Support the Right to Discriminate 10

Ban the cops from Anarchist cafes! No coffee and donuts for you, PIG! This is a hilarious story. Next thing we know the police will be doing sit-ins in anarchist coffee shops. Maybe the Black Bloc can break out the dogs and firehoses.

“I have a dream that the day will come when all God’s children, pigs and anarcho-leftoids, can sit down together for a chocolate mocha….”

Right-Wing Anarchism Reply

[Keith: One of my correspondents sent me this…]

A translation of Karlheinz Weißman’s entry on “Anarchismus von rechts” (right-wing anarchism) in the Lexikon des Konservatismus (Graz and Stuttgart: Leopold Stocker Verlag, 1996) edited by Caspar von Schrenck-Notzing.

Right-wing Anarchism

The concept of right-wing anarchism seems paradoxical, indeed oxymoronic, starting from the assumption that all “right-wing” political viewpoints include a particularly high evaluation of the principle of order. . . . In fact right-wing anarchism occurs only in exceptional circumstances, when the hitherto veiled affinity between anarchism and conservatism may become apparent. Ernst Jünger has characterised this peculiar connection in his book Der Weltstaat (1960): “The anarchist in his purest form is he, whose memory goes back the farthest: to pre-historical, even pre-mythical times; and who believes, that man at that time fulfilled his true purpose . . . In this sense the anarchist is the Ur-conservative, who traces the health and the disease of society back to the root.” Jünger later called this kind of “Prussian” . . . or “conservative anarchist” the “Anarch,” and referred his own “désinvolture” as agreeing therewith: an extreme aloofness, which nourishes itself and risks itself in the borderline situations, but only stands in an observational relationship to the world, as all instances of true order are dissolving and an “organic construction” is not yet, or no longer, possible.

Even though Jünger himself was immediately influenced by the reading of Max Stirner, the affinity of such a thought-complex to dandyism is particularly clear. In the dandy, the culture of decadence at the end of the 19th century brought forth a character, which on the one hand was nihilistic and ennuyé, on the other hand offered the cult of the heroic and vitalism as an alternative to progressive ideals.

The refusal of current ethical hierarchies, the readiness to be “unfit, in the deepest sense of the word, to live” (Flaubert), reveal the dandy’s common points of reference with anarchism; his studied emotional cold, his pride, and his appreciation of fine tailoring and manners, as well as the claim to constitute “a new kind of aristocracy” (Charles Baudelaire), represent the proximity of the dandy to the political right. To this add the tendency of politically inclined dandies to declare a partiality to the Conservative Revolution or to its forerunners, as for instance Maurice Barrès in France, Gabriele d’Annunzio in Italy, Stefan George or Arthur Moeller van den Bruck in Germany. The Japanese author Yukio Mishima belongs to the later followers of this tendency.

Besides this tradition of right-wing anarchism, there has existed another, older and largely independent tendency, connected with specifically French circumstances. Here, at the end of the 18th century, in the later stages of the ancien régime, formed an anarchisme de droite, whose protagonists claimed for themselves a position “beyond good and evil,” a will to live “like the gods,” and who recognised no moral values beyond personal honour and courage. The world-view of these libertins was intimately connected with an aggressive atheism and a pessimistic philosophy of history. Men like Brantôme, Montluc, Béroalde de Verville and Vauquelin de La Fresnaye held absolutism to be a commodity that regrettably opposed the principles of the old feudal system, and that only served the people’s desire for welfare. Attitudes, which in the 19th century were again to be found with Arthur de Gobineau and Léon Bloy, and also in the 20th century with Georges Bernanos, Henry de Montherlant and Louis-Ferdinand Céline. This position also appeared in a specifically “traditionalist” version with Julius Evola, whose thinking revolved around the “absolute individual.”

In whichever form right-wing anarchism appears, it is always driven by a feeling of decadence, by a distaste for the age of masses and for intellectual conformism. The relation to the political is not uniform; however, not rarely does the aloofness revolve into activism. Any further unity is negated already by the highly desired individualism of right-wing anarchists. Nota bene, the term is sometimes adopted by men–for instance George Orwell (Tory anarchist) or Philippe Ariès–who do not exhibit relevant signs of a right-wing anarchist ideology; while others, who objectively exhibit these criteria–for instance Nicolás Gómez Dávila or Günter Maschke–do not make use of the concept.

