Alexei Navalny is still teaching us something.

Andrew Sullivan

Feb 23, 2024

“Well, I now have a sheepskin coat, an ushanka hat (a fur hat with ear-covering flaps), and soon I will get valenki (a traditional Russian winter footwear). I have grown a beard for the 20 days of my transportation. … [The trip was] pretty exhausting, but I’m still in a good mood, as befits a Santa Claus,” – Alexei Navalny, tweeting from a prison above the Arctic Circle last December.

“But no one would ever dare accuse Stalin of having a sense of humor!” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Gulag Archipelago.

It is a rare and precious thing when a human being possesses both bravery and humor in copious amounts. But Alexei Navalny was a rare and precious human being. His sense of madcap fun complemented his adamantine courage, and gave it a kind of humility. There was no crisis — even his imminent imprisonment, solitary confinement, and likely death — that Navalny couldn’t leaven with a joke. The very day before his murder, he quipped in court, “Your Honor, I will send you my personal account number so that you can use your huge salary as a federal judge to ‘warm up’ my personal account, because I am running out of money.” Even the judge cracked a smile.

Navalny seemed not to fear Putin in the slightest, let alone respect him, but to see the short, pudgy, Botoxed apparatchik as a ridiculous, lying — and constantly scared — thief. His fundamental critique was that Putin was in it for the money, for his $1.3 billion palace, his dachas, his yachts, his casino, his whores. This indeed was how he mocked the entire Putin gang:

Some [of Navalny’s YouTube reports] used drone footage of Italian villas owned by Putin’s underlings. Others plucked evidence from photos that these officials or their relatives posted online, flaunting a yacht or luxury watches. One technocrat had a habit of flying his pet corgis to dog shows on a private jet. In his videos, Navalny delivered these findings in an irreverent style, like a wisecracking detective for the YouTube generation.

And he understood the diorama of deceit Putin needed to keep up appearances: “Our leaders lie about everything, big and small,” he once said in court. He went on:

Putin gave a speech yesterday in which he said “We don’t have palaces.” We’ve been taking photos of his palaces for ages — three a month! We publish them and we’re told “We don’t have palaces”! Why do you tolerate these lies? Why do you look the other way? I’m sorry if I’m dragging you into a philosophical discussion but life is too short to look the other way.

In his own case, he was of course brutally right. But even if he’d managed to survive for more than 47 years, it’s unlikely he would have been able to marshal mass support against Putin in the foreseeable future.

Navalny had a tough time breaking through the wall of government propaganda at the best of times; the nationalism Putin has captured with his imperialism has a deep and wide base of support in the country at large; the annexation of Crimea is hugely popular; the war to occupy all of Ukraine, despite the staggering losses, has broad support (though it may be flagging); and the Republican Party has given Putin an unexpected breathing space in his campaign to intimidate the democracies of Europe. These are not propitious times for opponents of tyrants.

Nonetheless, Navalny clearly rented vast amounts of space in Putin’s head. His very name never crossed the dictator’s lips. And you can see why. At 6’3”, the handsome, blond Russian patriot and heart-throb, with a beautiful wife he so abundantly loved, and their tangle of blond kids, is straight out of a Slavic Abercrombie & Fitch ad. Watch footage of the bald 5’7” Putin being questioned about Navalny and you’ll see him tense up, his lips purse, and his eyelids flutter ever-so-slightly. He saw him the way Trump sees Obama. And it clearly consumed him.

For a while, he tolerated Navalny’s provocations to avoid elevating him in the public eye. But in 2020, Putin finally ordered Navalny’s death by the chemical agent, Novichok, his signature method of assassination. Because of a diverted flight and emergency treatment in Germany, he survived to tell the story of his failed murder. Putin, of course, denied everything the day after Navalny detailed the plot, unraveled by the journalist Christo Grozev. But, unknown to Putin, Navalny had already managed to punk one of the identified murderers, by calling him cold and pretending to be a superior. The henchman had confirmed all of it. The tape of that phone call was then broadcast to the world the day after Putin’s denial, brutally exposing him as he had never been exposed before.

In the Oscar-winning CNN documentary, Navalny, you can watch Navalny call the man who tried to murder him on the phone, put on his apparatchik voice, and slowly get him to cough up crucial details confirming the plot. It’s a tour de force. As the man slowly revealed what had gone wrong with their scheme, Navalny, never breaking character, silently high-fived those around him, grinning ear-to-ear. And then, after he hung up, he actually expressed pity for the man, who would of course face death for his mistake.

And I thought to myself: Navalny had just endured a terrible poisoning that took months to recover from. Yet here he was able to stay calm when talking to one of his actual would-be assassins, and even feel empathy for him. And then, shortly thereafter, you watch him get on a plane and actually fly back to his homeland into the hands of the goons of that humiliated dictator. He was never free again. The last few years have seen such a dreary display of utter cowardice everywhere. Except here. In an impenetrable smog of opportunism, Navalny was a flashlight of principle.

