| Dozens of refueling tankers have been deployed to the region, as have 50 fighter jets and two aircraft carrier strike groups, reports the Times.
During the first Trump administration, the U.S. periodically deployed additional forces to the region as a show of force against Iran without ever attacking the country. Military analysts report that this time appears different.
Defense news site The War Zone notes that most of the U.S.’ few battle-ready E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) planes, which are used to control airspace in combat situations, are either staging in Europe or already in the Middle East.
Not good, Bob.
A situation to monitor or nothing happens? For the time being, the White House is still talking like it wants to keep talking.
Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner met with Iranians in Switzerland, Reason‘s Matthew Petti noted yesterday. Iranian officials were quick to say those talks went well.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also said that “the president has always been very clear, though, with respect to Iran or any country around the world, diplomacy is always his first option, and Iran would be very wise to make a deal.”
Nevertheless, Petti notes that Secretary of State Marco Rubio dismissed the idea that diplomacy was feasible with the Iranian regime in his remarks at the Munich Security Conference on Monday.
Similar to the recent intervention in Venezuela that led to the capture of dictator Nicolás Maduro, the White House isn’t even bothering to consult Congress about a war with Iran or even to make a propagandistic case to the American people that a new Middle Eastern conflict is a good idea.
Doing that would be a little too small-r Republican for this administration.
More worrisome still is the fact that Trump administration officials are increasingly talking like pre-Iraq War Bush administration officials.
Petti again: |