that modern “cultural leftism,” “multiculturalism,” “political correctness,” “cultural Marxism” or whatever one wishes to call it is, like orthodox Marxism and American-style liberal-progressivism before it, a type of secularized, pseudo-Christian moralism.

Life’s too short and this movement’s too inconsequential for fights like this.
KP, you’re OK with me and so are the folks on the other side of this. We should try to remember that we’re all brothers-in-arms.

So if you have a feud with a particular LGBT person, you use language that insults LGBTs generally? Even leaving aside what’s ethically dubious about that, do you see how that might conflict with alliance-building? It’s called collateral damage ….

Common ownership is individual EQUAL access opportunity rights.

Ain’t no guess about it.

“I’m just so used to assuming property-rights = standard right-libertarian property rights. There are presumably some social anarchists that don’t believe in any ownership at all and think everything should be commons though.”

I don’t buy even. Even these assholes have a favored owner.

It would certainly help for Zionism to have as little influence over U.S. foreign-policy as black-nationalist separatism, although an anarcho-Zionism, or quasi-anarchozionism is certainly conceivable.

By “acceptable” I meant by the standards of Keith’s secessionist popular front. I assumed that we’re all opposed the massive amounts of U.S foreign aid going to Israel and all the intervention there (and elsewhere).

I guess you’re right, Kinsella. I’m just so used to assuming property-rights = standard right-libertarian property rights. There are presumably some social anarchists that don’t believe in any ownership at all and think everything should be commons though.

Curious, why do you say this? A property right means the right to control a given scarce resource. Surely Maoists have a position on who should own, say, the means of production. You don’t mean to imply that Maoists think such things should be unowned, do you? That they should have no owners?

Criticizing unhelpful tendecy’s in the milieu is essential to evolving out of roadblocks to success.

Sure – the question being posed though is whether this has become a preoccupation rather than an instrumental means to pan-secessionist strategy. I suppose if you don’t consider yourself on the left, you don’t see as much at stake as I, a leftist and pan-secessionist ally, do.