What exactly does any of that have to do with the topic at hand?

and;

Why are you promoting Marxism on an anarchist blog?

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

The 1st President of the United States, George Washington, further warned his Nation…

“It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a Free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even of his personal services to the defense of it.”

Unfortunately the American people have failed to heed either one of them as evidenced by their allowing the Nazi coup against Roosevelt to fade from their history books and the murder of Kennedy to go unanswered for.

With such a people supposedly standing behind him, one does wonder how Obama can survive with only these cowards and idiots to protect and defend him, or why he would even want to.

But, and as the great American President Abraham Lincoln once observed by saying

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”

the ‘final chapter’ of this latest chapter in the ‘American Story’ is yet to be written, and maybe, just maybe, these poor souls will end up surprising us all again by willingly sacrificing themselves as individuals for the greater good of their Nation.

The cost? Most assuredly high. The bloodshed? Beyond all description and measure to be sure. But as the great American Founding Father Thomas Jefferson once warned,

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

Nietzsche was another who wrote about the need of tragic-heroes, revolutionary supermen:

“The great men are necessary, the time in which they appear is accidental; that they almost always become masters over their age is only because they are stronger, because they are older, because for a longer time much was gathered for them.” -Twilight of the Idols

“The human being who has become free and how much more the spirit who has become free spits on the contemptible type of well-being dreamed of by shopkeepers, Christians, cows, females, Englishmen, and other bourgeoise. The free man is a warrior. How is freedom measured in individuals and peoples? According to the resistance which must be overcome, according to the exertion required, to remain on top. The highest type of free men should be sought where the highest resistance is constantly overcome: five steps from tyranny, close to the threshold of the danger of servitude. This is true psychologically if by “tyrants” are meant inexorable and fearful instincts that provoke the maximum of authority and discipline against themselves; the most handsome type: Julius Caesar.”

And Lenin another great revolutionary who with the help of the exploited Russians overthrew their exploiters and oppressors in the Russian Revolution:

“The dictatorship of the proletariat is a stubborn struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative against the forces and traditions of the old society. The dictatorship of the proletariat is the instrument of the proletarian revolution, its organ, its most important mainstay, brought into being for the purpose of, firstly, crushing the resistance of the overthrown exploiters and consolidating the achievements of the proletarian revolution, and secondly, carrying the revolution to the complete victory of socialism. Soviet power as the state form of the dictatorship of the proletariat. The victory of the dictatorship of the proletariat signifies the suppression of the bourgeoisie, the smashing of the bourgeois state machine and the substitution of proletarian democracy for bourgeois democracy.”

Therefore, Lenin is right in saying: “The proletarian revolution is impossible without the forcible destruction of the bourgeois state machine and the substitution for it of a new one” (see Vol. XXIII, P. 342)

The time for battle is upon them all, even if they fail to see it.

Unfortunately the American people have failed to heed either one of them as evidenced by their allowing the capitalist coup de etat against Roosevelt to fade from their history books and the murder of Kennedy to go unanswered for.

Let other people you know learn about socialism! Spread the word… the more people who know the truth, the greater the force against the capitalist system! Resistance forever!

Here are a good links toward the introduction of socialist ideology (The only solution for the United States):

http://www.socialistviewpoint.org
http://www.socialistworker.org
http://www.workers.org
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com
http://www.trotsky.net
http://www.marxists.org
http://www.socialistaction.org
http://www.marxist.com
http://www.wsws.org
http://www.socialistalternative.org
http://www.permanent-revolution.org/

.

…………………../´¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯
……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
……………………..’…../
……….”…………. _.·´
……………………..

STICK UP YOUR MIDDLE FINGER TO US IMPERIALISM AND CAPITALIST OPPRESSION !!

I’m not the best individual to answer this question, but IIRC, de Benoist was part of a group of right-wing French intellectuals who decided to rework nationalist and conservative ideas to fit a post-war Europe. Their attempts were of varying degrees of success, but what I find interesting abotu de Benoist is the way in which he took New Left ideas and applied them to Euro-nationalism. So, for example, he contextualises right-wing opposition to immigration with left-wing support for Third World countries; as he sees it, capitalism is the cause of mass immigration, and hence both should be opposed. In de Benoist’s worldview, the struggle of Europeans to preserve their identity is not the domain of violent skinheads and greasy crypto-fascist populists like Griffin or Le Pen, but goes hand-in-hand with the struggle of all peoples disenfranchised by modernity to preserve their unique identities.