Some great new interviews from Richard.
Gottfried nails it once again in this discussion of Kagan from AltRight.
An overweight Jewish lesbian, whose career seems to have been put on fast track by her political supporters both inside and outside the media and someone who if she held diametrically opposed views, would not even be considered for a grounds crew post at Harvard, she is the quintessential symbol of Obama’s America. Her praise for her mentor Thurgood Marshall, whose “glory” it was to have acknowledged “special rights for the disadvantaged and despised,” does not in any way represent Christian or bourgeois morality. It is a ridiculous parody of what Nietzsche described as the behavior of the “Last Man,” the type of decadent who combines slave morality with philistine tastelessness. Kagan not only looks the part of this Last Man. She is the real article, no less than her fellow-law professors in the Ivy League and their imitators in the Bush League, who spend their time and energy instructing judges and state administrators on the practices and intricacies of victimology.
Also, check out Gottfried’s discussion in the Comments section of the relationship between Cultural Marxism and the so-called “Jewish Question.”
As for the chicken and egg conundrum and the Jewish question, I think there is no necessary relation between Jewish economic and social success and Jewish support for cultural Marxism. Jews are cultural Marxists because they fear an intact Christian bourgeois society, which they see as an historic enemy. They therefore try to neutralize the perceived or imaginary enemy in order to survive as a supposedly endangered minority. Jewish support for the cultural Left and its allies in government does no more to advance Jewish interests than Hitler’s decision to persecute Jews. It is an entirely irrational as well as destructive response to a fictitious friend/enemy distinction, albeit one that Jewish organizations like the ADA and Canadian Jewish Congress frenetically endorse.
It does not suggest a Jewish conspiracy but the superior skill of Jews in comparison to other predominantly leftist groups, like Irish Catholics, blacks and Hispanics, in organizing cultural Marxist politics. Since white Protestants are deteriorating into Lindsay Graham Republicans or worse, there is no effective opposition any longer to the transformative mission of the media and managerial state. Among those pushing us into anarcho-tyranny or cultural Marxist madness, Jews are simply better than their allies, like Patrick Leahy, Joe Biden, John Keary and the members of the Black Caucus.
“The sheer number of people killed by states in the
twentieth century—up to 100 million, with more killed in peacetime
“social reconstruction” than in wars—makes one suspect
that state-provided security is extremely expensive in all respects
and that meaningful alternatives have been overlooked.”
Thanks to our Las Vegas friends for digging this Rasmussen study up. These numbers are basically the same as those revealed by the Zogby poll two years ago. Apparently, the numbers have remained the same even with a change in the ruling party. I’d be curious how the Rasmussen numbers break down on demographic lines. The Zogby poll showed secessionist support had something of a leftward slant, with liberals, youth, the less educated, low income, and minorities being somewhat more sympathetic. I wonder if the demographics have shifted rightward during the Age of Obama, even if the overall numbers have remained the same.
Our primary goal should be to push these numbers upward on a continual basis. For instance, over the years I’ve seen support for issues or movements like gay rights and marijuana legalization gradually rise from the same kinds of numbers secessionists have at present to being an almost majority nationwide at present. That’s happened in roughly twenty years. I’ve outlined a forty-year plan for our movement. In twenty years we need to have at least as much support for the mere right of secession as things like marijuana decriminalization or gay marriage have at present, and the size of actual secession movements and their support has to show a corresponding increase. Right now ten percent of the U.S. population thinks secession would be good, and another twenty percent is on the fence. We need to get a solid thirty percent in our camp within the next decade or two. By the year 2050, we need to have a majority of the U.S. population in favor of actual secession by their particular region or community, and an even larger majority in favor to the technical right of secession, just like a majority of Americans presently support abortion rights, even if some of them are personally opposed to abortion or would not participate in it.
See Andrew’s contribution here.
Rothbard’s classic Nations by Consent: Decomposing the Nation-State
I generally agree with Rothbard’s position as outlined here, with the exception that I would take a looser, more open-ended definition of property rights or “private property” than Rothbard’s strict Lockeanism.
