TargetedHumans, Inc.
June 17, 2026 Special Midweek News
FISA 702 What Now?
Wireless Remotely Charging Implants
Integration of US and Israel Military

Email: TargetedHumans@proton.me
YouTube Channel; @TargetedHumans deleted without warning
Targeted Humans Conference Call
Sunday 8:00 p.m. EST
FreeConferenceCall: 605-475-4779
Access Code: 607080
CALL ID: electricrose222

You can make a difference in educating America and the world about what Targeted Humans really are. Make a donation on our website. We have much work to do.

          When Congress fails to reauthorize FISA Section 702, it blocks the statutory authority for new warrantless surveillance collection. However, because existing surveillance certifications are approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to run for year-long periods, ongoing warrantless collection and backdoor searches of Americans’ data can largely continue without immediate interrupt.
https://www.cato.org/blog/fisa-section-702-lapse-going-dark-myth

          The short-term impact of a legislative lapse primarily creates a high-stakes standoff rather than an immediate end to surveillance, but it affects Americans subjected to “incidental collection” or warrantless “backdoor searches” in the following ways:

     1. Existing Spying Continues. Even if the statute itself lapses, previously authorized Section 702 directives and current court orders remain fully valid for their certified durations. This means that the FBI and intelligence agencies can continue to access and query existing databases of intercepted American communications. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/fisa-section-702-backdoor-searches-myths-and-facts-1

     2. Elimination of Statutory Expansions.  When reauthorization bills—like those pushed by House or Senate leadership—fail to pass, it prevents the government from writing new, broader surveillance authorities into law. For example, previous failed bills attempted to expand the definition of what constitutes an “electronic communication service provider” to sweep in private data centers and cloud infrastructure. Defeating these bills stops the government from legally expanding the scope of its dragnet.

     3. Leverage for Actual Privacy Reforms.  For Americans subjected to improper surveillance, the failure of a “clean” or reform-weak extension of the bill gives privacy advocates in Congress leverage to demand real protections. Bills backed by civil rights advocates, such as those detailed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, require the government to obtain a probable-cause warrant before searching Section 702 databases for Americans’ communications. https://demandprogress.org/senate-stops-warrantless-section-702-reauthorization/

     4. Continued Judicial Backing of Surveillance.  Because FISA operates primarily in secret, the court handling these warrants generally only hears arguments from the government. Past independent oversight has revealed that intelligence agencies have historically engaged in widespread, systemic violations of the rules governing queries of Americans’ data. Legislative stalemates keep the spotlight on these abuses but do not immediately punish or provide direct legal recourse to Americans who have already been targeted.
https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/What_Went_%20Wrong_With_The_FISA_Court.pdf

          For in-depth analysis on how this impacts civil liberties and the historical context of warrantless searches on journalists, protesters, and political donors, see the Brennan Center for Justice and Electronic Privacy Information Center.

https://targetedhumans.org/weaponization-of-the-communication-system

Congress quietly moves to integrate 
US and Israeli militaries

Ben Freeman, May 29, 2026

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/israel-us-military/

          The U.S. and Israeli militaries are advancing an unprecedented military integration plan.  The proposal, titled the United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative, appears as Section 224 of the House Armed Services Committee’s version of the fiscal year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the annual US defense policy bill. The bill aims to intertwine the two defense industries, mandate joint ventures, shared research, and shared production of weaponry.  This move represents the most significant tightening of the U.S.-Israel defense relationship since the founding of Israel in 1948.

          The bill includes provisions for “network integration” and “data fusion,” which would formally link U.S. and Israeli military systems and share critical data. The joint efforts will extend into emerging military technologies, including artificial intelligence, drones, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber-operations, and biotechnology. The measure requires the U.S. Secretary of Defense to appoint a single “executive agent” to oversee and coordinate this integration.

          The U.S. and Israel already have an extensive history of joint missile defense development (such as the Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow systems). However, this new legislative effort—which remains under debate in Congress—aims to make this integration permanent and structurally embedded in the U.S. defense supply chain.

What are the negative aspects of this collaboration of militaries?

[Comment:  So they can blame another country on things that they do to Americans!]

          Joining forces with the Israeli military under proposed U.S. legislation (such as Section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act) carries several profound drawbacks, most notably the loss of political transparency, diminished strategic independence, exposure of sensitive technologies, and closer entanglement in controversial regional conflicts.

• Decreased Transparency and Accountability: The legislation shifts the U.S.-Israel military dynamic from visible, publicly debated aid packages into the opaque machinery of defense acquisition and joint contracting, which drastically minimizes diplomatic oversight and political accountability.
• Institutional Lock-in: Moving toward permanent joint research, development, and co-production of weapons fuses the two defense industries together. This creates an “institutional lock-in” that makes it highly difficult for future administrations or Congress to scale back or unwind military cooperation, regardless of political shifts or public opinion.
• Loss of Strategic Independence: By tightly aligning U.S. defense priorities, data fusion, and supply chains with Israel’s specific goals, the U.S. risks losing strategic independence and becoming excessively entangled in foreign conflicts driven by a foreign government’s agenda.
• Security and Intellectual Property Risks: The initiative increases technology sharing and joint ventures in highly sensitive sectors like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and cyber-technology. Critics warn this creates counterintelligence vulnerabilities, places U.S. industry at risk, and might involve partners who have not signed onto international agreements like the Biological Weapons Convention.
• Human Rights and Geopolitical Backlash: Deepening integration with a military facing heavy criticism over its conduct in conflicts across the Middle East risks exacerbating domestic polarization and damaging the U.S.’s standing among international allies and global public opinion.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/31/us-congress-moves-to-deepen-military-ties-with-israel-why-it-matters

https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/section-224-us-israel-defense-integration-beyond-military-aid/

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/longform/2026/6/2/us-university-sells-dead-bodies-to-navy-for-israeli-military-training

As of June 2026, the exact number of innocent civilians killed by Israel in Gaza cannot be definitively determined because official tracking sources do not explicitly separate combatants from civilians. However, multiple independent demographic assessments, international organizations, and leaked internal military data indicate that the vast majority—historically between 56% and 83%—of the over 73,000 total reported fatalities are civilians. Because tracking bodies buried under the rubble remains an ongoing challenge, the total figures and demographic proportions are continually evaluated by various groups.

Factors Affecting the Toll

• Uncounted Fatalities: Local authorities and human rights organizations estimate that over 10,000 individuals remain missing and are presumed dead under the rubble of destroyed buildings, which means the baseline total is likely an undercount.
• Indirect Deaths: Organizations like the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research and the UN World Health Organization point to thousands of additional non-violent civilian deaths caused directly by starvation, lack of clean water, and the collapse of the healthcare infrastructure.
• Combatant Classification Disputes: Human rights groups have criticized the Israeli military’s external tracking for sometimes classifying non-combatant civil servants, police officers, or any military-aged male killed in a strike zone as a militant. Conversely, groups like UN Watch highlight that Hamas utilizes child soldiers under the age of 18, meaning a portion of the recorded minor fatalities may have participated in active combat.
  https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn5wel11pgdo

P.O. Box 2265

New Smyrna Beach 32170-2265