| ◼ Some senior Democrats—John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, and Tim Walz—have been taking aim at free speech. Kerry complains that the First Amendment is “a major block” to action on climate change. Walz stands by earlier comments that it doesn’t apply to “hate speech” and “misinformation.” Clinton attacks Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the provision that, by giving social-media companies a significant degree of legal immunity for user content, has enabled X and other platforms to widen the public square in ways that progressives would rather not see. The comments by Kerry, Clinton, and Walz are striking for their timing (did a memo go out?) and for a bluntness that once would have been better camouflaged. Banning “misinformation” is an attempt to shut down debate over truth. Muting X is the 21st-century equivalent of smashing a printing press. Neither should be possible in a republic where the First Amendment still matters.
◼ When celebrated author-activist Ta-Nehisi Coates sat down with the hosts of CBS Mornings on September 30, he was expecting a sympathetic interview allowing him to present The Message, his new book likening Israel to the Jim Crow South and declaring its existence in any form to be morally illegitimate. Instead he received serious questioning from host Tony Dokoupil, leading to a tense but informative interview. One might have expected Dokoupil to be congratulated for asking tough questions of an author making extraordinary and one-sided (when not flatly ahistorical) claims. Instead, his network has chosen to humiliate him. After an outcry both internally and on social media, Dokoupil was formally reprimanded by CBS for “not meeting editorial standards,” made to apologize during an all-hands staff meeting, and ordered to attend sensitivity training given by the network’s own internal (and ominously named) “Race & Culture Unit.” Additional commentary on this massive public disgrace feels superfluous, but it should not surprise anyone that—four years after the supposed peak of woke mania—a journalist can be professionally canceled for merely asking serious questions of a man pre-designated as a cultural saint.
◼ Proposition O, a referendum on the ballot in San Francisco, would affirm that in “policy and law” the city will “support, protect, and expand reproductive rights and services.” Provisions of the measure include authorization for the city to post, outside pro-life pregnancy centers, signage indicating that they don’t perform abortions or offer abortifacients. It would refer prospective clients to facilities that do—in effect, advertising abortion facilities, which would not be required to bear equivalent signage referring their prospective clients to the city’s two pro-life pregnancy centers. Once again, the “pro-choice” side isn’t really about choice.
◼ The Centers for Disease Control released a new survey with some shocking data: In 2023, 3.3 percent of U.S. high-school students identified as transgender, and 2.2 percent identified as “questioning.” This isn’t normal. According to a 2022 survey from UCLA, only 0.5 percent of U.S. adults identified as transgender. In other words, the percentage of children who identify as transgender in U.S. high schools is five times the percentage of American adults who identify as such. Tragically—and unsurprisingly—69 percent of questioning students and 72 percent of transgender students “experienced persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness.” Approximately 26 percent of transgender and questioning students attempted suicide in the past year. The CDC concluded that “more effort is necessary to ensure that the health and well-being of youths who are socially marginalized is prioritized.” Might anyone suggest to the CDC that gender confusion itself isn’t healthy for kids?
◼ The Appalachian Trail, a hiking route that stretches from Maine to Georgia, is more than 2,000 miles long. Millions visit some portion of it each year. Among them are a few thousand who try to traverse its multifaceted entirety. Only about a quarter succeed. In 2017, Tara Dower joined the unsuccessful three-fourths when she suffered a panic attack mid attempt. In the years since, however, Dower became a successful ultramarathoner. Still stung by her prior failure, she set a goal that only fellow lunatics in the distance-running community could even begin to comprehend: not just to return to the trail for a second attempt but to break the record for completing it in the least time. She set out on a support-team-assisted journey of sometimes up to 60 miles a day, subsisting on Goldfish and gummies while moving and taking in larger meals at night, and often camping below the stars. Hoping to beat Karel Sabbe, the previous record-holder, who, Dower admitted, was faster, she slept less (five hours a night was standard) and moved for more hours each day. On September 21, 40 days and 18 hours after she started, a weary but triumphant Dower reached the trail’s terminus ten hours before Sabbe had. Powered, occasionally through tears, by her “love” of the trail, Dower may now enjoy not just the exhausted satisfaction familiar to distance athletes but also the personal gratification of having triumphed over her past self. |