The question of open borders, or free immigration, has become an
accelerating problem for classical liberals. This is first, because the welfare
state increasingly subsidizes immigrants to enter and receive permanent
assistance, and second, because cultural boundaries have become increas-
ingly swamped. I began to rethink my views on immigration when, as
the Soviet Union collapsed, it became clear that ethnic Russians had been
encouraged to flood into Estonia and Latvia in order to destroy the
cultures and languages of these peoples. Previously, it had been easy to
dismiss as unrealistic Jean Raspail’s anti-immigration novel The Camp
of the Saints, in which virtually the entire population of India decides to
move, in small boats, into France, and the French, infected by liberal
ideology, cannot summon the will to prevent economic and cultural
national destruction. As cultural and welfare-state problems have inten-
sified, it became impossible to dismiss Raspail’s concerns any longer.
However, on rethinking immigration on the basis of the anarcho-
capitalist model, it became clear to me that a totally privatized country
would not have “open borders” at all. If every piece of land in a country
were owned by some person, group, or corporation, this would mean
that no immigrant could enter there unless invited to enter and allowed
to rent, or purchase, property. A totally privatized country would be as
“closed” as the particular inhabitants and property owners desire. It seems
clear, then, that the regime of open borders that exists de facto in the
U.S. really amounts to a compulsory opening by the central state, the
state in charge of all streets and public land areas, and does not gen-
uinely reflect the wishes of the proprietors.
Under total privatization, many local conflicts and “externality”
problems-not merely the immigration problem-would be neatly set-
tled. With every locale and neighborhood owned by private firms, cor-
porations, or contractual communities, true diversity would reign, in
accordance with the preferences of each community. Some neighborhoods
would be ethnically or economically diverse, while others would be
ethnically or economically homogeneous. Some localities would permit
pornography or prostitution or drugs or abortions, others would pro-
hibit any or all of them. The prohibitions would not be state imposed,
but would simply be requirements for residence or use of some person’s
or community’s land area. While statists who have the itch to impose
their values on everyone else would be disappointed, every group or
interest would at least have the satisfaction of living in neighborhoods
of people who share its values and preferences. While neighborhood
ownership would not provide Utopia or a panacea for all conflicts, it
would at least provide a “second-best” solution that most people might
be willing to live with.
New Albany IN cop probed for missing sensitivity class ordered after he said that civil rights was biggest mistake in US: http://is.gd/d0Zg4
Camden NJ cop sentenced to probation for ordering women into his truck and cruiser while in uniform & then groping them: http://is.gd/d3HUW
Bal Harbour FL cop takes plea deal after sexually assaulting a 7yr-old girl http://is.gd/cXQiV
Houston TX 4 cops involved in videotaped beating of cuffed 16yr-old suspect http://is.gd/d0PHy
Louisville KY police accused of using excessive force on nude 19yr-old suffering from apparent mental condition: http://is.gd/d04JZ
Palm Beach Co FL sheriff says county’s ethics rules don’t apply to him, orders officers to refuse to take ethics classes: http://is.gd/cYsDR
3 Parkersburg WV cops sued alleging they used anti-gay slurs when they beat & kicked man at his home in front of partner: http://is.gd/d5FVF
Baltimore MD school police officer found guilty of 2nd degree assault & sexual abuse of a 16yr-old female student: http://is.gd/d000g
Tybee GA police officer resigns over tasering of autistic teen: http://is.gd/d4oba
North Carolina State trooper resigns after drunk driving and hit & run charges: http://is.gd/d3HpX
Chaves County NM deputy fired for crashing into fence post w/cruiser while talking on cell, then lying about it: http://is.gd/d1mDK
San Francisco CA police accused of not divulging that cop testifying in case once stabbed suspect in face w/crack pipe: http://is.gd/cZslS
Macon GA police officer charged with battery & cruelty to children for hitting wife in front of grandkids: http://is.gd/cZlyU