Why did Putin choose to finish him off now? Who really knows? But it isn’t, I fear, a sign of weakness. The Russian military just scored a small victory in Ukraine, retaking Avdiivka; US military aid to Ukraine is stalled in the Congress; the Russian presidential “election” is coming up and Putin will triumph; the Russian economy has grown more than the US’s or Western Europe’s since the war began, its trade re-oriented toward the East, in an unholy alliance with China, North Korea, and Iran; Putin just got publicly fellated for two whole hours by Tucker Carlson, who never mentioned Navalny once; and the Munich Security Conference was taking place — which in 2007 was “Putin’s stage for declaring what would become his war against the West,” as Masha Gessen notes. The murder was a mob boss proving his power by ordering a whack.

And it seems to me to demand a response more potent than the round of sanctions Biden just introduced and Navalny often mocked. It demands that we break the logjam in the Congress and pass stand-alone military aid to Ukraine as fast and as aggressively as possible. Readers know I’ve been a skeptic about the Ukraine war, because it is not a vital US interest, and because the deep connections between Russia and Ukraine make this more complicated than the invasion of one self-evidently discrete country by another. Navalny himself thought Crimea belongs to Russia; he was the son of a Russian mother and a Ukrainian father, blending the two identities for much of his life. And it will not be possible to eject Russia from the East of Ukraine and Crimea, in the near or medium future.

But we can do our part to strengthen Ukraine’s position in the partition to come, without any pretensions for total victory. We can strengthen NATO, and continue to urge Europe to do more. The truth is: Europe has woken up to its own defense. They’ve displayed remarkable unity, and are finally our near-equals in support for Ukraine. If you want a less US-dependent NATO, as Senator Vance says he does, this is something you should reward, not punish.

Navalny’s death shows us something else as well. We lose something profound if we mark his assassination with supine acquiescence. Courage should beget courage. Navalny was a proud Russian nationalist, but he represented the core principles of the West; and they are worth prudently defending abroad as well as at home. In Navalny, you see a commitment to empirical truth over ideological lies; to transparency over corruption; to courage over brute force; to humor over power; and to freedom over tyranny. We may be chastened as a super-power, and we have every reason to be. But something deep is at stake here in the wake of Navalny’s murder. And we betray our souls if we let him die in vain.

New On The Dishcast: Jeffrey Rosen

Jeff is the president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, where he hosts “We the People,” a weekly podcast of constitutional debate. He is also a professor of law at the George Washington University Law School, and a contributing editor at The Atlantic. A former house-mate of mine and friend for 40 years, he began his journalistic career writing some stellar essays on the Supreme Court in the TNR when I was editor. The author of many books, his new one is The Pursuit of Happiness: How Classical Writers on Virtue Inspired the Lives of the Founders and Defined America. It’s a paean to the Stoics.

Listen to the episode here. There you can find two clips of our convo — on the transcendence of deep reading in the age of distraction, and the hypocrisy of many Founding Fathers on slavery. That link also takes you to commentary on our episodes with Nate Silver on gambling and Isikoff/Klaidman on Trump’s trials. We also hear from dissenters over my views on foreign policy, Ukraine, and Biden’s prospects for November, with my responses throughout. Plus, a new PSB mini-doc!

Money Quotes For The Week

“Every leader kills people. Some kill more than others. Leadership requires killing people. Sorry,” – Tucker Carlson a few days before Navalny’s death, asked why he didn’t ask Putin about him.

“When 99 of 120 Israeli lawmakers vote to reject the establishment of a Palestinian state through international mediation … we really need to stop pretending that the only problem in Israel is Netanyahu. That the rest of the Israeli establishment is moderate and amenable to peace. It is not. … Biden does not have a partner for peace in Israel,” – Trita Parsi.

“This is America, where racism is the #1 value our populace seeks to uphold above all,” – Jack Krawczyk, head of Google’s Gemini AI, in 2018. More on this next week.

“All of the major American medical associations have signed off on [sex changes for kids] and I have never seen those organizations sign off on anything with less information as to whether or not it does long-term harm of anything in my life,” – Dr. Phil McGraw.

“There’s no such thing as parental rights in Canada; there are parental responsibilities. In Canadian family law, the primary responsibility of parents is to support and affirm their kids,” – Randall Garrison, Canadian MP, on sex changes for kids.

“Education is a colonial structure that centres whiteness and Eurocentricity and therefore it must be actively decolonized,” – Toronto School Board on its “core beliefs.”

“[B]asically if you are in free society, a capitalist society, after two or three generations of hard work everyone becomes kind of decadent, lazy, spoiled — whatever. … Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad as you say with the white working class, don’t you want to get new Americans in?” – Bill Kristol, finally telling us what he really thinks of the Republican base he championed, conned, and baited for decades.

“29 cuts in 2 minutes. 29,” – Phil Kerpen on a Biden ad showing a single speech about Ukraine.

“At what point do we drop the illusion we are a Republic and accept that we have the same system as Iran and China?” – Scott Adams, Trump fan, now full-on bonkers.

“If, as claimed by humanism, man were born only to be happy, he would not be born to die. Since his body is doomed to death, his task on earth evidently must be more spiritual: not a total engrossment in everyday life, not the search for the best ways to obtain material goods and then their carefree consumption. It has to be the fulfillment of a permanent, earnest duty so that one’s life journey may become above all an experience of moral growth: to leave life a better human being than one started it,” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, in his 1978 Commencement Address at Harvard.