Bibliography

Gruenter, Rainer. “Formen des Dandysmus: Eine problemgeschichtliche Studie über Ernst Jünger.” Euphorion 46 (1952) 3, pp. 170-201.
Kaltenbrunner, Gerd-Klaus, ed. Antichristliche Konservative: Religionskritik von rechts. Freiburg: Herder, 1982.
Kunnas, Tarmo. “Literatur und Faschismus.” Criticón 3 (1972) 14, pp. 269-74.
Mann, Otto. “Dandysmus als konservative Lebensform.” In Gerd-Klaus Kaltenbrunner, ed., Konservatismus international, Stuttgart, 1973, pp. 156-70.
Mohler, Armin. “Autorenporträt in memoriam: Henry de Montherlant und Lucien Rebatet.” Criticón 3 (1972) 14, pp. 240-42.
Richard, François. L’anarchisme de droite dans la littérature contemporaine. Paris: PUF, 1988.
______. Les anarchistes de droite. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1997.
Schwarz, Hans Peter. Der konservative Anarchist: Politik und Zeitkritik Ernst Jüngers. Freiburg im Breisgan, 1962.
Sydow, Eckart von. Die Kultur der Dekadenz. Dresden, 1921.

Updated News Digest June 5-6, 2010 1

American Revolutionary Vanguard: Loved By Few, Hated By Many, Respected By All

“Marcuse Is Dead…And We Have Killed Him.” -Quagmire, ATS Reader

“What we fight is is _State_ socialism, levelling from above, bureaucracy; what we advocate is free association and union, the absence of authority, mind freed from all fetters, independence and well-being of all. Before all others it is we who preach _tolerance_ for all – whether we think their opinions right or wrong – we do not wish to crush them by force or otherwise… If our ideas are wrong, let those who know better teach us better.”

Gustav Landauer, Social Democracy in Germany, Freedom Press 1896

Spontaneous Order

AlternativeRight.Com Is Now Live!

Community Organizing and National-Anarchism presentation by Andrew Yeoman

Tribal Anarchism Video Series Parts One, Two, Three, Four

United Anarchism Vs United Nationism

Fall of the New World Order

The Tyranny of “Tolerance”

“Isn’t it ironic that the government can criminally charge citizens with ‘conspiracy’ (an agreement or a partnership, not an action), but when a citizen even mentions that there is ample evidence (provided by the government’s own documents) that the government can and does conspire to commit and does commit various felonies, they are mocked, vilified, and labeled as kooks?

When the government came for militia, I remained silent; I was not militia.
When they locked up the religious conservatives, I remained silent; I was an atheist.
When they came for the bloggers, I remained silent; I was not a blogger.
When they came for the Muslims, I remained silent; I was not Muslim. When the came for me, there was no one left to speak out.”

Eli Cryderman

“There’s no difference between cops and outlaws.” Kim Fowley

“Two can keep a secret if one is dead.” –Hell’s Angels (attributed)

The National-Bolshevik Party: Breaking the Circle Jerk by Maury Knutson

Tea Party Dabbles in Revolution (Talk) by Maury Knutson

Total War and Civil Rights by William Norman Grigg

Freedom and Discrimination by Laurence Vance

The Civil Rights Myth: Integration and the End of Black Self-Reliance by Elizabeth Wright

Lift the Siege by Pat Buchanan

This Says It All by Justin Raimondo

Victimhood, Tribalism, and Aggression by Glenn Greenwald

A Tea Party to Nowhere by Philip Giraldi

Vietnam, Minus the Jungle by Peter Preston

Better Than Money by James Leroy Wilson

Rand Paul: Unprincipled Hero by Rand Paul

Pariah Nation by Alexander Cockburn

How Democracy Breeds Political Idiocy by James Bovard

Rogue State Politics by Anthony DiMaggio

Serving the Empire, Killing for Lies by Sheldon Richman

The Secret Truth About Government and Politics by Ralph Raico

Commie Social Gospel Types by Bill Anderson

Nazi Justice Coming to America by Peter Huebl

The Right to Discriminate by Walter Williams

Civil Rights and Freedom by Larry Elder

Power Elite Protectionism by Murray Rothbard

The Criminalization of Self-Defense by Massad Ayoob

U.S. Out of Korea (and Out of North America!) by Eric Margolis

Immigration: A Slightly Different Take by Fred Reed

The Prettification of War by John V. Walsh

The Revenge of the Paleos by Richard Spencer

Confessions of a Godless Man by Richard Hoste

“No Nation Has Ever Demonized Manhood to Its Own Reward” by Jack Donovan

World’s Oldest Marijuana Stash

Gangster Pulls Gun on Skater, Regrets It

“The Italians were called wops, the Jews were called hymies, I was of course a greaseball, and every Hispanic was a spic. Well, we all got along famously! It was rough, but it was fine.”

-Taki Theodoracopulos

“The “clash of civilizations” is, in a very literal sense, a clash of God and Mammon. The Islamic revolutionaries are driven by a fanatical devotion to their god and the promises they believe he has made to them if only they take up arms on his behalf. The nations of the West are driven by an almost as fanatical devotion to Mammon, that is, to wealth, luxury, power, pleasure and privilege. Further, the culture of the West combines this unabashedly materialist ethos with rejection of strength and discipline in favor of a maternalistic emphasis on health, safety, “sensitivity”, “self-esteem”, “potential”, “personal growth”, “getting in touch with one’s inner child”, “feelings” and other concepts common to pop culture psychobabble. Of course, the socio-cultural ramifications of this is to create a society of weaklings, mediocrities and crybabies.”

