| ◼ The greater the degree of control exerted by a regime, the greater the responsibility it will be seen to bear when things go wrong. In Iran, the economy has gone very wrong indeed. The country’s currency, the rial, has fallen by about 60 percent against the dollar since June. Annual inflation was over 40 percent in December, and food inflation is approaching twice that. GDP is falling, and public services are increasingly unreliable. In a wave of demonstrations across much of the country, protesters have called for regime change, greater freedom, and even, in some cases, for the return of the monarchy. The 2022–23 protests, after the death of Mahsa Amini, eventually petered out, their momentum broken by the regime’s violent response and by mass arrests. The Trump administration should continue to make clear that its sympathies lie with the protesters, and, if circumstances warrant, it should press harder. There should be no question of relaxing sanctions. And if this crisis offers any opportunities to disrupt Iran’s rebuilding of its nuclear program or its networks throughout the Middle East, they should be taken.
◼ Trump is right to want to advance American interests in Greenland. The Arctic is rapidly becoming an arena of geopolitical competition with Russia and even China. But the administration’s approach to this issue has been crass, clumsy, and counterproductive, including not-so-veiled threats of annexation. Yes, the U.S. could easily take Greenland (a largely self-governing part of Denmark), but, in all likelihood, that would come at the cost of shattering NATO. We could win an island but lose a continent. We should replace stick with carrot and rebuild our relations with Copenhagen and, critically, the independence-minded Greenlanders. Given shared interests between the U.S. and Denmark, the U.S. ought to be well placed to build up its defenses in Greenland and cut a good deal over exploiting the island’s rich reserves of critical minerals. With tact, finesse, and patience, Trump could get what he wants. Maybe give those qualities a try?
◼ Brigitte Bardot’s conservative Parisian parents bristled at her early desire to act. But she became more than just a movie star—she was an emblem of cultural transformation. As the sexual revolution began at the end of the 1950s, her brazen eroticism and carefree spirit represented a hedonistic shift in mores. After working as a model, she made her big-screen debut as a teenager with a minor role in Jean Boyer’s Crazy for Love (1952). At 23, she became a worldwide sensation when she starred in Roger Vadim’s And God Created Woman (1956), which captivated American audiences. She retired in 1973, after building an oeuvre largely defined by melodramas and insubstantial comedies, but her star power never waned. Later in life, she became a staunch advocate of animal rights. In the 2000s, her commentary on Islam and on homosexuality attracted ire—and the French government fined her five times for incitement. In all aspects of life, Bardot was defiantly herself. Dead at 91. R.I.P.
◼ Michael Edward Reagan, the adopted son of Ronald Reagan and his first wife, Jane Wyman, initially seemed unlikely to follow in his father’s footsteps. After struggling in high school and dropping out of college, he became a record-setting powerboat racing champion, then moved through a series of jobs in sales. In 1988, he published On the Outside Looking In, a revealing account of his troubled early life. The book portrayed his father as detached, and it briefly strained their relationship. But as the 1990s dawned, Michael became a staunch advocate of his father’s legacy. As a talk radio host and a syndicated columnist, he championed the ideas that made the Reagan revolution a transformative force, arguing for limited government, economic freedom, and traditional values. He celebrated his father’s accomplishments and criticized Republicans who, in his view, invoked Reagan’s name without embodying what he stood for. Dead at 80. R.I.P.
◼ For almost a decade, CIA officer Aldrich Ames made a fortune by betraying his country. After Ames dropped out of college in 1962, his father, a CIA analyst, helped him secure a job at the agency. In the years that followed, Ames rose through the ranks, eventually becoming head of the Soviet counterintelligence division. He turned to espionage in 1985, when he sold names of U.S. spies to the KGB for $50,000. Initially, he sought the money to pay his debts, but greed and alcoholism motivated him to continue. By the time of his arrest in 1994, after which he spent the rest of his life in prison, Ames had exposed almost all of America’s spies in the Soviet Union and compromised its operations around the world. In return, he had received more than $2.7 million from the KGB. He used the money to live lavishly, while his treachery caused at least ten allied intelligence agents to be executed. His life is a monument to the evil of deception. Dead at 84. |