academiccompositionab
Empowerment Equalizer
SSaragian
Antony Sammeroff
Ann Sterzinger
Rodney
RJ
busterjames
cainusmaxus
Craig FitzGerald
David Heleniak
Caity & Dan Greene
keirmartland
Keith Preston
Bill the Butcher
ljp711
MRDA
Jack Donovan
Rachel Haywire
comrade hermit
Michael
Vince
robertstark2014
Noonan
S E Pearson
Rachel Haywire
Nexus X HumectressThat’s how a student of anarchist movements describes the outlook of yours truly.
Question for discussion: Is this an accurate description of my work? Why or why not?
On one hand, I don’t know of much in the work of Proudhon or Bakunin that would contradict my own outlook. On the other hand, if Ernst Niekisch has been an anarchist rather than a Marxist and if Ernst Junger had been less of a militarist, they might have been me. Hmmm.
Categories: Uncategorized
 | Anonymous on The Forgotten Legacy of John S… |
 | anarch0re on Holocaust Denial Now More Main… |
 | dystopiandeepdives on An Announcement |
| Anonymous on Autism and anarchy: The import… |
 | Dale Dombkowski on Are EVs Truly the Greenest For… |
| Anonymous on Holocaust Denial Now More Main… |
| Anonymous on It’s Not a “National Divorce.”… |
Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic by Chalmers Johnson
I don’t follow LibCom much, but Infoshop reads like a more riotous version of what you would find in an undergraduate, sophomore-level sociology textbook.
It’s hilarious how those people think they’re being so rebellious by simply regurgitating all those standardized cliches. That’s why I like to compare them to the Red Guards of the Cultural Revolution. The Red Guards were student thugs running around attacking people labeled “reactionaries,” “running dogs of capitalism,” and all the usual epithets, thinking they were carrying out a revolution when in reality Mao was running the whole thing from the top as a means of eliminating any opposition to his absolute rule within the CCP and the Chinese state.