-Keith Preston

The Meek Shall Inherit Nothing -Frank Zappa

Uncle Remus -Frank Zappa

Life is war and conflict, struggle and strife, from conception till death…Never shall the lion lie down peacefully with the lamb…”

Why are those who espouse Univeral Love, Tolerance, and ‘Human Brotherhood,’ usually the most screwed up people you’ve ever met, socially and emotionally? Not to mention some of the nastiest and most self-centered narcissists around?”

-Chris Donnellan

“What You Believe is Not as Important as What You Do.”

-Andrew Yeoman

Audio Broadcasts

The Life of Rachel Corrie -Scott Horton interviews her parents

When Israel Murdered 34 Americans Ray McGovern interviewed by Scott Horton

Alex Kurtagic interviewed by Tomislav Sunic

A Nation of Sheep, Ruled by Wolves, Owned by Pigs

The Revolution Within Anarchism

Forty Years in the Wilderness?

Liberty and Populism: Building An Effective Resistance Movement for North America

Organizing the Urban Lumpenproletariat

National Anarchy and the American Idea

Don’t Talk to the Police

“The king is most wounded by ridicule.” -Thomas Hobbes

https://i2.wp.com/www.camodiva.com/assets/images/girls_guns_web.gif

https://i1.wp.com/www.treeworld.info/attachments/f36/8982d1229506754-girls-guns-gng-7.jpg

Dr. Tomislav Sunic interviews Keith Preston 4

The interview will be aired on Voice of Reason on Tuesday, June 8,  at 9 pm Eastern U.S time.

The Sunic Journal

An Interview with Keith Preston from Attack the System
sunic_04.jpgKeith Preston.jpg

On Tuesday, June 8, 2010, at 9 PM Eastern US time, Voice of Reason® will air Tom’s interview with renowned writer and revolutionary thinker Keith Preston.

How to listen and/or download the show for free is listed at the bottom of this page.

Topics for discussion will include:

· Pan-secessionism as the visionary tactic for detaching organically constituted communities from the Global-Bureaucratic Empire. An overarching empire that can easily be seen as the common enemy of all population groups.

· Keith gives Dr. Sunic and his listeners a broad overview of National Anarchism and its importance as a growing movement.

· The need for communities to regain their innate sense of self-determination by recognizing not only their uniqueness, but the “legitimacy of otherness.” For National Anarchists diversity isn’t simply a political locution used to browbeat white people, but something inherent in nature that must be respected.

· Keith and Tom discuss the mind and life of the legendary Warrior-Intellectual Ernst Junger. What follows is a development of Junger’s concept of the individual man as the “anarch.”

· Junger’s warrior ethos as a means for creating a truly free man who controls his own mind no matter how oppressive and ubiquitous the criminal state becomes.

About Keith Preston and his work:

To learn more about Keith and his ideas for “Pan-secessionism Against the Empire” please explore his website Attack the System. You can download his award-winning essay “Free Enterprise: The Antidote to Corporate Plutocracy” here. Keith has also written interesting and insightful essays for the Alternative Right.

Listening and download instructions:

The show will air on the Voice of Reason Broadcast Network. To tune in to the live feed for this and all VoR programming, click here to use Windows Media Player or here for Winamp.  For iTunes:  open iTunes, press Ctrl+U on your keyboard, copy/paste http://208.110.82.50/vor_high.pls into the Open Audio Stream dialog box, then click OK (you will now be able to listen to VoR live on iTunes any time by clicking on ‘Voice of Reason Broadcast Network’ in your music list).  If you cannot catch it as it airs on Tuesday, the interview will be archived in mp3 format for download on Tom’s page at the VoR site soon after the show ends (archived shows are listed on the right side of page).

Renaissance Party Update: My resignation 4

To those who have inquired about my present relationship with the Renaissance Party of North America:

Yesterday, I officially resigned all of my positions and offices within the party. I did this for several reasons. One was my dissatisfaction with the general direction of the party. Another was an emerging conflict of interest between my involvement with RPN and my pre-existing and ongoing involvements with other groups and tendencies. Yet another was my disagreement with criticisms made by one of the party’s leading figures against one of my close comrades and strongest allies. This is all I care to say about the issue publicly.

