| To make sense of the deal, I turned to one of Business Insider’s media experts: Peter Kafka.
Talks of Paramount’s sale have been brewing for a while. What are your initial thoughts on Skydance being the one to seal the deal?
Well, it’s not sealed yet. This thing may still get derailed by a lawsuit from cranky investors. But if it does go through: It’s the least-bad version for Hollywood, since owner-to-be David Ellison wants to keep Paramount making movies and TV shows, and that isn’t a foregone conclusion with any other buyer.
Paramount has fallen pretty far behind its peers in streaming. What is its biggest pain point that Skydance will look to address?
Paramount loses money on streaming, like many of its peers. That’s fixable. It has a subscale audience, and I don’t know how a new owner fixes that.
The deal means one of the richest people in the world is tangentially connected to Paramount. How could that play a factor?
As I’ve written, the most important thing about David Ellison being Larry Ellison’s son is that his dad is helping to finance the deal (what a dad!). But suggestions that Larry Ellison’s tech background will help his son run a Hollywood studio make no sense.
As for other streamers, are any happy, or upset, by the outcome of this deal?
The most important question for Paramount isn’t “who owns Paramount?” It’s “is Paramount big enough to survive on its own?” And that question remains unanswered and unchanged by this deal. |