Marco Island FL police sued by pharmacy alleging cops are intentionally harassing their customers to ruin their business: http://is.gd/d1uKe
San Francisco CA police sgt subject of lawsuit by ex-cop claiming she was forced out after refusing his sexual advances: http://is.gd/d1bQg
Maywood CA lays off employees & shuts down services after unable to afford insurance because of police misconduct costs: http://is.gd/d03gE
Bartlett TN police accused in suit of hiding years of abuse woman suffered at hands of cop who doused her in gasoline: http://is.gd/d0NA1
Chicago IL may settle suit for $6.3mil to man wrongfully imprisoned for 25yrs when police lab allegedly withheld evidence http://is.gd/d3V9m
Brunswick FL police chief admits to misleading officials about cop disciplined for lying about sex with a prostitute: http://is.gd/cZVtf
Clackamas County OR deputy charged for sexual misconduct w/women in jail and on home detention: http://is.gd/d1f58
Millville NJ police officer charged with domestic violence on allegations he grabbed an unspecified woman by the neck: http://is.gd/d4NjO
California Hwy Patrol officer convicted on bribery & perjury charges for dismissing traffic ticket in exchange for sex: http://is.gd/cYpq0
Sealy TX police officer subject of suit alleging he entered home w/o warrant then arrested man for taking picture of him: http://is.gd/d15Ty
Memphis TN police sergeant pleads guilty to embezzling $25k from police union he led: http://is.gd/d0TYz
US State Department diplomatic security agent gives wife brain damage in fight when she accused him of affair: http://is.gd/d2v3g
Los Angeles Co CA deputy’s union fights policy banning deputies from carrying guns when drunk as alcohol incidents climb: http://is.gd/d00FB
Durham County NC deputy accused of using excessive force on 78yr-old man w/alzheimer’s: http://is.gd/d18Bo
Ottawa Hills OH cop convicted of assault for shooting & paralyzing man at traffic stop: http://is.gd/cXQwe
NY Video released in trial of NYPD officer for repeatedly beating Iraq war vet with baton: http://is.gd/cYf8u
Jacksonville FL settles $200k suit to family of 80yr-old man killed after confronting cops posing as dealers on his lawn: http://is.gd/cYdvD
Broward County FL deputy charged w/fraud for filing false accident report to get insurance refund: http://is.gd/d1mqA
Chattanooga TN cop on paid leave while investigated for blocking man from getting wife to ER & arresting him for trying: http://is.gd/cXRMf
Duluth GA police officer found guilty on 9 counts for attacking woman at roadside and shooting fellow cop in drunken rage http://is.gd/d3YfM
North Las Vegas NV cop who resigned after lying about badge stopping bullet arrested on false reporting & firearm charges http://is.gd/cZP1Q
4 Greenville SC deputies subject of suit by 18yr old beaten in recorded incident: http://is.gd/cWKLH
3 Buffalo NY cops suspended 1mo w/o pay for drinking at bar & assaulting: http://is.gd/d2jsV
New York NY police subject of wrongful death suit alleging they let innocent man die in custody by denying him insulin: http://is.gd/cWNjl
North Dakota State trooper arrested on misdemeanor DV charge, allegedly punched & kicked wife while she held their baby: http://is.gd/d33Qk
Bakersfield CA cop arrested for driving under the influence and hit & run in his patrol car: http://is.gd/d5Iho
Bridgeport CT loses suit for $300k to man who suffered skull fracture & blinded in one eye when beaten at traffic stop: http://is.gd/d0N3x
Texas DPS trooper pleads guilty to choking man at church & theft via swapped tags at store http://is.gd/d3Ncd
Sacramento Co CA deputy under investigation for allegedly punching woman at dog park over dog fight: http://is.gd/cVZPG
New York NY 2 men and 2 boys unlawfully arrested for having a water balloon fight: http://is.gd/cZIo3
Farmington NH police detective indicted for stealing over $1,000 from evidence after investigation into missing items: http://is.gd/d0cr5
Dayton OH settles suit for $27k to couple who racked up $64k in medical bills after hit by patrol car going wrong way: http://is.gd/d0QCs
Luzerne PA hires 2 cops fired from other departments for their new police department, one of which has criminal record: http://is.gd/d3ePr
Solon OH police accused of profiling after cops cuff & hold 16 & 12yr old kids at gun point looking for adult suspect: http://is.gd/d2hAf
So says E. J. Dionne, and old-style “vital center” type. What a dickhead. If only the Right was as radically anti-statist as he claims.