Memorial Day: Remembering the Dead 2

The true Memorial Day slogan should be: “Never Again.” -Jeremy Weiland

The idea of “democracy” has persuaded countless gullible people that they are somehow “consenting” when they are being coerced. The real triumph of the state occurs when its subjects refer to it as “we,” like football fans talking about the home team. That is the delusion of “self- government.” One might as well speak of “self-coercion” or “self-slavery.” –Joseph Sobran

by Anna Morgenstern (originally published by Center for a Stateless Society)

The government holiday now known as Memorial Day has become largely, in practice, ”Barbeque day” here in the USSA.  The purpose for which it was established is much more nefarious.  It is meant to be a memorial of the soldiers who died fighting for the government (specifically for Union soldiers after the Civil War, it was expanded after WWI).  But from an anti-state point of view, there is a good purpose in remembering our dead soldiers.  That would be the same as remembering the victims of any atrocity.  So that instead of saying “thanks for propping up our government” we can say “never again”.

The United States, like most nation-states I suspect, is chock full of war memorials.  Every city has a few.  The US has been a very warlike nation in its short history.  These memorials, in addition to a token pacification of the pain of losing family members in war, act as an incentive to potential new soldiers.  “If you should die fighting, we will remember your sacrifice.”  But what have they sacrificed for?  Despite what the propaganda saying says, they did not, in most cases, die for our freedom.

There are only two cases of US government war (post-revolution) where any sort of case could be made that the government was fighting for its citizens’ freedom:  The Civil War, and WWII.  Despite the fact that there is a growing  faction of people who argue otherwise, I think the Civil War has a decent case to be made.   Once the southern states seceded, there was no longer any sort of legislative possibility of freeing the slaves in those areas.  If the US had opened its border to fleeing slaves and gone as far as to extract them from the south, there likely would have been war anyway. And the southern states seceded, at least in part, over fears that slavery would be abolished.  However, even in this case, there is a lot of moral ambiguity.  Did the northern states emancipate their slaves in 1860?  Even the emancipation proclamation only claimed to free the slaves in the confederate territories.  And the war itself was conducted using tactics that amounted sometimes to crimes against humanity.  The Civil War was not explicitly fought in order to free the slaves, but to reclaim the territory of the southern states.   Does anyone believe that if the CSA had emancipated its slaves in 1861 that the US government would have called off the war?  Lincoln could have said something to this effect.  He could have said “we accept your right to secede, but we cannot accept your enslavement of millions.”  But of course he didn’t, and so the war was at best a dark grey affair.  It is this war which produced much of the war memorials and Memorial Day itself, as the government tried to pacify its people from the anguish and horror of what had just transpired.

As for WWII, the possibility of the Axis successfully taking North America may have been unlikely, but it was a real threat.  Hitler was working (somewhat unsuccessfully) on cruise missiles, long range bombers and nuclear weapons to use against us, and Japan had struck our shore.  So in this instance, there was a self-defense motivation to fight and win this war.  It has been argued that FDR intentionally manipulated the US into the war, which is entirely possible, yet it is also possible that Japan would have attacked us sooner or later anyway.  Our conduct in the war however amounted to mass murder of civilians through bombing, both nuclear and otherwise.  And let’s not forget the internment camps, where 100000+ US citizens were imprisoned simply for having Japanese ancestry.  WWII was also a direct result of the effects of WWI and the terrible, punitive conditions imposed on Germany by the Treaty Of Versailles.  And WWI was one war that the US entered simply for reasons of world domination, economic and otherwise.  Had we not entered, it is likely that the allies would not have been able to press for “unconditional surrender”.  As for the Jews, they were turned away from our shores during Hitler’s reign before, and even after we entered the war.  Not one bomb was dropped on the train tracks leading to the camps, though bombing raids were taking place nearby.  Why didn’t the US government say “Send us your huddled masses, even Jews, Gypsies and homosexuals”?  Again, this one is at best, a dark grey area.

Outside of these two conflicts, the US was involved militarily over and over simply for reasons of economic and political domination.  We still are today.  The extensive war in Afghanistan no longer has much if anything to do with Al Qaeda, if it ever did.  And Iraq is simply a case of US power politics taken to the level of mass murder.  You don’t have to poke very deeply to see the economic corruption behind the scenes of these wars, just as with Vietnam and Korea, Panama and Grenada, Cuba and the Phillipines.  General Smedley Butler gave a rather famous speech called “War is a Racket“, which he later expanded, and it’s still relevant today.  To quote one of the more well-known passages:

“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.”

Governments will always create pretexts, however thin, for their activities, especially war.  But in most cases, it is the same sort of business-government corruption that occurs throughout our economy, only writ large and more deadly.  So when you go about your memorializing this Memorial Day, please, remember those who died (unwittingly, for no soldier would openly fight for something as crass as gangsterism, unless he was getting a cut of the action, which in most cases, they don’t) both soldier and civilian, to fatten the pockets of the power elite.  And remember that as long as we have a power elite who historically have been willing to kill off entire cities to make a few extra bucks, we will always have war.  Remember that.  And if you do, perhaps one day we can honestly say “never again”.

