| ◼ The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down West Virginia and North Carolina laws that prevent state health-insurance plans from covering medicalized gender-transition procedures. The opinion, on an 8–6 vote of the full court, was written by Judge Roger Gregory, a Clinton recess appointee who was given a life-tenured judgeship by George W. Bush in a fit of unrequited bipartisan comity 23 years ago. Judge Gregory asked whether “healthcare plans that cover medically necessary treatments for certain diagnoses but bar coverage of those same medically necessary treatments for a diagnosis unique to transgender patients violate either the Equal Protection Clause or other provisions of federal law.” He answered in the affirmative. To frame the question by assuming that such treatments are “medically necessary” even when the legislatures think otherwise is to load the dice. “Why the rush to constitutionalize?” asked Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III. “In the long tomorrow,” he warned, “the recurrent creation of rights so unmoored from constitutional text or history will deplete the store of public respect on which a branch devoid of sword or purse must ultimately rely.” We side with Wilkinson over Gregory in rejecting the overruling of civilian legislative oversight of medical standards by judges on nothing more than their say-so.
◼ Russia has never been known as a good neighbor, so it’s not much of a surprise that the GPS systems of thousands of planes have been jammed while flying over and near the Baltic and the Black Sea. This has been a long-standing problem, at least over the Baltic, and has intensified since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In the Baltic region, it appears that the jamming, which is not hard to do, is coming from Russia’s Kaliningrad exclave and various points close to the Estonian border. The jamming contravenes international agreements but is less dangerous than it sounds, although any interference that forces a reversion to less familiar procedures is undesirable. Additionally, airports, including the one in Tartu, Estonia’s second city, which depend solely on GPS, are left particularly vulnerable. Two Finnair flights headed there recently had to turn back. Russia is sending a signal that it considers the Baltic its backyard. But the jamming is also almost certainly intended to give the West a taste of the harassment it could face if tensions increase further. NATO has no obvious response. It’s time to think beyond the obvious.
◼ In London’s Hyde Park, the authorities covered a Holocaust memorial, owing to the marches now taking place in the city center—marches concerning the Gaza war. Such covering has been done elsewhere as well. Authorities face a dilemma: Cover the memorials, which is unseemly? Or let them be defaced or otherwise vandalized? John Mann, a member of the House of Lords, is the British government’s adviser on antisemitism. He described the covering of the memorial in Hyde Park as “sad but necessary.” We can understand his reasoning. But part of us says, “Let the buggers show who they are, in their vandalism.”
◼ Catholic Answers, a nonprofit dedicated to apologetics online, introduced “Father Justin” on April 23. Hours later, after criticism and ridicule from Catholics left, right, high, and low, the AI chatbot had lost the “Father.” By the end of the week, “Justin” was gone, his funeral evidently a private affair. “I’ve got to take my lumps,” said Jon Sorensen, the chief operating officer of Catholic Answers, discussing what he describes as a kerfuffle in his project to harness the church to artificial intelligence. “Justin” in his short life gave many correct answers but also some wrong ones. He appeared to commit sacrilege by simulating absolution as given by a priest in the sacrament of reconciliation. His uneven responses were spun from information in the vast, impressive archive of Catholic Answers. “We get tons of emails,” Sorensen said, “and there’s a search engine on our website, but a lot of people just don’t use it.” To determine whether the primary sources they find there are reliable or relevant to their inquiry requires judgment. They might not trust theirs, but that of a chatbot won’t necessarily be more intelligent. Human priests in the real world remain available for confessions.
◼ “On any occasion when a response is called for, what usually comes to my lips is a line from some poem or other,” Helen Vendler said in an interview in 1996. “My son laughs about this and says, ‘A quotation for every occasion, Mom.’” She laced her poetry criticism with long but choice prose excerpts, too, from other critics. In early adulthood, the daughter of bookish Boston teachers who insisted on her Catholic education began to trade its rigors for those of literary studies in colleges and universities across the Northeast. From Boston University to Harvard, Cornell, Swarthmore, Haverford, and, in 1981, back to Harvard, where she taught for the next 43 years, she earned a reputation for being the consummate “close reader.” She rejected the label, describing her work rather as “a view from the inside,” the “view of someone who composes with words.” As the author or editor of more than 30 books on English-language poetry, and from perches at the New Yorker and the Pulitzer Committee as well as in Cambridge, she helped revive the waning reputation of Wallace Stevens and boosted those of poets including Rita Dove and Jorie Graham. Dead at 90. R.I.P. |