American Revolutionary Vanguard: Loved By Few, Hated By Many, Respected By All
“Marcuse Is Dead…And We Have Killed Him.” -Quagmire, ATS Reader
“What we fight is is _State_ socialism, leveling from above, bureaucracy; what we advocate is free association and union, the absence of authority, mind freed from all fetters, independence and well-being of all. Before all others it is we who preach _tolerance_ for all – whether we think their opinions right or wrong – we do not wish to crush them by force or otherwise… If our ideas are wrong, let those who know better teach us better.”
–Gustav Landauer, Social Democracy in Germany, Freedom Press 1896
Against the Empire: Defeating Imperialism Through Secession by Michael Cushman
How Many Americans Can Obama Kill? by Glenn Greenwald
A “Do Over” in Afghanistan by Stephen Walt
Israel Policy: Ignorance or Cynicism? by M.J. Rosenberg
America’s Alliances: Time for a Second Look? by Michael Scheuer
An Increasingly Politicized Military by Bruce Ackerman
Cause and Effect in the War on Terror by Glenn Greenwald
Did Bush and Company Do Medical Research on Detainees? by Sheldon Richman
Is There an End in Sight in Afghanistan? by Robert Fox
The Abolition of Nuclear Weapons Requires the End of the U.S. Empire by Robert Jensen
McChrystal Did Obama a Huge Favor by Alexander Cockburn
Putting Petraeus in Perspective by Patrick Cockburn
Losing It at the Airport Checkpoint by Ralph Nader
Killing Civilians, Ducking Blame by Kathy Kelly and Dan Pearson
The System and the Drug War by Adam Engel
Is Petraeus McChrystal’s Replacement or Obama’s? by Paul Craig Roberts
A Call to Resist the IMF from Infoshop.Org
Santa Cruz Anarchists Seek to “De-Mystify Anarchy” by J.M. Brown
Concerning the Social War in Greece from Infoshop.Org
Demonstration of Anarchists in Solidarity with Prisoners from Infoshop.Org
McChrystal: Past, Present, and Future by Karen Kwiatkowski
Murder With Malice Aforethought by Arthur Silber
Kill the “Kill Switch” by Justin Raimondo
McChrystal’s Challenge by Justin Raimondo
Glenn Beck’s South-Bashing by Stonewall
Trouble in Cosmoterian Land: Dave Weigal Resigns by Red Phillips
The Need for Secession by Patroon
A Native American on the Racist American Empire by Dennis Steele
On the Social Construction of Race by John Howard
Is World Peace Possible? by Oswald Spengler
The End of Our Culture? by James Leroy Wilson
Who Would Maintain Roads Worse Than the State? by Darian Worden
PIG Slams Elderly Woman’s Head in the Concrete from Francois Tremblay
Defiance is in Our DNA by Ted Nugent
Why I Hate Harry Truman by Justin Raimondo
Five Months of Packing Heat by Manuel Lora
Smile for the Fuzz by Paul Huebl
“Play It, James!” by Gary North
Libertarians in a State-Run World by Murray Rothbard
Police State Rule # 1 by William Norman Grigg
The Urgent Case for Nullification by Tom Eddlem
Is America Destined to Starve? by Philip Parham
The Feds Wrecked an Entire Town by Bill Anderson
Americans Are Barely Hanging On by Gary North
School is a Twelve Year Jail Sentence by John Taylor Gatto
PIGS Taser Granny by William Norman Grigg
The PIGS Murdered a Dog by David Kramer
PIGS Without Brains by William Norman Grigg
Off-Duty Crimes by Butler Shaffer
Possession of Any Drug Has Been Legal in Portugal Since 2001 by David Kramer
Liberal Double Talk: A New Form of Political Brainwashing by Dr. Tomislav Sunic
Why Multiculturalism Is Doomed by Dr. Tomislav Sunic
Obama Is Still Imprisoning Innocent Men Andy Worthington interviewed by Scott Horton
Don’t Let Them Shut Down the Internet Bruce Schneier interviewed by Scott Horton
Community Organizing and National-Anarchism presentation by Andrew Yeoman
“A centralised democracy may be as tyrannical as an absolute monarch; and if the vigour of the nation is to continue unimpaired, each individual, each family, each district, must preserve as far as possible its independence, its self-completeness, its powers and its privilege to manage its own affairs and think its own thoughts.