Anna O. Morgenstern has been an anarchist of one stripe or another for almost 30 years. Her intellectual interests include economic history, social psychology and voluntary organization theory. She likes pina coladas, but not getting caught in the rain.

Updated News Digest May 28-30, 2010 6

“Marcuse Is Dead…And We Have Killed Him.” -Quagmire, ATS Reader

“What we fight is is _State_ socialism, levelling from above, bureaucracy; what we advocate is free association and union, the absence of authority, mind freed from all fetters, independence and well-being of all. Before all others it is we who preach _tolerance_ for all – whether we think their opinions right or wrong – we do not wish to crush them by force or otherwise… If our ideas are wrong, let those who know better teach us better.”

Gustav Landauer, Social Democracy in Germany, Freedom Press 1896

Spontaneous Order

AlternativeRight.Com Is Now Live!

Community Organizing and National-Anarchism presentation by Andrew Yeoman

Tribal Anarchism Video Series Parts One, Two, Three, Four

United Anarchism Vs United Nationism

Fall of the New World Order

The Tyranny of “Tolerance”

“Isn’t it ironic that the government can criminally charge citizens with ‘conspiracy’ (an agreement or a partnership, not an action), but when a citizen even mentions that there is ample evidence (provided by the government’s own documents) that the government can and does conspire to commit and does commit various felonies, they are mocked, vilified, and labeled as kooks?

When the government came for militia, I remained silent; I was not militia.
When they locked up the religious conservatives, I remained silent; I was an atheist.
When they came for the bloggers, I remained silent; I was not a blogger.
When they came for the Muslims, I remained silent; I was not Muslim. When the came for me, there was no one left to speak out.”

Eli Cryderman

“There’s no difference between cops and outlaws.” Kim Fowley

War, National Emergency, and “Continuity of Government” by Peter Dale Scott

The Absence of Debate Over War by Glenn Greenwald

Imperialism Makes Americans Less Free, Less Safe, Less Prosperous by David Gordon

Defend the Scoundrels by Ross Kenyon

The Five Most Popular Safety Laws That Don’t Work by Robert Evans

Communism’s Hidden History of Evil by Claire Berlinski

Does Everyone on the Planet Have a Right to Live in the U.S.? by Walter Williams

Property Rights, Liberty, and Immigration by Glenn Jacobs

The Trouble with the 1964 Civil Rights Act by Ron Paul

Getting It Backward by Kevin Carson

The State and the Energy Monopoly by Darian Worden

Civil Rights and the Libertarian Principle by Sheldon Richman

Liberty and Equality by James Leroy Wilson

How Can We Enforce “Rights”? by Butler Shaffer

“Kill Them All, for God Will Know His Own” by William Norman Grigg

The Overthrow of the WASPs by the PC Busy-Body, Do-Gooders by Taki Theodoracopulos

Food Riots, Tent Cities, Mob Rule by Gerald Celente

America Has Died by Doug Casey

Hoppe on Covenant Communities and Advocates of Alternative Lifestyles by Stephan Kinsella

Israel: The Strategic Ally Myth by Philip Giraldi

Rand Paul’s Problem, and Ours by Justin Raimondo

Our Vitriol, and Theirs by Justin Raimondo

My Four-Decade Fight to Report the Truth by Sydney Schanberg

Sometimes Conspiracy Theories Are True by Alexander Cockburn

Will Iraq Be Forgotten As Well? by Andrew Bacevich

Was Rambo Right? by Ron Unz

Those Irrational, Misled, Conspiratorial Muslims by Glenn Greenwald

Why Israel Has to Do Better by Peter Beinart

Chomsky at the Gate by Uri Avnery

The Rand and Rachel Show by Alexander Cockburn

The War Over America’s Past by Pat Buchanan

“The Italians were called wops, the Jews were called hymies, I was of course a greaseball, and every Hispanic was a spic. Well, we all got along famously! It was rough, but it was fine.”

-Taki Theodoracopulos

“The “clash of civilizations” is, in a very literal sense, a clash of God and Mammon. The Islamic revolutionaries are driven by a fanatical devotion to their god and the promises they believe he has made to them if only they take up arms on his behalf. The nations of the West are driven by an almost as fanatical devotion to Mammon, that is, to wealth, luxury, power, pleasure and privilege. Further, the culture of the West combines this unabashedly materialist ethos with rejection of strength and discipline in favor of a maternalistic emphasis on health, safety, “sensitivity”, “self-esteem”, “potential”, “personal growth”, “getting in touch with one’s inner child”, “feelings” and other concepts common to pop culture psychobabble. Of course, the socio-cultural ramifications of this is to create a society of weaklings, mediocrities and crybabies.”

