| ◼ ABC should really report an in-kind contribution to the Harris campaign. Trump, too.
◼ Donald Trump didn’t have a great debate against Joe Biden, but it didn’t matter. He had a poor debate against Kamala Harris; will it matter? Trump’s lack of self-control was on full display as he took all bait offered, from letting Harris get his goat with taunts about people leaving his rallies to digging his heels in excusing January 6 rioters. But then, few minds were likely to be changed about Trump. While Trump may regret failing to define her, Harris did herself no favors by failing entirely to separate herself from Biden’s record even when both Trump and the moderators pressed her to do so. For their part, ABC’s moderators, David Muir and Linsey Davis, further discredited the notion that the networks can be trusted to be evenhanded. Muir and Davis repeatedly fact-checked Trump—even, sometimes, when he was right—while never doing so to Harris. It is not clear whether there will be another debate. Given the late entry of Harris into the race, voters deserve one, however unpleasant it would be to watch.
◼ While attempting to defend the Biden-Harris Afghanistan withdrawal disaster, Harris told the American people that “as of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world, the first time this century.” It’s possible that no one has told the vice president that American naval forces are fighting an intense, ongoing shooting war against the Iranian-backed Houthis in the Red Sea, and have been for almost a year; that Iranian-backed militants killed three American soldiers this January in Jordan; that Americans coordinated a huge operation to shoot down hundreds of Iranian rockets and drones targeting Israel in April; and that hundreds of Americans are deployed to Syria and Iraq fighting ISIS and other Islamist groups. What’s more likely is that Harris doesn’t think that Americans will be much bothered by her intentional obfuscation on matters of war and peace in pursuit of a debating point.
◼ “They’re eating the dogs, the people that came in, they’re eating the cats, they’re eating the pets of the people that live there.” This remarkable and crazy-sounding accusation made by Trump at the debate thrust a story percolating online about the travails of the town of Springfield, Ohio, into the national media spotlight. Trump went way beyond any verified facts, but it’s true that over the last few years of the Biden administration, nearly 20,000 immigrants from Haiti have moved to Springfield, a small town of 60,000, drawn there at first by the prospect of factory work and now by the presence of an enormous Haitian community. That’s a real issue, even if Trump is exploiting it with typical (and self-defeating) carelessness.
◼ Kamala Harris circulated a post with a girlhood memory—of visiting her grandparents in India. Laura Loomer commented above it. Loomer is a right-wing “influencer” who is part of Donald Trump’s entourage. She flew with him to the debate against Harris in Philadelphia. The next day, she flew with him to New York and Pennsylvania for 9/11 commemorations. The thing is: She has promoted the conspiracy theory that 9/11 was “an inside job.” Above Harris’s India post, Loomer wrote, “If Kamala Harris wins, the White House will smell like curry & White House speeches will be facilitated via a call center,” etc. Conservatives are accustomed to false accusations of racism, bigotry, and kookery. That does not mean that all such accusations are false.
◼ J. D. Vance is in a tricky spot. His current role as the GOP vice-presidential nominee came conditional on his willingness to go along with the lie about the 2020 election. But he knows the vice president had no power to change its results on January 6, 2021. So he has been workshopping his position for three years. It still makes no sense. At a live event for the All-In Podcast, Vance said that Mike Pence wasn’t really asked to overturn the 2020 election (he really was, several times) and that, had he been vice president, he would have “asked the states to submit alternative slates of electors” so the country could have a “rational conversation” about the election. The vice president has no such power, and whatever would have followed an attempt to exercise such power would not have been rational. Vance said Pence doesn’t really oppose Trump because of January 6, and “if Donald Trump wanted to start a nuclear war with Russia, Mike Pence would be at the front of the line endorsing him right now.” Even the compromised position Vance has chosen to operate in does not require him to say that; perhaps it’s the tell of a guilty conscience. |