–James Anthony Froude (1818-1894), author and historian.
Source: Short Studies on Great Subjects
A Nation of Sheep, Ruled by Wolves, Owned by Pigs
“The king is most wounded by ridicule.” -Thomas Hobbes
A post at the Forums of the Libertarian Left:
“I think our mistake (tempted by Aster) was to denounce Keith Preston, as an homophobe, far rightist. What an idiocy it was. Keith Preston is nothing but a Leftist frustrated with the petty-bourgeois (or haute-bourgeious) Champagne Left. He reminds of Greek curmudgeonly Stalinists, who denounce everything New Leftist as “anti-worker” and “a bourgeious disorder” (not that they are completely wrong)… The Communist Party of Greece is (in)famous for doing exactly the same thing as Keith Preston. It has struggled to destroy the New Left influence in every possible way, by denouncing it in the same ways that our guest Quagmire did, even glossing over or directly cooperating with the Hard Right. Yet no-one DARES to attack it as anti-Leftist (in fact the opposite has happened. Every feminist, Gay Liberationist is condemned as anti-worker, and suspected of neoliberal tendencies. Only Green ideology is allowed, since CPG is turning increadingly Malthusian). I personally don’t dislike Keith Preston at all, I just think he is misguided. In fact, I would say that if Prestonism (in the form of his Liberty and Populism essay, not its current Ultra-Far/Right-friendly form) was imported to Greece, I would consider it the greatest thing since sliced bread. Not only it would be the best possible substitute of Stalinism, and ironically it would considered as “intellectually renewing” the Far Left.”
It’s interesting how these folks have to put labels on or categorize everything: “Maybe Keith Preston’s not a Fascist after all, maybe he’s a Communist!”
The “Liberty and Populism” essay is still the foundation of my outlook and program. In fact, soon I will be developing it into a script for a video documentary to be produced by one of our ARV/ATS associates. As for my involvement with Alternative Right, apparently these folks don’t understand the difference between an intellectual circle and a political movement. Alternative Right is not a party, but a collection of writers and thinkers. Just like the Weimar intellectual circle around Ernst Junger included the left-wing Nazis Otto and Gregor von Strasser, the Jewish anarchist Erich Muhsam, the national-bolshevik Ernst Niekisch, and the Hobbesian Carl Schmitt, so does Alternative Right include a Catholic traditionalist (Jim Kalb), a Russian nationalist (Nina Kouprianova), a racialist anarcho-capitalist (Richard Hoste), a gay-masculinist ex-Satanist (Jack Donovan), a neo-pagan white nationalist (Alex Kurtagic), a curmudgeonly Old Rightist (Paul Gottfried), and a Nietzschean-Bakuninist old anarchist (yours truly). Richard Spencer himself seems to lean towards paleolibertarianism. As a hat tip to one of the conventional pieties of our time, we might call this “diversity.”
1. The Populist Right: A wide assortment of sub-tendencies including gun rights, white rights, religious rights, men’s rights, father’s rights, family rights, alternative medicine, home schoolers, conspiracists, militias, state’s rights, local sovereignty, pro-life, hard money, libertarian, anti-tax. Eventually more and more from these camps will recognize that they have no prospect of victory within the context of the present system and will begin looking for alternatives.