-Keith Preston

Snuff by Slipknot (R.I.P. Paul Gray)

Life is war and conflict, struggle and strife, from conception till death…Never shall the lion lie down peacefully with the lamb…”

Why are those who espouse Univeral Love, Tolerance, and ‘Human Brotherhood,’ usually the most screwed up people you’ve ever met, socially and emotionally? Not to mention some of the nastiest and most self-centered narcissists around?”

-Chris Donnellan

“What You Believe is Not as Important as What You Do.”

-Andrew Yeoman

Audio Broadcasts

Obama’s Satanic Rouge Empire Naomi Wolf interviewed by Lew Rockwell

Medieval Political Ideas, Part One and Part Two by Matthew Raphael Johnson

An Interview With Jonathan Bowden by Tom Sunic

A Nation of Sheep, Ruled by Wolves, Owned by Pigs

The Revolution Within Anarchism

Forty Years in the Wilderness?

Liberty and Populism: Building An Effective Resistance Movement for North America

Organizing the Urban Lumpenproletariat

National Anarchy and the American Idea

Don’t Talk to the Police

“The king is most wounded by ridicule.” -Thomas Hobbes

New Posts at RATS Reply

The National-Anarchist Concept of Tribe

Why Be a National-Anarchist

Summer of ’69

Those of you who have “third way’ Anarchist blogs of your own (or are considering such) may wish to re-post some of these. I tried to keep things simple for newcomers. I posted the Mailer article because Mailer’s ideas have always seemed to me to be an excellent model for what the practical application of Anarchist, Libertarian, National-Anarchist, DeBenoistist, etc. ideas might be in a modern society.

We Need Volunteers, Damn It!! 10

Over the past month or so, I’ve probably had at least half a dozen conversations with different colleagues and comrades regarding the need to get this pan-secessionist, national-anarchist, tribal-anarchist, anarcho-pluralist, alternative right, conservative revolutionary, whatever we are movement off of the internet and into the realm of real-world action. Some of our colleagues (most notably, the Bay Area National Anarchists) are already doing this. So what are the rest of us waiting for?

I’ve come full circle on this. For some years (roughly 1986-1992) I was heavily involved in activism of all different kinds. If it was part of the radical Left during those years, I was part of it. After developing the desire to move past some of the deficiencies I found on the Left, I became inactive for a good number of years and devoted myself instead to private study, radical journalism, and what might be called “behind the scenes” efforts. I recall a conversation with a close comrade circa 2003 where I said that I wasn’t interested in any activism at that point, on the grounds that before we could have a fresh and dynamic radical movement, we first needed to have a solid intellectual foundation for such a movement. After observing subsequent events in radical circles for a few years after that, I wrote in 2006:

In the realm of strategy, I have to confess to being a fairly orthodox Bakuninist. This perspective emphasizes the necessity of a militant vanguard and conspiratorial secret societies composed of radical intellectuals and activists acting as a leadership corps of a larger populist movement of which the lumpenproletariat and the rural population are the class vanguard. This is the strategy that was utilized by history’s most successful anarchist movement, that of the Spanish anarchists. Indeed, it was Bakunin’s emissary Fanelli who first planted the seeds of what was to become classical Spanish anarchism. As I will attempt to demonstrate, this approach might be quite feasible for modern North America as well. At present, the primary intellectual framework of a new American radicalism is pretty well complete…

The next step is the assembling of the “principled militants” whom Bakunin recognized as the intellectual and activist vanguard of the insurgency. This is not to be confused with the Marxist-Leninist concept of the “vanguard” whose only purpose is the achievement of military dictatorship for the sake of managing a centrally planned economy. We are now in need of an organizational framework that can play the same role as that of the FAI in the development of Spanish anarchism. Translated into modern American terms, such an organization would be a combination think-tank and activist and propaganda front, sort of an anarchist alternative to ruling class entities of a similar nature…

Four years later, such “militant vanguard” groups have slowly started to emerge. With increasing frequency, websites, blogs, editorials, and new articles have started to appear that present the alternative anarchist tendencies, the alternative right, secession, and other related outlooks in a positive light. Consequently, our enemies have begun to take notice as well. Last night, it was suggested to me by a leading figure in the new radical milieu that there could and should be at least 30 alternative anarchist “tribes” active in North America. Unfortunately, there are only about five at present and plans for a few more in the works. Another comrade recently suggested to me that a present we have all the theoretical work floating around that we need at present, but what we are lacking are serious volunteers who can turn theory and action into strategy.

