Culture Wars/Current Controversies

How the Online Right Fell Apart

By Sam Kriss, Damage Mag

Behind the scenes, the online Right is just as divided as the Left—and it’s adopted many of its pathologies too. Are we facing a fascist coup, or just a collapse into political confusion?

How the Online Right Fell Apart
Before “weird” became the summer’s hottest and most contentious political insult, JD Vance cheerfully admitted to being “plugged into a lot of weird, right-wing subcultures.” Thanks to his candidacy, those subcultures are now being raked over by outlets like Politico and the New Republic. There’s some prim laughter at figures like Rod Dreher, who attributes most political events to the action of literal demons, or Curtis Yarvin, who wants to make the President of the United States into an absolute monarch. But behind these figures, the liberal press are starting to trace the outlines of something ugly. As liberalism stagnates, and with the Left absent from the stage of history, all the intellectual energy is now on the Right. The campus conservatives, the doughy GOP staffers, the army of worker-ants that keep right-wing politics running—they’re all marinating in an entirely new ideological sauce. The new Right, the dissident Right, the postliberal Right: extremely online and extremely hostile to the ordinary liberal principles of representation, individualism, and pluralism. They’re not pretending to read Locke anymore; they’re pretending to read Schmitt. Now they want to test out their ideas on the world.

None of this is untrue, exactly. There’s a growing infrastructure laundering fringe anti-democratic ideas and piping them into the heart of the Republican Party. But this is where most accounts of the new intellectual Right leave off. The clue to a fuller account is in the name: the new, dissident, postliberal Right are only united by what they claim to be opposing and superseding. This doesn’t get noticed much outside the online Right itself; everyone seems to think their own political faction is hopelessly divided, while their enemies are creepily unanimous. But when the liberal world order inevitably collapses and a bold new ideology rises from the ashes, what will that actually look like? Depends who you ask.

There’s a faction in the online Right that wants to build a Nordic-style social democracy, with strong labor unions, state control of industry, and a robust welfare state. (As Succession put it, “Medicare for All, abortions for none.”) So far, their plan to get there mostly seems to consist of writing long essays on Foucault. The monarchists, meanwhile, want a stratified, techno-feudal society of cyber-aristocrats and forelock-tugging digi-serfs. Some prefer Donald Trump to be their emperor, but by no means all. Plenty would be perfectly happy with Kamala Harris, as long as she uses the full power of the state to mercilessly crush all opposition. Yarvin, their intellectual godfather, is still formally endorsing Biden, despite his having dropped out. There’s a surprisingly influential faction of the American Right that wants to build a new political order based on Pindar’s Odes—a collection of lyric poems honoring the great athletes of the fifth century BC—and also eating raw eggs. A persistent current wants to turn the state into a minor facet of the Catholic Church. It’s true that less than a quarter of the country is actually Catholic, but maybe enough immigration from Latin America could yet transform the USA into the Empire of Our Lady of Guadalupe. There are even currents on the online Right who believe that the Caribbean was originally settled by white-skinned men from the North Pole, or possibly outer space. Others are outright neo-Nazis. That last group seems plain next to their neighbors. Unimaginative.

READ MORE

Leave a Reply