Yglesias Award Nominee

“I know a lot of liberals, a lot of Democrats are going to be furious at me for this show. But to say this is a media invention, that people are worried about Biden’s age because the media keeps telling them to be worried about Biden’s age? If you have really convinced yourself of that, in your heart of hearts, I almost don’t know what to tell you,” – Ezra Klein, calling for Biden to step aside for November.

Face Of The Week

Big week chez Sully. Above is a stray mutt recently found wandering alone, without a collar, in West Virginia. I became his lucky new owner, thanks to City Dogs Rescue. I’m calling him Truman, after Harry, not Capote. And he’s already giving ‘em hell.

Dissent Of The Week: Neoracism, Ctd

A reader writes:

Please learn something about the history of racism and its continuing economic exploitation before writing inconsiderate stuff like:

Now look at the difference between family structure among many Asian-American groups and that of black Americans. And how can one blame “white supremacy” for the constant murderous mayhem of urban black spaces? Only by removing from young black men any concept of their own agency and humanity.

Family structures are destroyed by poverty, drugs and the carceral state. I include the foster system as part of the carceral state. Some mothers or fathers may have felt the need to steal or sell drugs to feed their family (parents or siblings or children), and then they get sent to prison and the children grow up poor and fatherless, undernourished and uneducated. It’s a generational cycle — not easy for a third or fourth generation to pull him or herself up by bootstraps. To do that, you need boots!

Despite many (but relatively few) successes in government and business, most blacks are still subject to outrageous disadvantages due to racism. Recall that the FBI found that Ferguson, MO was targeting blacks for tickets of all sorts and found it was to such an egregious and systemic degree that it was a civil rights violation. So many times I have been stopped and just sent happily on my way by friendly cops. If I were black, I might be in debt a few more thousand dollars. The Ferguson “black tax” prevented them from funding cars to get to jobs, schooling, or just food and clothing.

Then recall that blacks lost the greatest percentage of their wealth in the Too Big To Fail rip-off of 2008, and so today are the most insecure in housing. Notice the cycle? Now these poor homeless children are most likely to turn to drugs or crime or be abused and abandoned in the foster system, and so the cycle repeats. Not a glitch: a feature to keep the black minority down.

Don’t forget the Drug Pandemic, where the black inner cities were targeted by the Iran contra CIA importation of heroin and crack — whereby blacks got much longer sentences than white folk snorting coke — not to mention losing lives and minds and families even without prison. Indeed, some finally learn to read when sober inside.

Yes, ultimately people have to free themselves, but cavalier insults such as yours are not the way to facilitate change.

Truth: the black family was much stronger when societal oppression was far worse, and black poverty far deeper. Family structures can be pressured by many things — poverty, crime, and addiction among them. But they are destroyed by members of families reneging on their core responsibilities as fathers and husbands. I don’t see why we should expect less from one segment of society — and that increasingly includes the white working class as well.

As always, keep the dissents coming: dish@andrewsullivan.com.

Mental Health Break

A mashup artist blended three animations for a Pink Floyd song:

In The ‘Stacks

• After the fall of Avdiivka, “Zelensky’s regime is tottering,” says Stephen Bryen.
• A look back at the “epic battle” that saved Ukraine from a swift defeat at the war’s onset.
• It’s hard to imagine a greater contrast than Navalny and Trump.
• Brian Beutler on the clusterfuck of the GOP’s impeachment case against Biden over his son’s dealings.
• How has the Hermit Kingdom endured for so long?
• Why is Pakistan “one of the world’s biggest economic basket cases,” and how can they change?
• Filipovic covers the “shocking and jarring decision” in Alabama over IVF.
• Milli Hill takes on the BBC over trans “breastmilk”. Jesus. How insane can they get?
• A woman who volunteered for 60 years at an MS charity is sacked over pronouns. The charity has now issued an apology to her.
• Neoracism watch: “Feather Alerts” are Amber Alerts for Native Americans.
• A comedy writer strains to make fun of Gemini because its output is too damn funny on its own. Mike Solana delves into the dangers of woke AI.
• Dems have destroyed their long-time lead on education.
• A teacher contends with snow days going remote after Covid.
• Climate change, namely drought, is threatening hydropower in the PNW.
• Freya India is gobsmacked by the peer pressure to broadcast mental health over social media. She also asks, “Are you asexual or on antidepressants?”
• Ever thought of homesteading?
• Jesse Singal challenges the “conspiracy entrepreneur” Bret Weinstein.
• The debate between Balko and Hughes continues over George Floyd.
• Susan Orlean starts a ‘stack.

The View From Your Window Contest

Where do you think? Email your entry to contest@andrewsullivan.com. Please put the location — city and/or state first, then country — in the subject line. Bonus points for fun facts and stories. Proximity counts. The deadline for entries is Wednesday night at midnight (PST). The winner gets the choice of a View From Your Window book or two annual Dish subscriptions.

See you next Friday.

Subscribe Here