In recent times, as I’ve been working on networking projects for the North American secessionist movement, it has occurred to me that it will be the local groups who from the foundation of any future pan-secessionist effort. That has always been my position, but the difficulties I’ve encountered involving regional secessionist efforts have driven the point home further that localism is really where it’s at. With regards to secession, Norman Mailer rather than Jefferson Davis should be our role model. Some years ago I came up with an idea called the “100 Cities Project.” The idea was to find a hundred volunteers in a hundred different cities in the U.S. to run symbolic campaigns for mayor of their respective cities on Mailer’s model, and to do so simultaneously during the same election season so as to generate a blitz of media coverage regarding issues of decentralization and secession. But before such an effort could work, there would have to be strong local organizations capable of supporting such efforts with resources, time, and manpower.

So let’s get busy building functional and active local organization, collectives, “tribes” whatever we want to call them. Recently new groups have emerged in Dayton and Ontario. I’m told plans for a queer-oriented national-anarchist group are in the works. We can build local organizations around whatever themes or cultural identities the participant wish: race, ethnicity, sexuality, religion, class, ecology, philosophical beliefs, economic preferences, etc. There can be different groups for Eurocentrists, pagans, Christians, Muslims, queers, blacks, native peoples’, women, primitivists, anarcho-capitalists, syndicalists, Evolans, Nietzscheans, and so forth. But whatever our individual or collective preferences, let’s just get something going. With these considerations in mind, I am announcing the launching of a new project for my own local area, Richmond Attack the System (RATS).

Vote for Truth in Politics: Elect Linda McMahon Reply

I’ve often said the pro-wrestling industry is the best analogy for the American political system. It may no longer be an analogy. Thomas Knapp seems to agree.

She’s never held political office before (and she still faces a primary fight in August), but if she’s elected this November McMahon’s 30-year career in professional wrestling will make her a strong contender for the “Most Experienced Politician in American History” belt before she ever even sets foot on the Senate floor.

Professional wrestling, as exemplified by WWE, is the purest imaginable distillation of the political ethos as art, specifically theater. Its executives have created a fantasy world in which they and the other actors fight an ongoing series of epic battles — extended wars, even — over imaginary issues.

Questions for Pro-Immigrationists 4

These are some questions that left-wing proponents of mass immigration have never been able to answer satisfactorily (at least not to my satisfaction):

1. What will be the fate of such matters as womens’ rights, gay rights, church/state separation, free speech, freedom of the press, freedom of scientific inquiry, and exemption from excessively harsh punishment when Islamic fundamentalist parties become competitive in European elections?

2. Will not the allowance of mass Islamic immigration into the West eventually result in the overthrow of present day Enlightenment civilization in the same way that Christianity overthrew classical pagan civilization?

3. Will not mass immigration from Latin America into the U.S. not result in a replay of the Mexican War in the U.S. Southwest?

4. Will not the demographic threat posed by mass immigration result in the traditional ethnic and national groups of Europe and the Anglo nations going the same way as the American Indians?

5. If whites become a minority in the future America, will they not suffer the same fate as whites in present day Mugabe-ruled Zimbabwe? Are not whites legitimate in seeking to avoid such a fate for their posterity?

I’m still waiting for the answers.

Updated News Digest May 21-23, 2010 1

“Marcuse Is Dead…And We Have Killed Him.” -Quagmire, ATS Reader

“What we fight is is _State_ socialism, levelling from above, bureaucracy; what we advocate is free association and union, the absence of authority, mind freed from all fetters, independence and well-being of all. Before all others it is we who preach _tolerance_ for all – whether we think their opinions right or wrong – we do not wish to crush them by force or otherwise… If our ideas are wrong, let those who know better teach us better.”

Gustav Landauer, Social Democracy in Germany, Freedom Press 1896

Spontaneous Order

AlternativeRight.Com Is Now Live!

Community Organizing and National-Anarchism presentation by Andrew Yeoman

Tribal Anarchism Video Series Parts One, Two, Three, Four

United Anarchism Vs United Nationism

Fall of the New World Order

The Tyranny of “Tolerance”

“Isn’t it ironic that the government can criminally charge citizens with ‘conspiracy’ (an agreement or a partnership, not an action), but when a citizen even mentions that there is ample evidence (provided by the government’s own documents) that the government can and does conspire to commit and does commit various felonies, they are mocked, vilified, and labeled as kooks?

When the government came for militia, I remained silent; I was not militia.
When they locked up the religious conservatives, I remained silent; I was an atheist.
When they came for the bloggers, I remained silent; I was not a blogger.
When they came for the Muslims, I remained silent; I was not Muslim. When the came for me, there was no one left to speak out.”