2. The Sinking Former Middle Class: Class divisions in the U.S. will increasingly resemble those of Latin America, and when that happens the former middle class will be PISSED!
3. The Antiwar/Civil Liberties Left: Expect a major split in the future between this Left and the race/gender/gay identity politics/welfare state Left.
4. The Urban Underclass: Expect no revolution without gaining the support of this class. To win, we must control the major cities, and we do that by gaining the support of this class.
5. The Lumpenproletariat: Broadly defined as traditional outgroups who were never incorporated into the Left’s pantheon of the oppressed, e.g. drug users, prisoners, the homeless, psychiatric inmates, cults and sequestered sects, prostitutes/sex workers, youth subcultures, those whose livelihood is criminalized outright, to name but a few.
6. Racial Minorities Outside the Liberal Paradigm: Ranges from conservative minorites to racial/national separatists to ethnic autonomists to lumpen elements, e.g. gangs, conventional criminals, convicts.
7. The DeClasse: Persons from privileged backgrounds, particularly younger people, who reject the values of their class (e.g. egalitarian consumerism).
8. Ecological Radicals: Not tree-hugging Al Gore fans and global warming hysterics, but primitivists, deep ecologists, Earth Firsters, ALFers/ELFers, peak oilers, neo-Luddites, Kaczynskians, and Linkolans.
9. Lower class members of the traditional outgroups and/or left-wing constituent groups: e.g. feminist women, racial/ethnic minorities, traditional union members, gays, sexual minorities, cultural liberals, countercultural youth, environmentalists, who eventually recognize that liberalism isn’t bringing home the bacon and that all of this political correctness isn’t paying the rent.
10. Refugees from Political Correctness: Former liberals who wise up aka modern day Arthur Koestlers.
Collectively, these and other related or overlapping demographic factions represent a majority of the U.S. population (or will be a majority decades from now at the hour of the revolution). Our mission is to build the appropriate coalitions and alliances at the local level, and then at the regional level, and then at the national or continental level with the end game of mass pan-secession always being in sight. To win, we need to take a super-majority of the territorial U.S. with us. The forces of the local coalitions should be reflective of local cultures and dominant ideological trends while regional and national alliances should be based simply on the need for common defense against the common enemy. The anarchist communities of the past are a model for new anarchist communities in the future, the Hanseatic and other medieval leagues are a model for the regional alliances of local communities, and the Continental Congresses or Articles of Confederation of the American Revolution, or the Spanish Anarchist militias, are a model for the assertion of common independence from You Know Who.
The defining characteristics of the historic Left have been the promotion of class struggle and defending outgroups. Classical liberalism was the ideology of the rising bourgeoisie class, and socialism was the ideology of the proletarian insurgency. The Left has usually been involved in the defense of outgroups like racial or religious minorities, or women and homosexuals. But what happens when social dynamics change and new classes become ruling classes, and former outgroups become dominant groups?
Are not advocates of such causes as men’s rights, father’s rights, free speech for “racists and fascists,” religious liberty for traditionalists or fundamentalists, or gun rights speaking up on behalf of present day outgroups? Are not poor, uneducated whites, “rednecks,” or conservative Southerners now an outgroup despised by elites?
In addition to a lengthy list of outgroups associated with the political Right, I have in the past identified a similarly lengthy list of outgroups of a more traditional nature that have never been incorporated into the Left’s pantheon of the oppressed. I have argued for the advancement of such outgroups, left and right, within the context of a class stuggle oriented towards those classes that are outside of the present corporate-social democratic paradigm, and in a way that rejects the state as the twin pillar of plutocracy rather than as the supposed antidote to plutocracy as the Socialists claim.
Are we at ATS and our allies not in fact the “true left” and are not our Cultural Marxist and statist-liberal enemies a new breed of “conservatives” who wish to defend an existing establishment comparable, perhaps, to the Brezhnev conservatives of the latter Soviet period?
