Culture Wars/Current Controversies

It’s Not a “National Divorce.” It’s a Call for One-Party Authoritarian Rule.

By Matt Ford, The New Republic

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s idea for America to “separate by red states and blue states” isn’t just dumb and harmless. It’s also a window into a dangerous vision that’s ascendent in the Republican Party.

Marjorie Taylor Greene gives President Biden a thumbs-down
Win McNamee/Getty Images
Marjorie Taylor Greene gave President Biden a thumbs-down at the State of the Union earlier this month.

This is a difficult moment for the American republic. More than a million Americans died in the Covid-19 pandemic. Former President Trump’s supporters stormed the Capitol two years ago in a violent and deadly coup attempt; he himself may soon face charges for trying to subvert the election that he lost in 2020. Our political divides seem more intractable now than at any other time in living memory.

In this grim hour, the nation naturally turns to one of its leading political thinkers: Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. Her proposed solution is simple. “We need a national divorce,” she wrote on Twitter on February 20. “We need to separate by red states and blue states and shrink the federal government. Everyone I talk to says this. From the sick and disgusting woke culture issues shoved down our throats to the [Democrats’] traitorous America Last policies, we are done.”

Greene’s call, however, is not a cure for the disease in our body politic but a symptom of it. Every call for the United States to break apart or divide itself based on the political factions of the moment are built on a fantasy. In that fantasy, the proponents get to live in a world where everything they want comes true, and the perceived opponents finally get the self-inflicted comeuppance that they and their ideas deserve. Greene’s vision is not just about realizing conservative policy ideas—it is an authoritarian rejection of democratic government itself.

Greene is hardly the first person to call for a “national divorce.” (Five years ago, a contributor to this magazine regrettably called for a “Bluexit.”) The term is most often used as a sanitized version of secessionism, one that implies—without guaranteeing—a more peaceful outcome than the last attempt in 1860. In recent years, a vocal sect of conservative pundits has been “predicting” that another civil war is on the horizon because of the country’s deep political divides. I say “predicting” because some of these commentaries read less like urgent warnings to prevent a civil war and more like thinly veiled wish-casting for one to occur. After all, as these pundits boast from time to time, they’re the side with all the guns.

READ MORE

1 reply »

  1. First and foremost, I think MTG is a complete fucking imbecile! She is basically that drunk aunt that we all had as a kid that nobody wanted over for Christmas but was invited anyway just because she is family. Plus, she is calling for prayer in schools in red states. Does she assume that everyone on the right is Christian? What a cunt! However, I will have to agree with her that we need a national divorce. As for the author’s comment that a national divorce would lead to a one party rule. Um bro! We already have a one party rule. The 2 major American parties might have some different social issues but at the end of the day they both serve the same international elite, corporate/war machine. If anything a national divorce might lead to 3rd parties coming into power.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Attack the System

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading