecting the entire firm to sanctions such as investigations, contract debarment, and withdrawal of security clearances is disproportionate and unjust. Vengeance is a dish best served without abuse of power.
◼ Tuesday, Trump and Russian dictator Vladimir Putin had a much-touted phone call about a proposed cease-fire in Ukraine. According to the Russian readout of the call, “Trump put forward a proposal for the parties to the conflict to mutually refrain from attacks on energy infrastructure facilities for 30 days,” and “Vladimir Putin responded positively to this initiative and immediately gave the Russian military the corresponding order.” A few hours later, Trump jumped onto Truth Social to boast: “My phone conversation today with President Putin of Russia was a very good and productive one. We agreed to an immediate Ceasefire on all Energy and Infrastructure, with an understanding that we will be working quickly to have a Complete Ceasefire and, ultimately, an END to this very horrible War between Russia and Ukraine.” About an hour later, a Russian guided bomb knocked out the electrical power in half of the Ukrainian city of Slovyansk. Later that night, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky reported “a direct hit by a ‘Shahed’ drone on a hospital in Sumy, strikes on cities in the Donetsk region, and attack drones currently in the skies over the Kyiv, Zhytomyr, Sumy, Chernihiv, Poltava, Kharkiv, Kirovohrad, Dnipropetrovsk, and Cherkasy regions.” To the surprise of no one with even a passing familiarity with Putin, his promises mean nothing. He seems to be taking a perverse pleasure in making Trump look gullible and foolish. So far, Trump is cooperating.
◼ An executive order dramatically curtailed the functions of the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees long-standing “radios”: the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Martí, Radio Free Asia, and others. These services are lifelines to many under dictatorship. But defects within the agency—lapses in vetting foreign employees, mismanagement of resources, and the promotion of anti-American narratives—have counteracted its important work. Legal challenges to Trump’s actions have already emerged, as have substantive defenses of USAGM. In the abstract, the case for piecemeal reform over dramatic action may seem persuasive. But the latter course has already been tried, and has failed. There’s a stronger case for starting fresh, reconstituting specific parts of the agency that function well, with the ultimate goal of reinvigorating American public diplomacy.
◼ On Fox News early this week, Trump casually endorsed Canada’s acting prime minister, Mark Carney, the leader of the Liberal Party who took over after Justin Trudeau’s resignation in failure. Until a few months ago the Canadian Conservative Party looked poised to win a historic majority after years of Liberal misrule. That polling advantage disappeared once Trump took to jacking up tariffs on the country and threatening to annex it as the 51st state. Now the Liberals may narrowly cling to power. Is the endorsement a crude attempt at political reverse psychology, with Trump belatedly concerned that he has thrown away a sure thing for Canadian conservatives? More likely, Trump first forced the Conservative candidate, Pierre Poilievre, to criticize him, and then decided that he dislikes people who criticize him. But we hope the reverse psychology works, even if unintended. |