By Cake Boy

I think it’s funny that the FBI staff who follow this site actually read these articles and maybe learn something from it.

Personally, I don’t really ‘attack’ the system. On the other hand, they see everything as ‘an attack’ these days. Not taking the vaccine, was ‘an attack’, having opinions that are not neoliberal or woke, is ‘an attack’ and ‘radical’. Often I just don’t say anything because I don’t want any debate with people. It ruins my day.

Speaking of “attacks,” last time, we talked about bottom unity and the land issue and how both libertarian anarchists and socialist anarchists have different ideas of what land is and should be.

There is another topic, where libertarian anarchists, mutualists, and social anarchists (the three main theories) differ. Libertarian anarchists and mutualists are not into social revolution. Socialist anarchists say they are.I once talked to some socialist anarchist, Antifa kind of guy, and he said he wanted ‘a revolution’. I think all of this is LARP, life-action role-playing. The socialist anarchist movement here has a hundred members, and they talk about their gender identity and the harms of fatphobia. They are not going to ‘overthrow’ the government in this country.

So, when we talk about this bottom unity, how can you connect mutualists, libertarians, and socialist anarchists when mutualists and anarcho-capitalists are more or less against violence, while the social anarchists say they want ‘the revolution’?

Will this pan-secession anarchist movement be revolutionary? I talked about a world that would be anarchist, a world where there are commons, open fields, and different social models that people can freely choose to live in. The neoliberal and communist states will never allow a world or space like that to exist. So, how do we deal with that reality?

Maybe a world like that could arise on the ruins of the old systems of power, like how, after the Roman Empire, new decentralized social systems arose.

These are questions you have to be very clear about. What is your position towards revolution?

How do we get to this futurist world Cake Boy talked about? What tactics do you use? Or is it just an ideal you want to spread to the people? Will you get there gradually or immediately?

I see communism rising again, so the anarchists will also have to organize to come up with a better alternative to communism. Communism might take over the silly American system when it’s collapsing. In a period like that, the anarchist forces might also play a role in shaping new geopolitical orders—at least if the anarchist movement is again serious by that time of social unrest. A severe modern/up-to-date movement would be a pan-secessionist movement, not an identity movement, as I talked about.

Every time anarchism became important, it was in the context of a big political conflict: the Russian Revolution, the Spanish War, and the war in Syria. Periods of conflict are like contrast fluid. In a period of conflict, people will pick a side, and people will discover what their actual political affiliations are

I am done with politics for several reasons. But I like to think with the anarchists about these issues. I was taught to think with people, and I’m always bored, so this is what I do.

When there is a new pan-anarchist movement, as I wrote about it, you can call it cake boy anarchism CB(A). It would stroke my ego if something like that existed.