THE extent to which the controlled media in the British Isles is prepared to sink is truly astounding. Even the so-called ‘high brow’ newspapers have watered-down their approach to suit declining intelligence levels and, over the course of the last few days, the likes of the Telegraph, Times and Independent have carefully manufactured the public’s response to the unwarranted attack on Iran by scattering handfuls of poisoned chickenfeed before their gullible readers.
By adopting an infantile, storybook format, these self-appointed bastions of current affairs have guided us through the puerile thoroughfares of Zionist pantomime. First, we were informed that Starmer was reluctant to allow the United States to use British airfields. That, for once, didn’t cause too much consternation among the more right-of-centre plebs, all of whom usually attack the Prime Minister for being either a ‘communist’ or a ‘Muslim-lover,’ but the following day it was alleged that Trump was displeased with his stubborn Westminster counterpart and, naturally, this subtle change in emphasis soon led Starmer’s critics into the arms of the pro-war lobby.
The media’s piecemeal strategy was consolidated one day later, when Starmer – faithfully performing his perennial role as a bumbling coward – was seen to back down to American pressure and Trump began questioning his commitment to the ‘special relationship’ between the two countries. It really was that simple to get the blinkered reactionaries on board with the geopolitical designs of their clandestine overlords, despite the fact that Starmer, Trump and even their beloved Tommy Robinson were each gratefully receiving their thirty shekels of silver long, long ago.
What bedtime stories will the media be sharing with the cerebrally challenged tomorrow, I wonder? After all, everybody thinks they’re ‘political’ now: even if their views are endlessly moulded by the warmongering banks and corporations.
