2 replies »

1. This is the left that will join us. I would classify the network of Indigenous activists from Alaska and Canada First Nations on down through Central American resistance fighters as leftist organizations. There’s heavy cross pollination and admiration that crosses the US/Mexico border and even the language barrier between these groups. And of course there’s the African groups and SE Asian resistance fighters to look to. We will steadily steal these demographics away from the mainstream left and even the radical left. Support from the radical left usually withers once start talking about racial separatism, nationalism, cultural conservatism, religion and exclusion; many of which are very important to indigenous communities (indigenous is apparently becoming the catch all phrase for dark skinned people from anywhere.) About the only common ground we have with American leftists is collectivism, which we’ve actually been successfully implementing for centuries along with those values that the American left has been trying to extinguish.

   Reply

2. What I find perhaps most interesting about this is that we now have a rising upper middle class, soon to be ruling class, that is committed to this left-totalitarian multicultural ideology. Meanwhile, we have the demographic transformation taking place and the ever increasing class polarization also taking place.

   What this means is that decades from now the totalitarian leftist ruling class will likely be threatened with an insurgency by the actual multi-cultures who will comprise substantial sectors of the lumpenproletarian, lower proletarian, or sinking middle classes.

   “Support from the radical left usually withers once start talking about racial separatism, nationalism, cultural conservatism, religion and exclusion; many of which are very important to indigenous communities (indigenous is apparently becoming the catch all phrase for dark skinned people from anywhere.) ”

   I’ve long predicted that is the issue that will actually split the Left’s present coalition. My “ten core demographics” theory is based on the premise that the major political fault line in the future of the U.S. will be one that pits the new ruling class of cosmopolitan urban professionals, businessmen, and bankers (the majority of whom will still be white), elite members of the minority groups, the state bureaucracy, and the standard liberal special interest groups against the ever growing classes of the increasingly impoverished , whose ranks will include marginalized poor and working class whites as well as the same socioeconomic layers among both the traditional American minorities and the new immigrant populations, many of whom will be second, third or fourth generation by then.

   I actually think the Left is right that class and socioeconomic conflict will be a bigger fault line that either race or religion. But what I think will change is there will be a major shift in the rhetoric of the Left on social and cultural matters. I suspect the affluent cosmopolitan liberal left will eventually start to attack the cultures of the minority and immigrant lower socioeconomic layers in the same manner that they now attack the culture of poor and working class whites. How does the liberal-left portray poor and working class white people? As basically ignorant, semi-literate, racist, superstitiously religious, homophobic, flag-waving yahoos. In the contemporary rhetoric of the liberal-left we get the impression they think that if only the white working class disappeared from society, then everything would be fine.

   But as the minority and immigrant populations grow and the class divisions create greater unrest, I think the liberal-left will turn that same anti-white working class rhetoric towards the minority cultures as well and in the same way. Poor blacks will be vilified as patriarchal, homophobic, religious, violent, criminal, gang-banging, anti-Hispanic racists. Poor Mexicans and Central Americans will be attacked as macho homophobic male chauvinists and Catholic reactionaries. Sudanese, Somali, Hmong, or Iraqi immigrants will be attacked as wife-beating, bride kidnapping, homophobic, Muslim theocrats. Eastern Europeans will be attacked as pimps and prostitutes.

   So our message of a “pan-tribal alliance among all enemies of the state” or however we want to frame it should find an audience among a lot of different demographics including those that otherwise have no use for each other.

   Reply