Contempt for immigrants is nothing new in this country. But it’s taken on a new form as Trump and Vance spread rumors about Springfield, Ohio’s Haitian community. And while none of us can control what comes out of Republicans’ mouths, John Nichols writes this week that “Kamala Harris has a chance to break the fever of our latest demagogic moment.” Nichols suggests that she “should seize the opening to reframe the debate about immigration with a speech.” Harris can “offer a model of presidential leadership” that all Americans “can embrace as a call for sanity in a moment of political madness.”
In addition to the right’s lies about immigrants, the news media has been fixated on the second Trump assassination attempt. Or should we even call it that? As Joan Walsh notes, it’s not the former president’s fault that someone tried to shoot him, but “he’s made it more difficult for Secret Service and other law enforcement officials to protect him,” by flouting rules and the suggestions they’ve given him for safer conduct.
Meanwhile, Chris Lehmann looks at the would-be assassin himself, Ryan Wesley Routh, who he describes as a man with “wild-swinging political sympathies.” Routh voted for Trump in 2016, was enamored of Tulsi Gabbard in 2020, and “entertained fond reveries of a Nikki Haley–Vivek Ramaswamy ticket” in 2024. Any finger-pointing from the left or right toward the other direction “misses a good deal of the larger point,” Lehmann insists. Routh’s politics might not make sense, but “the fantasies of assassins mostly hinge on the craving to lurch from fringe obscurity to the center stage of world-shaping historical agency.” Routh, as America tends to at large, envisioned “an outsize image of the role he was destined to play in world affairs.”
The gunman never had him in his line of sight nor fired a shot. Trump ignored Secret Service warnings about security at his golf course. Yet he’s blaming Democrats and raising money.
Harris has emphasized housing during her campaign more than most Democrats in recent years—but her policies rarely include the words “renters” or “tenants.”