5 replies »

1. I thought Kim Iversen was the best part of Rising. She was passionate and well informed about important issues, but also refreshingly personal and emotionally present. The fact that you muttered ‘Good riddance’ says way more about YOU than about her. Calling other people names (e.g., ‘transphobic’) is, I guess, legally protected language under the Free Speech clause in the 1st Amendment, though it seems to sidle up to the edge of defamation. More significantly, however, it is also absolutely the lowest form of discourse, a logical fallacy deployed only to vent one’s corked-up frustration by targeting another person. It does nothing to advance a community’s mutual welfare and understanding, which would be better served through civil exchanges of ideas and values. Instead, Name-calling just spreads further discord.

   I’ll be looking for her next venue….

   Reply

2. Kim was the only good thing about Rising. Obviously, the show’s programmers / censors were afraid of the questions she would have asked Fauci, who should be in prison. We will be watching for Kim’s new show. Rising belongs to the losers.

   Reply

3. She was smart to leave and has scruples

   Reply

4. I followed the Hill because of Kim ! She should have interviewed Fauci ! She represents how I feel about the NOT a vaccine ! Their loss not hers !

   Reply

5. As others’ have said, Kim Iverson was the best part of Rising and why I followed. Rising should have let Kim ask Dr. Fauci the hard questions avoided by mainstream media. Without Kim, I do not trust Rising to bring up those unpopular topics. I will follow her on her future venues instead. Goodbye Rising.

   Reply