Eli Cryderman

“There’s no difference between cops and outlaws.” Kim Fowley

https://i1.wp.com/airbornecombatengineer.typepad.com/photos/girls_with_guns/wtf200707141ace.jpg

Fear of a Free Planet by Anna Morgenstern

NEW!!-The Armed Struggle Escalates

A Slow Burn Bonfire of the Liberties by Mark Steyn

PIGS Murder 7-Yr-Old Girl in Detroit by William Norman Grigg

Obama and Civil Liberties by John Whitehead

The $PLC Publishes Its Latest Hit List

Secessionist Sympathies Continue to Grow by Chuck Baldwin

Boutique Liberals Blowing Smoke by Maury Knutson

Reanimating Reagan by Maury Knutson

Running of the Bullshit by Maury Knutson

Not Another War, Mr. President! by Justin Raimondo

How to Survive Traffic Stops in the New America by Eric Peters

Take the Deal, Mr. President by Pat Buchanan

Pat Buchanan Under Attack by the Censors

Learning How to Disappear by Frank M. Ahearn

Representative Democracy Sucks! by Jim Fedako

Rand Paul’s Moment, Ron Paul’s Opportunity by Brent Budowsky

Defaults Ahead: America, Europe, China by Gary North

Time to Stop Demonizing the Germans by Ralph Raico

The Coming Sedition Act by Robert Ringer

Can a Christian Kill for His Government? by Laurence Vance

Obama’s Gulf of Tonkin by Justin Raimondo

Imagine How Pakistanis Feel About Drone Strikes by Joanne Mariner

From Safe Republic to Unsafe Empire by Bruce Fein

How Many U.S. Progressives Please the Right-Wing Israel Lobby by Ira Chernus

The End of the World As We Know It? by Stephen Walt

Ex-Cop Tells Pot Smokers How to Outsmart the PIGS by Michael May

PIGS Murder Oklahoma Man from The Aging Rebel

Getting to Know Elena Kagan by Ralph Nader

Noam Chomsky Denied Entry Into Israel by Simon McGregor-Wood

Closet Politics by Alexander Cockburn

Nepal’s First Days of May by Jed Brandt

Is There Hope for a Two-State Solution? by Naseer Aruri

Update on the Hutaree Hullabaloo by Chuck Baldwin

Putting Whitey In His Place by Paul Gottfried

Heroin and the U.S. Empire by Mark Hackard

Woody Allen: Total Idiot by Angel Lorenz

Elena Kagan and the Decline of WASP America by Kevin MacDonald

Generation X Justice by David Michael Green

Viva La Revolucion by Vox Day

Italian PIGS Get Five Years for Attacks on G8 Protestors by John Hooper

Saudi Woman Retaliates Against PIG

No Victim, No Crime by Laurence Vance

Beware a Centralized Europe by Ron Holland

“The Italians were called wops, the Jews were called hymies, I was of course a greaseball, and every Hispanic was a spic. Well, we all got along famously! It was rough, but it was fine.”

-Taki Theodoracopulos

“The “clash of civilizations” is, in a very literal sense, a clash of God and Mammon. The Islamic revolutionaries are driven by a fanatical devotion to their god and the promises they believe he has made to them if only they take up arms on his behalf. The nations of the West are driven by an almost as fanatical devotion to Mammon, that is, to wealth, luxury, power, pleasure and privilege. Further, the culture of the West combines this unabashedly materialist ethos with rejection of strength and discipline in favor of a maternalistic emphasis on health, safety, “sensitivity”, “self-esteem”, “potential”, “personal growth”, “getting in touch with one’s inner child”, “feelings” and other concepts common to pop culture psychobabble. Of course, the socio-cultural ramifications of this is to create a society of weaklings, mediocrities and crybabies.”

-Keith Preston

The Metal by Tenacious D

Tribute by Tenacious D

Master Exploder by Tenacious D

Life is war and conflict, struggle and strife, from conception till death…Never shall the lion lie down peacefully with the lamb…”

Why are those who espouse Univeral Love, Tolerance, and ‘Human Brotherhood,’ usually the most screwed up people you’ve ever met, socially and emotionally? Not to mention some of the nastiest and most self-centered narcissists around?”

-Chris Donnellan

“What You Believe is Not as Important as What You Do.”

-Andrew Yeoman

Audio Broadcasts

Alternative Right Radio

Antiwar Radio

Antiwar Left is Back in Gear Debra Sweet interviewed by Scott Horton

Private Violence is Bad James Bovard interviewed by Scott Horton

Medieval Political Ideas, Part One by Matthew Raphael Johnson

A Speech from Flanders by Tom Sunic

American Police Murder With Impunity Will Grigg interviewed by Scott Horton

Obama’s Iran Treachery Gareth Porter interviewed by Scott Horton

Iraq Still a Total Disaster Area Patrick Cockburn interviewed by Scott Horton

A Nation of Sheep, Ruled by Wolves, Owned by Pigs

The Revolution Within Anarchism

Forty Years in the Wilderness?

Liberty and Populism: Building An Effective Resistance Movement for North America

Organizing the Urban Lumpenproletariat

National Anarchy and the American Idea

Don’t Talk to the Police

“The king is most wounded by ridicule.” -Thomas Hobbes