| ◼ If the deep state can get Taylor Swift hitched, maybe it really is all-powerful.
◼ The NFL’s Kansas City Chiefs—currently in the news for being Super Bowl–bound as well as for the fact that tight end Travis Kelce is dating musician Taylor Swift—are apparently participating in the most sinister conspiracy ever foisted upon an unwitting American public, if you believe social media’s least reputable yet highest-profile Trump-affiliated “influencers.” Many of them, including former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, now pursuing his natural calling, argue in all purported sincerity that Taylor Swift is an “op.” Her success, apparently, is the product not of savvy branding and decades of work but rather of a series of shady agreements between her, the NFL, and George Soros to achieve peak crossover appeal right before she endorses Joe Biden in 2024. Needless to say, the argument is absurd and reflects the combination of lunacy and cynicism of those promoting it. The response it has received among the grassroots, however—and, reportedly, among Trump’s staff—also reflects something much more consequential: Trumpworld’s well-founded anxiety that his unpopularity with young and even middle-aged women may be irreparable.
◼ A Manhattan federal jury walloped Trump with an $83.3 million damages award for journalist E. Jean Carroll in the second civil trial arising out of her claims that he sexually assaulted her in the mid Nineties and then defamed her in denying it. The verdict, though not its staggering amount, was inevitable. Trump failed to testify or even show up at the first trial last spring. Because the case is civil, not criminal, the first jury was told it could draw a negative inference against him. He was found liable even though Carroll could not fix an exact year when the assault allegedly happened, and no supporting forensic evidence was admitted. Judge Lewis Kaplan, a Clinton appointee, ruled prior to the second trial that Trump could not contest the first jury’s findings of sexual assault and defamation. Hence, even though Trump deigned to show up and briefly testify in the second trial—involving two remaining defamation claims—he could not truly defend himself. The verdict appears excessive, given that in the first case, where sexual assault was at issue, the jury awarded Carroll just $5 million. Trump will have to post the entire $83.3 million, plus interest, to appeal.
◼ Fulton County, Ga., district attorney Fani Willis dodged a bullet: Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor she hired to indict Donald Trump and 18 others on RICO charges, and with whom she was allegedly having an affair, settled his divorce case. She therefore need not testify about whether they used the fees she paid him to take luxury vacations. But there are other bullets coming. The judge in the RICO case has ordered that she respond by today, February 2, to defense motions that she and Wade be disqualified and the case dismissed. She is under investigation by the Georgia legislature and the House Judiciary Committee, both controlled by Republicans. And a new toxic allegation has emerged: A whistleblower claims Willis fired her and had her escorted out of the DA’s office by armed guards after she complained about misuse of funds by a close Willis adviser. Willis has defiantly asserted that she will not withdraw from the Trump case or resign from office. This prosecution has often been described as “sprawling,” and now so are its scandals.
◼ The House Homeland Security Committee, on a party-line vote, approved two articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. This is a salutary step. Only one cabinet secretary has ever been impeached, in 1876, and he resigned before the Senate could remove him. Mayorkas has been the willing implement for this administration’s blatant refusal to enforce federal immigration law. He has ignored federal statutes requiring that illegal immigrants be detained until they are removed, given asylum, or otherwise legally adjudicated. He has twisted the definitions of legal status, incoherently extended protected status to 700,000 Venezuelan migrants, and handed out meaningless court dates, sometimes a decade in the future, as a substitute for enforcement today. He stands charged with “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” in disregard of seven different enumerated statutory requirements and with a “breach of the public trust” for false statements to Congress and obstruction of congressional oversight. House Republicans, with few other levers to compel executive compliance with the law, should vote to impeach, even if the Democratic Senate will not convict.
◼ Donald Trump on the campaign trail seems increasingly content to make a massive tax increase a major part of his domestic agenda. His proposal for a 10 percent tariff on all imports (which would not be on all imports, as exceptions would inevitably be doled out according to lobbying and political preference) would cost Americans about $300 billion per year, according to an estimate from the Tax Foundation. Notwithstanding recent comments to the contrary by Trump adviser Stephen Miller, tariffs are taxes on Americans. Perhaps more damaging than the tax increase itself would be the harm it would do to U.S. relationships with other countries. This ought to be a time when the U.S. is forging closer commercial ties with countries other than China instead of trying to freeze them out of the U.S. market. Retaliation from other countries would be swift, and U.S. exporters would be harmed by their trade restrictions in response to Trump’s. One of Trump’s campaign arguments is that the economy was better, and stuff was cheaper, when he was president. In this case as in others, he seems determined to undermine himself. |