Paul Gottfried argues that what separates Left from Right is not equality vs liberty but equality vs inequality. Thomas Sowell argues that the difference is a constrained vision vs an unconstrained vision of humanity, human society, human potential, and so forth. Others have argued the difference is one of universalism vs particularism, or a linear view of history vs the view that history is either cyclical or simply a series of events with no discernible pattern. Still others say the difference is one of tradition vs the experimental. So which one is it, or is it all of these?
Watch it here. Thanks, Andrew!
“It’s a collection of paleo-libertarians, ethnic nationalists, and whatnot. Frankly, I prefer the neocons to these lunatics who celebrate the worse elements of culture in the name of being “anti-state”.”
-So-called left-libertarian “Brain Police” on the Alternative Right
I have long argued that those who see cultural leftism as the primary value system and as one that trumps all other considerations will ultimately be worthless when it comes to fighting the state, the ruling class, or the empire, because they ultimately share the same essential values as the present day elites: hedonism, materialism, cosmopolitanism, univeralism, and egalitarianism.
It really takes a special kind of mind to consider the neocons to be preferable to anti-statists who happen to be cultural conservatives. Many of the leading neocons have openly called for a world war comparable to the two previous ones in the name of eradicating Islam. Many of them have openly called for presidential dictatorship in the name of fighting the war on terrorism. But, hey, who cares about all that when there’s dope to be smoked, internet porn to be jerked off to, and bathhouses to be visited? Justin Raimondo sized up these folks perfectly:
“As long as they can take drugs, abort fetuses, and sodomize each other to their hearts’ content, he and his Beltway buddies have no problem with the US rampaging over half the earth, regime-changing and taking out “rogue” states at will. As long as it’s a “free market” empire, they’re all in favor of it.”
Of course, Justin was talking about the neo-libertarians who’ve made their peace with the establishment, but scratch some of these left-libertarians and you have a budding neo-libertarian. When Brain Police grows out of his sandbox, look for a neocon-friendly “liberaltarian” to emerge.
Check out my interview with the National-Anarchist Women’s blog.
An thoughtful response to my article on white nationalism has been placed at the Occidental Dissent site. The short version of my response to this would be essentially a variation of the same I would give to a Marxist.
“Yes, class matters and socioeconomic relations are important, but they’re not everything or even the most important thing.”
“Yes, race matters and race relations are important, but they’re not everything or even the most important thing.”
As Pareto said:
The class struggle, to which Marx has specially drawn attention, is a real factor, the tokens of which are to be found on every page of history. But the struggle is not confined only to two classes: the proletariat and the capitalist; it occurs between an infinite number of groups with different interests, and above all between the elites contending for power. The existence of these groups may vary in duration, they may be based on permanent or more or less temporary characteristics. In the most savage peoples, and perhaps in all, sex determines two of these groups. The oppression of which the proletariat complains, or had cause to complain of, is as nothing in comparison with that which the women of the Australian aborigines suffer. Characteristics to a greater or lesser degree real — nationality, religion, race, language, etc. — may give rise to these groups. In our own day [i.e. 1902] the struggle of the Czechs and the Germans in Bohemia is more intense than that of the proletariat and the capitalists in England.
The socialists of our own day have clearly perceived that the revolution at the end of the eighteenth century led merely to the bourgeoisie’s taking the place of the old elite. They exaggerate a good deal the burden of oppression imposed by the new masters, but they do sincerely believe that a new elite of politicians will stand by their promises better than those which have come and gone up to the present day. All revolutionaries proclaim, in turn, that previous revolutions have ultimately ended up by deceiving the people; it is their revolution alone which is the true revolution. “All previous historical movements” declared the Communist Manifesto of 1848, “were movements of minorities or in the interest of minorities. The proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority.” Unfortunately this true revolution, which is to bring men an unmixed happiness, is only a deceptive mirage that never becomes a reality. It is akin to the golden age of the millenarians: forever awaited, it is forever lost in the mists of the future, forever eluding its devotees just when they think they have it.
Take out the terms “class struggle” and “socialists” and put in their place “racial struggle” and “racialists” and you have the same principle.