The President is to be the commander-in-chief of the army and navy of the United States. In this respect his authority would be nominally the same with that of the king of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval force, as first General and admiral of the Confederacy; while that of the British king extends to the declaring of war and to the raising and regulating of fleets and armies,–all which, by the Constitution under consideration, would appertain to the legislature.
— Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 69 [March 14, 1788]
HORNBERGER’S BLOG
December 21, 2022
January 6 versus Columbine, Sandy Hook, and Uvalde
On April 20, 1999, 12th-grade students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold killed 12 students and one teacher at Columbine High School in Colorado. The weapons they used were a 9mm TEC-9 semi-automatic handgun and double-barreled shotguns. On December 14, 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut. He used an AR-15 rifle. On May …
Free Trade Is a Human Right
by Laurence M. Vance
Did the United States really give China $309 billion this year? Some conservatives think so. Now, it is certainly true, as conservatives regularly point out, …
Christmas and the Welfare-Warfare State
by Jacob G. Hornberger
Given that it’s Christmas time, let’s contemplate life without a transfer society or an interventionist foreign policy. Go …
When Will Congress Admit Its Mistakes?
by Laurence M. Vance
“I was wrong,” says a group of New York Times opinion writers. “Eight Times Opinion columnists revisit their incorrect predictions…