1 reply »

  1. I’ve noticed that the therapeutic state and shitlib respectability politics have made it some kind of refutation to diagnose your opponent as having a grievance, emotional response or motive, as though it couldn’t be the case that 1) Clarence Thomas was angry, perhaps in excess, 2) he was being honest and 3) is also correct. Attributing an ambition or psychological state to someone does not refute their position.

Leave a Reply