| The most eye-catching part of the bill is its expansion of the Child Tax Credit. The House bill also expands the “refundable” portion of the credit that very low-income families receive, meaning they’ll receive tax credits that exceed the value of their tax liability.
Republicans and Democrats have both supported child tax credits as a simple and direct means of cutting child poverty.
On the other hand, American Enterprise Institute scholars Scott Winship and Kevin Corinth have argued that the design of the tax credit will create work disincentives for low-income families, encouraging them to take part-time over full-time employment or even drop out of the labor force entirely.
“What is a refundable tax credit? It’s welfare by a different name. We’re going to give cash payments, checks, to people who don’t even pay taxes,” said Rep. Thomas Massie, (R–Ky.), per PBS. The Wall Street Journal editorial board called the child tax credit provisions a “trojan horse.”
On the flip side, some Progressive Democrats voted no on the bill because it didn’t expand the child tax credit enough.
The legislation allows businesses to immediately and fully deduct their development and research spending, interest costs, and capital depreciation from their tax bills. That’s earned it support from free market, low-tax groups like Americans for Tax Reform.
The bill also sunsets a pandemic-era employee retention tax credit that’s proven massively more expensive than expected and has been riddled with fraud.
Everyone is going to find something to like and dislike about the House bill. Perhaps the most important takeaway is that it continues America’s long tradition of doing literally all policy through the tax credits.
The bill now goes to the Senate, where it’s expected to have a tougher time passing.
California lawmakers are getting increasingly serious about reparations. On Wednesday, the California Legislative Black Caucus released 14 bills intended to right the wrongs of past racist policies.
The bills are wide-ranging. One would require advanced notice to be provided when grocery stores close in underserved communities. Another would restrict the use of solitary confinement. There’s also a bill that would provide state funding to “specific groups,” which Politico described as potentially unconstitutional.
Interestingly for property rights advocates, the bill would look to reverse past instances of “race-based” eminent domain. That bill would “restore property taken during raced-based uses of eminent domain to its original owners or provide another effective remedy where appropriate, such as restitution or compensation,” said California Sen. Steven Bradford (D–Inglewood), reported Cal Matters.
Notably missing from the package is any sort of cash payments to the descendants of slaves.
The Biden administration’s slow-burning war on gas stoves continues. Earlier this week, the U.S. Department of Energy released a final rule creating new, tougher energy efficiency standards for home appliances that affect both gas and electric stoves.
Earlier versions of this rule could have forced many gas stoves off the market entirely, complimenting local and state efforts to ban gas appliances in new development. The administration’s final rule is more modest. The Washington Post reports it will affect 3 percent of gas stoves on the market.
The Energy Department’s final rule “is less stringent than the initial proposal that would have forced most gas models off the market, there really shouldn’t be any such federal regulatory meddling in the decisions of consumers,” said Ben Lieberman of the Competitive Enterprise Institute. He cautioned that the Biden administration is still working on tougher regulatory standards for more home appliances like dishwashers, washing machines, ceiling fans, furnaces, and water heaters. |